Cargando…

The Potential Value of Near Patient Platelet Function Testing in PCI: Randomised Comparison of 600 mg versus 900 mg Clopidogrel Loading Doses

Whilst poor response to clopidogrel is associated with adverse outcomes uncertainty exists as to how (a) response should be assessed and (b) poor responders managed. We utilised VerifyNow P2Y12 and short Thrombelastography (TEG) to assess 900 mg doses in (i) initial poor responders to 600 mg and (ii...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hobson, Alex R., Qureshi, Zeshan, Banks, Phil, Curzen, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3211077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22084661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/908272
_version_ 1782215800418992128
author Hobson, Alex R.
Qureshi, Zeshan
Banks, Phil
Curzen, Nicholas
author_facet Hobson, Alex R.
Qureshi, Zeshan
Banks, Phil
Curzen, Nicholas
author_sort Hobson, Alex R.
collection PubMed
description Whilst poor response to clopidogrel is associated with adverse outcomes uncertainty exists as to how (a) response should be assessed and (b) poor responders managed. We utilised VerifyNow P2Y12 and short Thrombelastography (TEG) to assess 900 mg doses in (i) initial poor responders to 600 mg and (ii) in a randomised comparison with 600 mg. Blood was taken before and six hours post clopidogrel in (i) 30 volunteers receiving 600 mg (poor responders received 900 mg > two weeks later) and (ii) 60 patients randomized 1 : 1 to 600 mg or 900 mg doses. Poor response was defined as TEG %Clotting Inhibition (%CIn) or VerifyNow Platelet Response Unit (PRU) reduction <30%. (i) Poor responders to 600 mg had greater PRU reduction (45.0 versus 20.1%, P = 0.03) and greater %CIn (22.9 versus −15.1%, P = 0.01) after 900 mg but (ii) there were no significant differences between the patient groups. Near-patient assessment of response to clopidogrel is feasible and clinically useful. Whilst ineffective on a population basis 900 mg doses increase the effect of clopidogrel in initial poor responders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3211077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32110772011-11-14 The Potential Value of Near Patient Platelet Function Testing in PCI: Randomised Comparison of 600 mg versus 900 mg Clopidogrel Loading Doses Hobson, Alex R. Qureshi, Zeshan Banks, Phil Curzen, Nicholas Thrombosis Research Article Whilst poor response to clopidogrel is associated with adverse outcomes uncertainty exists as to how (a) response should be assessed and (b) poor responders managed. We utilised VerifyNow P2Y12 and short Thrombelastography (TEG) to assess 900 mg doses in (i) initial poor responders to 600 mg and (ii) in a randomised comparison with 600 mg. Blood was taken before and six hours post clopidogrel in (i) 30 volunteers receiving 600 mg (poor responders received 900 mg > two weeks later) and (ii) 60 patients randomized 1 : 1 to 600 mg or 900 mg doses. Poor response was defined as TEG %Clotting Inhibition (%CIn) or VerifyNow Platelet Response Unit (PRU) reduction <30%. (i) Poor responders to 600 mg had greater PRU reduction (45.0 versus 20.1%, P = 0.03) and greater %CIn (22.9 versus −15.1%, P = 0.01) after 900 mg but (ii) there were no significant differences between the patient groups. Near-patient assessment of response to clopidogrel is feasible and clinically useful. Whilst ineffective on a population basis 900 mg doses increase the effect of clopidogrel in initial poor responders. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2009-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3211077/ /pubmed/22084661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/908272 Text en Copyright © 2010 Alex R. Hobson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hobson, Alex R.
Qureshi, Zeshan
Banks, Phil
Curzen, Nicholas
The Potential Value of Near Patient Platelet Function Testing in PCI: Randomised Comparison of 600 mg versus 900 mg Clopidogrel Loading Doses
title The Potential Value of Near Patient Platelet Function Testing in PCI: Randomised Comparison of 600 mg versus 900 mg Clopidogrel Loading Doses
title_full The Potential Value of Near Patient Platelet Function Testing in PCI: Randomised Comparison of 600 mg versus 900 mg Clopidogrel Loading Doses
title_fullStr The Potential Value of Near Patient Platelet Function Testing in PCI: Randomised Comparison of 600 mg versus 900 mg Clopidogrel Loading Doses
title_full_unstemmed The Potential Value of Near Patient Platelet Function Testing in PCI: Randomised Comparison of 600 mg versus 900 mg Clopidogrel Loading Doses
title_short The Potential Value of Near Patient Platelet Function Testing in PCI: Randomised Comparison of 600 mg versus 900 mg Clopidogrel Loading Doses
title_sort potential value of near patient platelet function testing in pci: randomised comparison of 600 mg versus 900 mg clopidogrel loading doses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3211077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22084661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/908272
work_keys_str_mv AT hobsonalexr thepotentialvalueofnearpatientplateletfunctiontestinginpcirandomisedcomparisonof600mgversus900mgclopidogrelloadingdoses
AT qureshizeshan thepotentialvalueofnearpatientplateletfunctiontestinginpcirandomisedcomparisonof600mgversus900mgclopidogrelloadingdoses
AT banksphil thepotentialvalueofnearpatientplateletfunctiontestinginpcirandomisedcomparisonof600mgversus900mgclopidogrelloadingdoses
AT curzennicholas thepotentialvalueofnearpatientplateletfunctiontestinginpcirandomisedcomparisonof600mgversus900mgclopidogrelloadingdoses
AT hobsonalexr potentialvalueofnearpatientplateletfunctiontestinginpcirandomisedcomparisonof600mgversus900mgclopidogrelloadingdoses
AT qureshizeshan potentialvalueofnearpatientplateletfunctiontestinginpcirandomisedcomparisonof600mgversus900mgclopidogrelloadingdoses
AT banksphil potentialvalueofnearpatientplateletfunctiontestinginpcirandomisedcomparisonof600mgversus900mgclopidogrelloadingdoses
AT curzennicholas potentialvalueofnearpatientplateletfunctiontestinginpcirandomisedcomparisonof600mgversus900mgclopidogrelloadingdoses