Cargando…

Validation of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Quantification of Aortic Root Geometry: Comparison with Multi-Detector Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has been reported to be valuable for evaluating the geometry of cardiac chambers. We validated the accuracy of 3D transthoracic echocardiography for quantifying aortic root geometry in comparison with cardiac multi-detector computed tomography (MDC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jin-Sun, Choi, Yong-Woo, Shin, Jeoung-Sook, Yang, Hyoung-Mo, Lim, Hong-Seok, Choi, Byoung-Joo, Choi, So-Yeon, Yoon, Myeong-Ho, Hwang, Gyo-Seung, Tahk, Seung-Jea, Shin, Joon-Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Echocardiography 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3209591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22073322
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2011.19.3.128
_version_ 1782215678446534656
author Park, Jin-Sun
Choi, Yong-Woo
Shin, Jeoung-Sook
Yang, Hyoung-Mo
Lim, Hong-Seok
Choi, Byoung-Joo
Choi, So-Yeon
Yoon, Myeong-Ho
Hwang, Gyo-Seung
Tahk, Seung-Jea
Shin, Joon-Han
author_facet Park, Jin-Sun
Choi, Yong-Woo
Shin, Jeoung-Sook
Yang, Hyoung-Mo
Lim, Hong-Seok
Choi, Byoung-Joo
Choi, So-Yeon
Yoon, Myeong-Ho
Hwang, Gyo-Seung
Tahk, Seung-Jea
Shin, Joon-Han
author_sort Park, Jin-Sun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has been reported to be valuable for evaluating the geometry of cardiac chambers. We validated the accuracy of 3D transthoracic echocardiography for quantifying aortic root geometry in comparison with cardiac multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent cardiac MDCT and showed normal left ventricular ejection fraction (> 55%), as assessed by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography, were enrolled (12 male, mean 53 ± 9 years). We defined the aortic root volume as the volume from the aortic annulus to the sinotubular junction. The aortic root volume at end-diastole measured by both cardiac MDCT and 3D echocardiography was assessed. RESULTS: The cross-sectional area of the aortic root was asymmetric. At the annulus level, the cross-sectional area showed asymmetric triangle. From the aortic annulus to the most dilated point of the sinus of Valsalva, the asymmetric triangular shape was maintained. From the most dilated point of the sinus of Valsalva to the sinotubular junction, the cross-sectional shape of the aortic root changed to oval. The average aortic root volumes measured by 3D echocardiography (ARV-3DE) were 13.6 ± 4.8 mL at end-diastole and 14.1 ± 5.3 mL at end-systole, respectively. The average aortic root volume measured by MDCT at end-diastole (ARV-CT) was 14.1 ± 5.7 mL. At end-diastole, the ARV-3DE correlated well with the ARV-CT (R(2) = 0.926, difference = 0.5 ± 1.7 mL), and the two methods were in excellent agreement (the percent difference was 0%). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate both the feasibility and accuracy of 3D echocardiography for the clinical assessment of the geometry of the aortic root.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3209591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Korean Society of Echocardiography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32095912011-11-09 Validation of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Quantification of Aortic Root Geometry: Comparison with Multi-Detector Computed Tomography Park, Jin-Sun Choi, Yong-Woo Shin, Jeoung-Sook Yang, Hyoung-Mo Lim, Hong-Seok Choi, Byoung-Joo Choi, So-Yeon Yoon, Myeong-Ho Hwang, Gyo-Seung Tahk, Seung-Jea Shin, Joon-Han J Cardiovasc Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has been reported to be valuable for evaluating the geometry of cardiac chambers. We validated the accuracy of 3D transthoracic echocardiography for quantifying aortic root geometry in comparison with cardiac multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent cardiac MDCT and showed normal left ventricular ejection fraction (> 55%), as assessed by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography, were enrolled (12 male, mean 53 ± 9 years). We defined the aortic root volume as the volume from the aortic annulus to the sinotubular junction. The aortic root volume at end-diastole measured by both cardiac MDCT and 3D echocardiography was assessed. RESULTS: The cross-sectional area of the aortic root was asymmetric. At the annulus level, the cross-sectional area showed asymmetric triangle. From the aortic annulus to the most dilated point of the sinus of Valsalva, the asymmetric triangular shape was maintained. From the most dilated point of the sinus of Valsalva to the sinotubular junction, the cross-sectional shape of the aortic root changed to oval. The average aortic root volumes measured by 3D echocardiography (ARV-3DE) were 13.6 ± 4.8 mL at end-diastole and 14.1 ± 5.3 mL at end-systole, respectively. The average aortic root volume measured by MDCT at end-diastole (ARV-CT) was 14.1 ± 5.7 mL. At end-diastole, the ARV-3DE correlated well with the ARV-CT (R(2) = 0.926, difference = 0.5 ± 1.7 mL), and the two methods were in excellent agreement (the percent difference was 0%). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate both the feasibility and accuracy of 3D echocardiography for the clinical assessment of the geometry of the aortic root. Korean Society of Echocardiography 2011-09 2011-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3209591/ /pubmed/22073322 http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2011.19.3.128 Text en Copyright © 2011 Korean Society of Echocardiography http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Jin-Sun
Choi, Yong-Woo
Shin, Jeoung-Sook
Yang, Hyoung-Mo
Lim, Hong-Seok
Choi, Byoung-Joo
Choi, So-Yeon
Yoon, Myeong-Ho
Hwang, Gyo-Seung
Tahk, Seung-Jea
Shin, Joon-Han
Validation of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Quantification of Aortic Root Geometry: Comparison with Multi-Detector Computed Tomography
title Validation of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Quantification of Aortic Root Geometry: Comparison with Multi-Detector Computed Tomography
title_full Validation of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Quantification of Aortic Root Geometry: Comparison with Multi-Detector Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Validation of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Quantification of Aortic Root Geometry: Comparison with Multi-Detector Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Quantification of Aortic Root Geometry: Comparison with Multi-Detector Computed Tomography
title_short Validation of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Quantification of Aortic Root Geometry: Comparison with Multi-Detector Computed Tomography
title_sort validation of three-dimensional echocardiography for quantification of aortic root geometry: comparison with multi-detector computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3209591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22073322
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2011.19.3.128
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjinsun validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography
AT choiyongwoo validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography
AT shinjeoungsook validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography
AT yanghyoungmo validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography
AT limhongseok validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography
AT choibyoungjoo validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography
AT choisoyeon validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography
AT yoonmyeongho validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography
AT hwanggyoseung validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography
AT tahkseungjea validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography
AT shinjoonhan validationofthreedimensionalechocardiographyforquantificationofaorticrootgeometrycomparisonwithmultidetectorcomputedtomography