Cargando…

Psychometric Properties of the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ)

OBJECTIVES: The Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ) is a 50-item self-report questionnaire specifically developed for nurses and allied health professionals. Its seven subscales measure impairments in the work functioning due to common mental disorders. Aim of this study is to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gärtner, Fania R., Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen, van Dijk, Frank J. H., Sluiter, Judith K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3210752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22087231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026565
_version_ 1782215756164890624
author Gärtner, Fania R.
Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen
van Dijk, Frank J. H.
Sluiter, Judith K.
author_facet Gärtner, Fania R.
Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen
van Dijk, Frank J. H.
Sluiter, Judith K.
author_sort Gärtner, Fania R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ) is a 50-item self-report questionnaire specifically developed for nurses and allied health professionals. Its seven subscales measure impairments in the work functioning due to common mental disorders. Aim of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the NWFQ, by assessing reproducibility and construct validity. METHODS: The questionnaire was administered to 314 nurses and allied health professionals with a re-test in 112 subjects. Reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlations coefficients (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). For construct validity, correlations were calculated with a general work functioning scale, the Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS) (convergent validity) and with a physical functioning scale (divergent validity). For discriminative validity, a Mann Whitney U test was performed testing for significant differences between subjects with mental health complaints and without. RESULTS: All subscales showed good reliability (ICC: 0.72–0.86), except for one (ICC = 0.16). Convergent validity was good in six subscales, correlations ranged from 0.38–0.62. However, in one subscale the correlation with the EWPS was too low (0.22). Divergent validity was good in all subscales based on correlations ranged from (−0.06)–(−0.23). Discriminative validity was good in all subscales, based on significant differences between subjects with and without mental health complaints (p<0.001–p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The NWFQ demonstrates good psychometric properties, for six of the seven subscales. Subscale “impaired decision making” needs improvement before further use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3210752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32107522011-11-15 Psychometric Properties of the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ) Gärtner, Fania R. Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen van Dijk, Frank J. H. Sluiter, Judith K. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ) is a 50-item self-report questionnaire specifically developed for nurses and allied health professionals. Its seven subscales measure impairments in the work functioning due to common mental disorders. Aim of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the NWFQ, by assessing reproducibility and construct validity. METHODS: The questionnaire was administered to 314 nurses and allied health professionals with a re-test in 112 subjects. Reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlations coefficients (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). For construct validity, correlations were calculated with a general work functioning scale, the Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS) (convergent validity) and with a physical functioning scale (divergent validity). For discriminative validity, a Mann Whitney U test was performed testing for significant differences between subjects with mental health complaints and without. RESULTS: All subscales showed good reliability (ICC: 0.72–0.86), except for one (ICC = 0.16). Convergent validity was good in six subscales, correlations ranged from 0.38–0.62. However, in one subscale the correlation with the EWPS was too low (0.22). Divergent validity was good in all subscales based on correlations ranged from (−0.06)–(−0.23). Discriminative validity was good in all subscales, based on significant differences between subjects with and without mental health complaints (p<0.001–p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The NWFQ demonstrates good psychometric properties, for six of the seven subscales. Subscale “impaired decision making” needs improvement before further use. Public Library of Science 2011-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3210752/ /pubmed/22087231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026565 Text en Gärtner et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gärtner, Fania R.
Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen
van Dijk, Frank J. H.
Sluiter, Judith K.
Psychometric Properties of the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ)
title Psychometric Properties of the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ)
title_full Psychometric Properties of the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ)
title_fullStr Psychometric Properties of the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ)
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Properties of the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ)
title_short Psychometric Properties of the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ)
title_sort psychometric properties of the nurses work functioning questionnaire (nwfq)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3210752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22087231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026565
work_keys_str_mv AT gartnerfaniar psychometricpropertiesofthenursesworkfunctioningquestionnairenwfq
AT nieuwenhuijsenkaren psychometricpropertiesofthenursesworkfunctioningquestionnairenwfq
AT vandijkfrankjh psychometricpropertiesofthenursesworkfunctioningquestionnairenwfq
AT sluiterjudithk psychometricpropertiesofthenursesworkfunctioningquestionnairenwfq