Cargando…

Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of NSAIDs users

BACKGROUND: A clinical history of peptic ulcer has been reported to be associated with a high rate of ulcer recurrence in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users. Therefore, it is a very important issue to precisely know the previous history prior to NSAIDs administration. To clarify the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amano, Yuji, Uno, Goichi, Yuki, Takafumi, Okada, Mayumi, Tada, Yasumasa, Fukuba, Nobuhiko, Ishimura, Norihisa, Ishihara, Shunji, Kinoshita, Yoshikazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3208243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21996289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-409
_version_ 1782215605735129088
author Amano, Yuji
Uno, Goichi
Yuki, Takafumi
Okada, Mayumi
Tada, Yasumasa
Fukuba, Nobuhiko
Ishimura, Norihisa
Ishihara, Shunji
Kinoshita, Yoshikazu
author_facet Amano, Yuji
Uno, Goichi
Yuki, Takafumi
Okada, Mayumi
Tada, Yasumasa
Fukuba, Nobuhiko
Ishimura, Norihisa
Ishihara, Shunji
Kinoshita, Yoshikazu
author_sort Amano, Yuji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A clinical history of peptic ulcer has been reported to be associated with a high rate of ulcer recurrence in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users. Therefore, it is a very important issue to precisely know the previous history prior to NSAIDs administration. To clarify the possible difficulty to identify the history, we determined the sensitivity and diagnostic concordance of endoscopy for the identification of ulcer scars indicative of previous clinical history of peptic ulcer diseases. METHODS: The first study enrolled 200 consecutive patients with a clinical history of gastric or duodenal ulcers previously confirmed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The sensitivity of endoscopy for identifying scars was determined for these patients. In the second study, the extent of interobserver agreement was determined for 47 endoscopists who identified ulcer scars in endoscopic photographs of 30 sites of previous active gastric ulcers and 30 sites of previous active duodenal ulcers. The kappa coefficient of reliability was calculated to measure the interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of ulcer scars. RESULTS: Out of 190 patients eligible for analysis, 104 (54.7%) were found to have gastric or duodenal ulcer scars on endoscopy; there were no gastric or duodenal ulcer scars seen in the remaining patients (45%). In the second study, the kappa values for endoscopic diagnosis of gastric and duodenal ulcer scars were 0.14 (95% CI 0.13-0.16) and 0.29 (95% CI 0.27-0.32), respectively. The addition of indigo-carmine chromoendoscopy did not provide a statistically significant improvement in diagnostic concordance in patients with gastric ulcer scar since the kappa value for chromoendoscopic diagnosis was 0.15; 95% CI 0.13-0.17 as low as for un-contrasted scars. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and concordance of endoscopic diagnosis of gastric and duodenal ulcer scars are not satisfactory for the use of endoscopy only to identify previous ulcer disease. To avoid the overlooking the previous clinical history of peptic ulcer diseases, the diagnosis of peptic ulcer scar has to be carefully done prior to NSAIDs administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3208243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32082432011-11-05 Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of NSAIDs users Amano, Yuji Uno, Goichi Yuki, Takafumi Okada, Mayumi Tada, Yasumasa Fukuba, Nobuhiko Ishimura, Norihisa Ishihara, Shunji Kinoshita, Yoshikazu BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: A clinical history of peptic ulcer has been reported to be associated with a high rate of ulcer recurrence in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users. Therefore, it is a very important issue to precisely know the previous history prior to NSAIDs administration. To clarify the possible difficulty to identify the history, we determined the sensitivity and diagnostic concordance of endoscopy for the identification of ulcer scars indicative of previous clinical history of peptic ulcer diseases. METHODS: The first study enrolled 200 consecutive patients with a clinical history of gastric or duodenal ulcers previously confirmed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The sensitivity of endoscopy for identifying scars was determined for these patients. In the second study, the extent of interobserver agreement was determined for 47 endoscopists who identified ulcer scars in endoscopic photographs of 30 sites of previous active gastric ulcers and 30 sites of previous active duodenal ulcers. The kappa coefficient of reliability was calculated to measure the interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of ulcer scars. RESULTS: Out of 190 patients eligible for analysis, 104 (54.7%) were found to have gastric or duodenal ulcer scars on endoscopy; there were no gastric or duodenal ulcer scars seen in the remaining patients (45%). In the second study, the kappa values for endoscopic diagnosis of gastric and duodenal ulcer scars were 0.14 (95% CI 0.13-0.16) and 0.29 (95% CI 0.27-0.32), respectively. The addition of indigo-carmine chromoendoscopy did not provide a statistically significant improvement in diagnostic concordance in patients with gastric ulcer scar since the kappa value for chromoendoscopic diagnosis was 0.15; 95% CI 0.13-0.17 as low as for un-contrasted scars. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and concordance of endoscopic diagnosis of gastric and duodenal ulcer scars are not satisfactory for the use of endoscopy only to identify previous ulcer disease. To avoid the overlooking the previous clinical history of peptic ulcer diseases, the diagnosis of peptic ulcer scar has to be carefully done prior to NSAIDs administration. BioMed Central 2011-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3208243/ /pubmed/21996289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-409 Text en Copyright ©2011 Amano et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Amano, Yuji
Uno, Goichi
Yuki, Takafumi
Okada, Mayumi
Tada, Yasumasa
Fukuba, Nobuhiko
Ishimura, Norihisa
Ishihara, Shunji
Kinoshita, Yoshikazu
Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of NSAIDs users
title Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of NSAIDs users
title_full Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of NSAIDs users
title_fullStr Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of NSAIDs users
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of NSAIDs users
title_short Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of NSAIDs users
title_sort interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of nsaids users
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3208243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21996289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-409
work_keys_str_mv AT amanoyuji interobservervariationintheendoscopicdiagnosisofgastroduodenalulcerscarsimplicationsforclinicalmanagementofnsaidsusers
AT unogoichi interobservervariationintheendoscopicdiagnosisofgastroduodenalulcerscarsimplicationsforclinicalmanagementofnsaidsusers
AT yukitakafumi interobservervariationintheendoscopicdiagnosisofgastroduodenalulcerscarsimplicationsforclinicalmanagementofnsaidsusers
AT okadamayumi interobservervariationintheendoscopicdiagnosisofgastroduodenalulcerscarsimplicationsforclinicalmanagementofnsaidsusers
AT tadayasumasa interobservervariationintheendoscopicdiagnosisofgastroduodenalulcerscarsimplicationsforclinicalmanagementofnsaidsusers
AT fukubanobuhiko interobservervariationintheendoscopicdiagnosisofgastroduodenalulcerscarsimplicationsforclinicalmanagementofnsaidsusers
AT ishimuranorihisa interobservervariationintheendoscopicdiagnosisofgastroduodenalulcerscarsimplicationsforclinicalmanagementofnsaidsusers
AT ishiharashunji interobservervariationintheendoscopicdiagnosisofgastroduodenalulcerscarsimplicationsforclinicalmanagementofnsaidsusers
AT kinoshitayoshikazu interobservervariationintheendoscopicdiagnosisofgastroduodenalulcerscarsimplicationsforclinicalmanagementofnsaidsusers