Cargando…

Evaluation of patients’ experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure – what can be improved?

INTRODUCTION: Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab has become one of the most commonly performed ophthalmic procedures. It is timely to conduct an evaluation of the injection procedure from the patient’s perspective so as to determine ways to improve patient experience. The purpose of this study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tailor, Rajen, Beasley, Rebecca, Yang, Yit, Narendran, Niro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3206121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22069352
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S24358
_version_ 1782215396814749696
author Tailor, Rajen
Beasley, Rebecca
Yang, Yit
Narendran, Niro
author_facet Tailor, Rajen
Beasley, Rebecca
Yang, Yit
Narendran, Niro
author_sort Tailor, Rajen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab has become one of the most commonly performed ophthalmic procedures. It is timely to conduct an evaluation of the injection procedure from the patient’s perspective so as to determine ways to improve patient experience. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe patients’ experiences of the different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure and provide suggestions for improvement. METHOD: Following intravitreal injection, patients were administered a questionnaire to score the distress felt for each of ten parts of the whole injection process from the initial waiting to the final instillation of topical antibiotic at the end. A score of higher than 4 was regarded as significantly unpleasant. The proportion of scores above 4 for each step was used to evaluate the relative distress experienced by patients for the different parts of the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were surveyed. The step with the highest percentage of patients scoring more than 4 was the injection step (19%). However, cumulatively, the steps relating to the application of the drape, the speculum, and the removal of drape accounted for 53% of scores greater than 4. CONCLUSION: There is considerable variation in how patients tolerate different stages of the injection procedure. The needle entry was the most unpleasant step followed by the draping steps cumulatively. Use of subconjunctival anesthesia, a perforated drape, and alternative lid exclusion devices may help to improve the patient’s tolerability of the procedure and experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3206121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32061212011-11-08 Evaluation of patients’ experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure – what can be improved? Tailor, Rajen Beasley, Rebecca Yang, Yit Narendran, Niro Clin Ophthalmol Original Research INTRODUCTION: Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab has become one of the most commonly performed ophthalmic procedures. It is timely to conduct an evaluation of the injection procedure from the patient’s perspective so as to determine ways to improve patient experience. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe patients’ experiences of the different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure and provide suggestions for improvement. METHOD: Following intravitreal injection, patients were administered a questionnaire to score the distress felt for each of ten parts of the whole injection process from the initial waiting to the final instillation of topical antibiotic at the end. A score of higher than 4 was regarded as significantly unpleasant. The proportion of scores above 4 for each step was used to evaluate the relative distress experienced by patients for the different parts of the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were surveyed. The step with the highest percentage of patients scoring more than 4 was the injection step (19%). However, cumulatively, the steps relating to the application of the drape, the speculum, and the removal of drape accounted for 53% of scores greater than 4. CONCLUSION: There is considerable variation in how patients tolerate different stages of the injection procedure. The needle entry was the most unpleasant step followed by the draping steps cumulatively. Use of subconjunctival anesthesia, a perforated drape, and alternative lid exclusion devices may help to improve the patient’s tolerability of the procedure and experience. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3206121/ /pubmed/22069352 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S24358 Text en © 2011 Tailor et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tailor, Rajen
Beasley, Rebecca
Yang, Yit
Narendran, Niro
Evaluation of patients’ experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure – what can be improved?
title Evaluation of patients’ experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure – what can be improved?
title_full Evaluation of patients’ experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure – what can be improved?
title_fullStr Evaluation of patients’ experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure – what can be improved?
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of patients’ experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure – what can be improved?
title_short Evaluation of patients’ experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure – what can be improved?
title_sort evaluation of patients’ experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure – what can be improved?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3206121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22069352
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S24358
work_keys_str_mv AT tailorrajen evaluationofpatientsexperiencesatdifferentstagesoftheintravitrealinjectionprocedurewhatcanbeimproved
AT beasleyrebecca evaluationofpatientsexperiencesatdifferentstagesoftheintravitrealinjectionprocedurewhatcanbeimproved
AT yangyit evaluationofpatientsexperiencesatdifferentstagesoftheintravitrealinjectionprocedurewhatcanbeimproved
AT narendranniro evaluationofpatientsexperiencesatdifferentstagesoftheintravitrealinjectionprocedurewhatcanbeimproved