Cargando…

Physiological Response to Membrane Protein Overexpression in E. coli

Overexpression represents a principal bottleneck in structural and functional studies of integral membrane proteins (IMPs). Although E. coli remains the leading organism for convenient and economical protein overexpression, many IMPs exhibit toxicity on induction in this host and give low yields of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gubellini, Francesca, Verdon, Grégory, Karpowich, Nathan K., Luff, Jon D., Boël, Grégory, Gauthier, Nils, Handelman, Samuel K., Ades, Sarah E., Hunt, John F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21719796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.007930
_version_ 1782215373163069440
author Gubellini, Francesca
Verdon, Grégory
Karpowich, Nathan K.
Luff, Jon D.
Boël, Grégory
Gauthier, Nils
Handelman, Samuel K.
Ades, Sarah E.
Hunt, John F.
author_facet Gubellini, Francesca
Verdon, Grégory
Karpowich, Nathan K.
Luff, Jon D.
Boël, Grégory
Gauthier, Nils
Handelman, Samuel K.
Ades, Sarah E.
Hunt, John F.
author_sort Gubellini, Francesca
collection PubMed
description Overexpression represents a principal bottleneck in structural and functional studies of integral membrane proteins (IMPs). Although E. coli remains the leading organism for convenient and economical protein overexpression, many IMPs exhibit toxicity on induction in this host and give low yields of properly folded protein. Different mechanisms related to membrane biogenesis and IMP folding have been proposed to contribute to these problems, but there is limited understanding of the physical and physiological constraints on IMP overexpression and folding in vivo. Therefore, we used a variety of genetic, genomic, and microscopy techniques to characterize the physiological responses of Escherichia coli MG1655 cells to overexpression of a set of soluble proteins and IMPs, including constructs exhibiting different levels of toxicity and producing different levels of properly folded versus misfolded product on induction. Genetic marker studies coupled with transcriptomic results indicate only minor perturbations in many of the physiological systems implicated in previous studies of IMP biogenesis. Overexpression of either IMPs or soluble proteins tends to block execution of the standard stationary-phase transcriptional program, although these effects are consistently stronger for the IMPs included in our study. However, these perturbations are not an impediment to successful protein overexpression. We present evidence that, at least for the target proteins included in our study, there is no inherent obstacle to IMP overexpression in E. coli at moderate levels suitable for structural studies and that the biochemical and conformational properties of the proteins themselves are the major obstacles to success. Toxicity associated with target protein activity produces selective pressure leading to preferential growth of cells harboring expression-reducing and inactivating mutations, which can produce chemical heterogeneity in the target protein population, potentially contributing to the difficulties encountered in IMP crystallization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3205863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32058632011-11-14 Physiological Response to Membrane Protein Overexpression in E. coli Gubellini, Francesca Verdon, Grégory Karpowich, Nathan K. Luff, Jon D. Boël, Grégory Gauthier, Nils Handelman, Samuel K. Ades, Sarah E. Hunt, John F. Mol Cell Proteomics Research Overexpression represents a principal bottleneck in structural and functional studies of integral membrane proteins (IMPs). Although E. coli remains the leading organism for convenient and economical protein overexpression, many IMPs exhibit toxicity on induction in this host and give low yields of properly folded protein. Different mechanisms related to membrane biogenesis and IMP folding have been proposed to contribute to these problems, but there is limited understanding of the physical and physiological constraints on IMP overexpression and folding in vivo. Therefore, we used a variety of genetic, genomic, and microscopy techniques to characterize the physiological responses of Escherichia coli MG1655 cells to overexpression of a set of soluble proteins and IMPs, including constructs exhibiting different levels of toxicity and producing different levels of properly folded versus misfolded product on induction. Genetic marker studies coupled with transcriptomic results indicate only minor perturbations in many of the physiological systems implicated in previous studies of IMP biogenesis. Overexpression of either IMPs or soluble proteins tends to block execution of the standard stationary-phase transcriptional program, although these effects are consistently stronger for the IMPs included in our study. However, these perturbations are not an impediment to successful protein overexpression. We present evidence that, at least for the target proteins included in our study, there is no inherent obstacle to IMP overexpression in E. coli at moderate levels suitable for structural studies and that the biochemical and conformational properties of the proteins themselves are the major obstacles to success. Toxicity associated with target protein activity produces selective pressure leading to preferential growth of cells harboring expression-reducing and inactivating mutations, which can produce chemical heterogeneity in the target protein population, potentially contributing to the difficulties encountered in IMP crystallization. The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2011-10 2011-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3205863/ /pubmed/21719796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.007930 Text en © 2011 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) applies to Author Choice Articles
spellingShingle Research
Gubellini, Francesca
Verdon, Grégory
Karpowich, Nathan K.
Luff, Jon D.
Boël, Grégory
Gauthier, Nils
Handelman, Samuel K.
Ades, Sarah E.
Hunt, John F.
Physiological Response to Membrane Protein Overexpression in E. coli
title Physiological Response to Membrane Protein Overexpression in E. coli
title_full Physiological Response to Membrane Protein Overexpression in E. coli
title_fullStr Physiological Response to Membrane Protein Overexpression in E. coli
title_full_unstemmed Physiological Response to Membrane Protein Overexpression in E. coli
title_short Physiological Response to Membrane Protein Overexpression in E. coli
title_sort physiological response to membrane protein overexpression in e. coli
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21719796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.007930
work_keys_str_mv AT gubellinifrancesca physiologicalresponsetomembraneproteinoverexpressioninecoli
AT verdongregory physiologicalresponsetomembraneproteinoverexpressioninecoli
AT karpowichnathank physiologicalresponsetomembraneproteinoverexpressioninecoli
AT luffjond physiologicalresponsetomembraneproteinoverexpressioninecoli
AT boelgregory physiologicalresponsetomembraneproteinoverexpressioninecoli
AT gauthiernils physiologicalresponsetomembraneproteinoverexpressioninecoli
AT handelmansamuelk physiologicalresponsetomembraneproteinoverexpressioninecoli
AT adessarahe physiologicalresponsetomembraneproteinoverexpressioninecoli
AT huntjohnf physiologicalresponsetomembraneproteinoverexpressioninecoli