Cargando…

Genomic Ancestry, Self-Reported “Color” and Quantitative Measures of Skin Pigmentation in Brazilian Admixed Siblings

A current concern in genetic epidemiology studies in admixed populations is that population stratification can lead to spurious results. The Brazilian census classifies individuals according to self-reported “color”, but several studies have demonstrated that stratifying according to “color” is not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leite, Tailce K. M., Fonseca, Rômulo M. C., de França, Nanci M., Parra, Esteban J., Pereira, Rinaldo W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3206941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22073278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027162
_version_ 1782215509588049920
author Leite, Tailce K. M.
Fonseca, Rômulo M. C.
de França, Nanci M.
Parra, Esteban J.
Pereira, Rinaldo W.
author_facet Leite, Tailce K. M.
Fonseca, Rômulo M. C.
de França, Nanci M.
Parra, Esteban J.
Pereira, Rinaldo W.
author_sort Leite, Tailce K. M.
collection PubMed
description A current concern in genetic epidemiology studies in admixed populations is that population stratification can lead to spurious results. The Brazilian census classifies individuals according to self-reported “color”, but several studies have demonstrated that stratifying according to “color” is not a useful strategy to control for population structure, due to the dissociation between self-reported “color” and genomic ancestry. We report the results of a study in a group of Brazilian siblings in which we measured skin pigmentation using a reflectometer, and estimated genomic ancestry using 21 Ancestry Informative Markers (AIMs). Self-reported “color”, according to the Brazilian census, was also available for each participant. This made it possible to evaluate the relationship between self-reported “color” and skin pigmentation, self-reported “color” and genomic ancestry, and skin pigmentation and genomic ancestry. We observed that, although there were significant differences between the three “color” groups in genomic ancestry and skin pigmentation, there was considerable dispersion within each group and substantial overlap between groups. We also saw that there was no good agreement between the “color” categories reported by each member of the sibling pair: 30 out of 86 sibling pairs reported different “color”, and in some cases, the sibling reporting the darker “color” category had lighter skin pigmentation. Socioeconomic status was significantly associated with self-reported “color” and genomic ancestry in this sample. This and other studies show that subjective classifications based on self-reported “color”, such as the one that is used in the Brazilian census, are inadequate to describe the population structure present in recently admixed populations. Finally, we observed that one of the AIMs included in the panel (rs1426654), which is located in the known pigmentation gene SLC24A5, was strongly associated with skin pigmentation in this sample.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3206941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32069412011-11-09 Genomic Ancestry, Self-Reported “Color” and Quantitative Measures of Skin Pigmentation in Brazilian Admixed Siblings Leite, Tailce K. M. Fonseca, Rômulo M. C. de França, Nanci M. Parra, Esteban J. Pereira, Rinaldo W. PLoS One Research Article A current concern in genetic epidemiology studies in admixed populations is that population stratification can lead to spurious results. The Brazilian census classifies individuals according to self-reported “color”, but several studies have demonstrated that stratifying according to “color” is not a useful strategy to control for population structure, due to the dissociation between self-reported “color” and genomic ancestry. We report the results of a study in a group of Brazilian siblings in which we measured skin pigmentation using a reflectometer, and estimated genomic ancestry using 21 Ancestry Informative Markers (AIMs). Self-reported “color”, according to the Brazilian census, was also available for each participant. This made it possible to evaluate the relationship between self-reported “color” and skin pigmentation, self-reported “color” and genomic ancestry, and skin pigmentation and genomic ancestry. We observed that, although there were significant differences between the three “color” groups in genomic ancestry and skin pigmentation, there was considerable dispersion within each group and substantial overlap between groups. We also saw that there was no good agreement between the “color” categories reported by each member of the sibling pair: 30 out of 86 sibling pairs reported different “color”, and in some cases, the sibling reporting the darker “color” category had lighter skin pigmentation. Socioeconomic status was significantly associated with self-reported “color” and genomic ancestry in this sample. This and other studies show that subjective classifications based on self-reported “color”, such as the one that is used in the Brazilian census, are inadequate to describe the population structure present in recently admixed populations. Finally, we observed that one of the AIMs included in the panel (rs1426654), which is located in the known pigmentation gene SLC24A5, was strongly associated with skin pigmentation in this sample. Public Library of Science 2011-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3206941/ /pubmed/22073278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027162 Text en Leite et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leite, Tailce K. M.
Fonseca, Rômulo M. C.
de França, Nanci M.
Parra, Esteban J.
Pereira, Rinaldo W.
Genomic Ancestry, Self-Reported “Color” and Quantitative Measures of Skin Pigmentation in Brazilian Admixed Siblings
title Genomic Ancestry, Self-Reported “Color” and Quantitative Measures of Skin Pigmentation in Brazilian Admixed Siblings
title_full Genomic Ancestry, Self-Reported “Color” and Quantitative Measures of Skin Pigmentation in Brazilian Admixed Siblings
title_fullStr Genomic Ancestry, Self-Reported “Color” and Quantitative Measures of Skin Pigmentation in Brazilian Admixed Siblings
title_full_unstemmed Genomic Ancestry, Self-Reported “Color” and Quantitative Measures of Skin Pigmentation in Brazilian Admixed Siblings
title_short Genomic Ancestry, Self-Reported “Color” and Quantitative Measures of Skin Pigmentation in Brazilian Admixed Siblings
title_sort genomic ancestry, self-reported “color” and quantitative measures of skin pigmentation in brazilian admixed siblings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3206941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22073278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027162
work_keys_str_mv AT leitetailcekm genomicancestryselfreportedcolorandquantitativemeasuresofskinpigmentationinbrazilianadmixedsiblings
AT fonsecaromulomc genomicancestryselfreportedcolorandquantitativemeasuresofskinpigmentationinbrazilianadmixedsiblings
AT defrancanancim genomicancestryselfreportedcolorandquantitativemeasuresofskinpigmentationinbrazilianadmixedsiblings
AT parraestebanj genomicancestryselfreportedcolorandquantitativemeasuresofskinpigmentationinbrazilianadmixedsiblings
AT pereirarinaldow genomicancestryselfreportedcolorandquantitativemeasuresofskinpigmentationinbrazilianadmixedsiblings