Cargando…
Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Back pain remains a challenge for primary care internationally. One model that has not been tested is stratification of the management according to the patient's prognosis (low, medium, or high risk). We compared the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stratified primar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lancet Publishing Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3208163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21963002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9 |
_version_ | 1782215599919726592 |
---|---|
author | Hill, Jonathan C Whitehurst, David GT Lewis, Martyn Bryan, Stirling Dunn, Kate M Foster, Nadine E Konstantinou, Kika Main, Chris J Mason, Elizabeth Somerville, Simon Sowden, Gail Vohora, Kanchan Hay, Elaine M |
author_facet | Hill, Jonathan C Whitehurst, David GT Lewis, Martyn Bryan, Stirling Dunn, Kate M Foster, Nadine E Konstantinou, Kika Main, Chris J Mason, Elizabeth Somerville, Simon Sowden, Gail Vohora, Kanchan Hay, Elaine M |
author_sort | Hill, Jonathan C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Back pain remains a challenge for primary care internationally. One model that has not been tested is stratification of the management according to the patient's prognosis (low, medium, or high risk). We compared the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stratified primary care (intervention) with non-stratified current best practice (control). METHODS: 1573 adults (aged ≥18 years) with back pain (with or without radiculopathy) consultations at ten general practices in England responded to invitations to attend an assessment clinic. Eligible participants were randomly assigned by use of computer-generated stratified blocks with a 2:1 ratio to intervention or control group. Primary outcome was the effect of treatment on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score at 12 months. In the economic evaluation, we focused on estimating incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and health-care costs related to back pain. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN37113406. FINDINGS: 851 patients were assigned to the intervention (n=568) and control groups (n=283). Overall, adjusted mean changes in RMDQ scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group at 4 months (4·7 [SD 5·9] vs 3·0 [5·9], between-group difference 1·81 [95% CI 1·06–2·57]) and at 12 months (4·3 [6·4] vs 3·3 [6·2], 1·06 [0·25–1·86]), equating to effect sizes of 0·32 (0·19–0·45) and 0·19 (0·04–0·33), respectively. At 12 months, stratified care was associated with a mean increase in generic health benefit (0·039 additional QALYs) and cost savings (£240·01 vs £274·40) compared with the control group. INTERPRETATION: The results show that a stratified approach, by use of prognostic screening with matched pathways, will have important implications for the future management of back pain in primary care. FUNDING: Arthritis Research UK. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3208163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Lancet Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32081632012-01-19 Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial Hill, Jonathan C Whitehurst, David GT Lewis, Martyn Bryan, Stirling Dunn, Kate M Foster, Nadine E Konstantinou, Kika Main, Chris J Mason, Elizabeth Somerville, Simon Sowden, Gail Vohora, Kanchan Hay, Elaine M Lancet Articles BACKGROUND: Back pain remains a challenge for primary care internationally. One model that has not been tested is stratification of the management according to the patient's prognosis (low, medium, or high risk). We compared the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stratified primary care (intervention) with non-stratified current best practice (control). METHODS: 1573 adults (aged ≥18 years) with back pain (with or without radiculopathy) consultations at ten general practices in England responded to invitations to attend an assessment clinic. Eligible participants were randomly assigned by use of computer-generated stratified blocks with a 2:1 ratio to intervention or control group. Primary outcome was the effect of treatment on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score at 12 months. In the economic evaluation, we focused on estimating incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and health-care costs related to back pain. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN37113406. FINDINGS: 851 patients were assigned to the intervention (n=568) and control groups (n=283). Overall, adjusted mean changes in RMDQ scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group at 4 months (4·7 [SD 5·9] vs 3·0 [5·9], between-group difference 1·81 [95% CI 1·06–2·57]) and at 12 months (4·3 [6·4] vs 3·3 [6·2], 1·06 [0·25–1·86]), equating to effect sizes of 0·32 (0·19–0·45) and 0·19 (0·04–0·33), respectively. At 12 months, stratified care was associated with a mean increase in generic health benefit (0·039 additional QALYs) and cost savings (£240·01 vs £274·40) compared with the control group. INTERPRETATION: The results show that a stratified approach, by use of prognostic screening with matched pathways, will have important implications for the future management of back pain in primary care. FUNDING: Arthritis Research UK. Lancet Publishing Group 2011-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3208163/ /pubmed/21963002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9 Text en © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/supplementalterms1.0) . |
spellingShingle | Articles Hill, Jonathan C Whitehurst, David GT Lewis, Martyn Bryan, Stirling Dunn, Kate M Foster, Nadine E Konstantinou, Kika Main, Chris J Mason, Elizabeth Somerville, Simon Sowden, Gail Vohora, Kanchan Hay, Elaine M Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial |
title | Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (start back): a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3208163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21963002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hilljonathanc comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT whitehurstdavidgt comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lewismartyn comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bryanstirling comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dunnkatem comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fosternadinee comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT konstantinoukika comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mainchrisj comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT masonelizabeth comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT somervillesimon comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sowdengail comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vohorakanchan comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hayelainem comparisonofstratifiedprimarycaremanagementforlowbackpainwithcurrentbestpracticestartbackarandomisedcontrolledtrial |