Cargando…
Bilingualism and Creativity: Benefits in Convergent Thinking Come with Losses in Divergent Thinking
Bilingualism is commonly assumed to improve creativity but the mechanisms underlying creative acts, and the way these mechanisms are affected by bilingualism, are not very well understood. We hypothesize that learning to master multiple languages drives individuals toward a relatively focused cognit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22084634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00273 |
_version_ | 1782216017421795328 |
---|---|
author | Hommel, Bernhard Colzato, Lorenza S. Fischer, Rico Christoffels, Ingrid K. |
author_facet | Hommel, Bernhard Colzato, Lorenza S. Fischer, Rico Christoffels, Ingrid K. |
author_sort | Hommel, Bernhard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bilingualism is commonly assumed to improve creativity but the mechanisms underlying creative acts, and the way these mechanisms are affected by bilingualism, are not very well understood. We hypothesize that learning to master multiple languages drives individuals toward a relatively focused cognitive-control state that exerts strong top-down impact on information processing and creates strong local competition for selection between cognitive codes. Considering the control requirements posed by creativity tasks tapping into convergent and divergent thinking, this predicts that high-proficient bilinguals should outperform low-proficient bilinguals in convergent thinking, while low-proficient bilinguals might be better in divergent thinking. Comparing low- and high-proficient bilinguals on convergent-thinking and divergent-thinking tasks indeed showed a high-proficient bilingual advantage for convergent thinking but a low-proficient bilingual advantage for fluency in divergent thinking. These findings suggest that bilingualism should not be related to “creativity” as a unitary concept but, rather, to the specific processes and mechanisms that underlie creativity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3212749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32127492011-11-14 Bilingualism and Creativity: Benefits in Convergent Thinking Come with Losses in Divergent Thinking Hommel, Bernhard Colzato, Lorenza S. Fischer, Rico Christoffels, Ingrid K. Front Psychol Psychology Bilingualism is commonly assumed to improve creativity but the mechanisms underlying creative acts, and the way these mechanisms are affected by bilingualism, are not very well understood. We hypothesize that learning to master multiple languages drives individuals toward a relatively focused cognitive-control state that exerts strong top-down impact on information processing and creates strong local competition for selection between cognitive codes. Considering the control requirements posed by creativity tasks tapping into convergent and divergent thinking, this predicts that high-proficient bilinguals should outperform low-proficient bilinguals in convergent thinking, while low-proficient bilinguals might be better in divergent thinking. Comparing low- and high-proficient bilinguals on convergent-thinking and divergent-thinking tasks indeed showed a high-proficient bilingual advantage for convergent thinking but a low-proficient bilingual advantage for fluency in divergent thinking. These findings suggest that bilingualism should not be related to “creativity” as a unitary concept but, rather, to the specific processes and mechanisms that underlie creativity. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3212749/ /pubmed/22084634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00273 Text en Copyright © 2011 Hommel, Colzato, Fischer and Christoffels. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hommel, Bernhard Colzato, Lorenza S. Fischer, Rico Christoffels, Ingrid K. Bilingualism and Creativity: Benefits in Convergent Thinking Come with Losses in Divergent Thinking |
title | Bilingualism and Creativity: Benefits in Convergent Thinking Come with Losses in Divergent Thinking |
title_full | Bilingualism and Creativity: Benefits in Convergent Thinking Come with Losses in Divergent Thinking |
title_fullStr | Bilingualism and Creativity: Benefits in Convergent Thinking Come with Losses in Divergent Thinking |
title_full_unstemmed | Bilingualism and Creativity: Benefits in Convergent Thinking Come with Losses in Divergent Thinking |
title_short | Bilingualism and Creativity: Benefits in Convergent Thinking Come with Losses in Divergent Thinking |
title_sort | bilingualism and creativity: benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22084634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hommelbernhard bilingualismandcreativitybenefitsinconvergentthinkingcomewithlossesindivergentthinking AT colzatolorenzas bilingualismandcreativitybenefitsinconvergentthinkingcomewithlossesindivergentthinking AT fischerrico bilingualismandcreativitybenefitsinconvergentthinkingcomewithlossesindivergentthinking AT christoffelsingridk bilingualismandcreativitybenefitsinconvergentthinkingcomewithlossesindivergentthinking |