Cargando…

An Evaluation of the Performance and Acceptability of Three LED Fluorescent Microscopes in Zambia: Lessons Learnt for Scale-Up

The World Health Organization recommends the roll-out of light-emitting diode (LED) fluorescent microscopes (FM) as an alternative to light microscopes in resource-limited settings. We evaluated the acceptability and performance of three LED FMs after a short orientation among laboratory technicians...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turnbull, Eleanor R., Kaunda, Kaunda, Harris, Jennifer B., Kapata, Nathan, Muvwimi, Mweemba W., Kruuner, Annika, Henostroza, German, Reid, Stewart E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3208552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22073271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027125
_version_ 1782215629938360320
author Turnbull, Eleanor R.
Kaunda, Kaunda
Harris, Jennifer B.
Kapata, Nathan
Muvwimi, Mweemba W.
Kruuner, Annika
Henostroza, German
Reid, Stewart E.
author_facet Turnbull, Eleanor R.
Kaunda, Kaunda
Harris, Jennifer B.
Kapata, Nathan
Muvwimi, Mweemba W.
Kruuner, Annika
Henostroza, German
Reid, Stewart E.
author_sort Turnbull, Eleanor R.
collection PubMed
description The World Health Organization recommends the roll-out of light-emitting diode (LED) fluorescent microscopes (FM) as an alternative to light microscopes in resource-limited settings. We evaluated the acceptability and performance of three LED FMs after a short orientation among laboratory technicians from government health centers in Zambia. Sixteen technicians with varied light microscopy experience were oriented to FMs and divided into groups; each group read a different set of 40 slides on each LED FM (Primo Star iLED™, Lumin™, FluoLED™) and on a reference mercury-vapor FM (Olympus BX41TF). Slide reading times were recorded. An experienced FM technician examined each slide on the Olympus BX41TF. Sensitivity and specificity compared to TB culture were calculated. Misclassification compared to the experienced technician and inter-rater reliability between trainees was assessed. Trainees rated microscopes on technical aspects. Primo Star iLED™, FluoLED™ and Olympus BX41TF had comparable sensitivities (67%, 65% and 65% respectively), with the Lumin™ significantly worse (56%; p<0.05). Specificity was low for trainees on all microscopes (75.9%) compared to the experienced technician on Olympus BX41TF (100%). Primo Star iLED™ had significantly less misclassification (21.1% p<0.05) than FluoLED™ (26.5%) and Lumin™ (26.8%) and significantly higher inter-rater reliability (0.611; p<0.05), compared to FluoLED™ (0.523) and Lumin™ (0.492). Slide reading times for LED FMs were slower than the reference, but not significantly different from each other. Primo Star iLED™ rated highest in acceptability measures, followed by FluoLED™ then Lumin™. Primo Star iLED™ was consistently better than FluoLED™ and Lumin™, and performed comparably to the Olympus BX41TF in all analyses, except reading times. The Lumin™ compared least favorably and was thought unacceptable for use. Specificity and inter-rater reliability were low for all microscopes suggesting that a brief orientation was insufficient in this setting. These results provide important data for resource-limited settings to consider as they scale-up LED FMs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3208552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32085522011-11-09 An Evaluation of the Performance and Acceptability of Three LED Fluorescent Microscopes in Zambia: Lessons Learnt for Scale-Up Turnbull, Eleanor R. Kaunda, Kaunda Harris, Jennifer B. Kapata, Nathan Muvwimi, Mweemba W. Kruuner, Annika Henostroza, German Reid, Stewart E. PLoS One Research Article The World Health Organization recommends the roll-out of light-emitting diode (LED) fluorescent microscopes (FM) as an alternative to light microscopes in resource-limited settings. We evaluated the acceptability and performance of three LED FMs after a short orientation among laboratory technicians from government health centers in Zambia. Sixteen technicians with varied light microscopy experience were oriented to FMs and divided into groups; each group read a different set of 40 slides on each LED FM (Primo Star iLED™, Lumin™, FluoLED™) and on a reference mercury-vapor FM (Olympus BX41TF). Slide reading times were recorded. An experienced FM technician examined each slide on the Olympus BX41TF. Sensitivity and specificity compared to TB culture were calculated. Misclassification compared to the experienced technician and inter-rater reliability between trainees was assessed. Trainees rated microscopes on technical aspects. Primo Star iLED™, FluoLED™ and Olympus BX41TF had comparable sensitivities (67%, 65% and 65% respectively), with the Lumin™ significantly worse (56%; p<0.05). Specificity was low for trainees on all microscopes (75.9%) compared to the experienced technician on Olympus BX41TF (100%). Primo Star iLED™ had significantly less misclassification (21.1% p<0.05) than FluoLED™ (26.5%) and Lumin™ (26.8%) and significantly higher inter-rater reliability (0.611; p<0.05), compared to FluoLED™ (0.523) and Lumin™ (0.492). Slide reading times for LED FMs were slower than the reference, but not significantly different from each other. Primo Star iLED™ rated highest in acceptability measures, followed by FluoLED™ then Lumin™. Primo Star iLED™ was consistently better than FluoLED™ and Lumin™, and performed comparably to the Olympus BX41TF in all analyses, except reading times. The Lumin™ compared least favorably and was thought unacceptable for use. Specificity and inter-rater reliability were low for all microscopes suggesting that a brief orientation was insufficient in this setting. These results provide important data for resource-limited settings to consider as they scale-up LED FMs. Public Library of Science 2011-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3208552/ /pubmed/22073271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027125 Text en Turnbull et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Turnbull, Eleanor R.
Kaunda, Kaunda
Harris, Jennifer B.
Kapata, Nathan
Muvwimi, Mweemba W.
Kruuner, Annika
Henostroza, German
Reid, Stewart E.
An Evaluation of the Performance and Acceptability of Three LED Fluorescent Microscopes in Zambia: Lessons Learnt for Scale-Up
title An Evaluation of the Performance and Acceptability of Three LED Fluorescent Microscopes in Zambia: Lessons Learnt for Scale-Up
title_full An Evaluation of the Performance and Acceptability of Three LED Fluorescent Microscopes in Zambia: Lessons Learnt for Scale-Up
title_fullStr An Evaluation of the Performance and Acceptability of Three LED Fluorescent Microscopes in Zambia: Lessons Learnt for Scale-Up
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of the Performance and Acceptability of Three LED Fluorescent Microscopes in Zambia: Lessons Learnt for Scale-Up
title_short An Evaluation of the Performance and Acceptability of Three LED Fluorescent Microscopes in Zambia: Lessons Learnt for Scale-Up
title_sort evaluation of the performance and acceptability of three led fluorescent microscopes in zambia: lessons learnt for scale-up
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3208552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22073271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027125
work_keys_str_mv AT turnbulleleanorr anevaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT kaundakaunda anevaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT harrisjenniferb anevaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT kapatanathan anevaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT muvwimimweembaw anevaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT kruunerannika anevaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT henostrozagerman anevaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT reidstewarte anevaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT turnbulleleanorr evaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT kaundakaunda evaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT harrisjenniferb evaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT kapatanathan evaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT muvwimimweembaw evaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT kruunerannika evaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT henostrozagerman evaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup
AT reidstewarte evaluationoftheperformanceandacceptabilityofthreeledfluorescentmicroscopesinzambialessonslearntforscaleup