Cargando…

How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness?

BACKGROUND: In chronic liver diseases, a correct estimation of the severity of liver fibrosis is important for recommendations regarding the treatment. Nowadays, evaluation of fibrosis is done by noninvasive methods such as biochemical scores and transient elastography instead of liver biopsy. The l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sporea, Ioan, Badea, Radu, Sirli, Roxana, Lupsor, Monica, Popescu, Alina, Danila, Mirela, Focsa, Mircea, Deleanu, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22087190
_version_ 1782216018518605824
author Sporea, Ioan
Badea, Radu
Sirli, Roxana
Lupsor, Monica
Popescu, Alina
Danila, Mirela
Focsa, Mircea
Deleanu, Alexandra
author_facet Sporea, Ioan
Badea, Radu
Sirli, Roxana
Lupsor, Monica
Popescu, Alina
Danila, Mirela
Focsa, Mircea
Deleanu, Alexandra
author_sort Sporea, Ioan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In chronic liver diseases, a correct estimation of the severity of liver fibrosis is important for recommendations regarding the treatment. Nowadays, evaluation of fibrosis is done by noninvasive methods such as biochemical scores and transient elastography instead of liver biopsy. The lack of sensitivity to detect fibrosis, because of its heterogeneity is a drawback of liver biopsy (LB). OBJECTIVES: To compare transient elastography (TE) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) for the evaluation of liver stiffness (LS), against percutaneous LB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study comprised of 223 subjects; 52 without fibrosis (38 volunteers and 14 patients with F0 on LB), 36 with F1, 40 with F2, 26 with F3 and 69 with liver cirrhosis (46 with LB and 23 with signs of cirrhosis). For each patient we performed in the same session 10 TE and 5 ARFI measurements. The median values were calculated. RESULTS: A strong linear correlation (Spearman rho = 0.870) was found between TE and fibrosis (P < 0.0001); there was also a weaker correlation between ARFI and fibrosis (Spearman rho = 0.646; P < 0.0001). TE measurements were also correlated with ARFI measurements (Spearman rho = 0.733, P < 0.0001). The best test for predicting significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was TE with a cut-off value of 7.1 kPa (AUROC 0.953). For ARFI, the cut-off value was 1.27 m/s-area under ROC curve (AUROC): 0.890, sensitivity (Se) of 88.7%, specificity (Sp) of 67.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 64.5%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90% (P = 0.0044). For predicting cirrhosis (F = 4), the optimum cut-off values were 14.4 kPa for TE (AUROC: 0.985, Se: 95.6%, Sp: 94.7%, PPV: 89.2%, NPV: 98%) and 1.7 m/s for ARFI (AUROC: 0.931, Se: 93%, Sp: 86.7%, PPV: 73.6%, NPV: 96.9%) (P = 0.0102). CONCLUSIONS: LS evaluation by means of ARFI is not superior to TE for the assessment of liver fibrosis. ARFI is an accurate test for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3212759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32127592011-11-15 How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness? Sporea, Ioan Badea, Radu Sirli, Roxana Lupsor, Monica Popescu, Alina Danila, Mirela Focsa, Mircea Deleanu, Alexandra Hepat Mon Original Article BACKGROUND: In chronic liver diseases, a correct estimation of the severity of liver fibrosis is important for recommendations regarding the treatment. Nowadays, evaluation of fibrosis is done by noninvasive methods such as biochemical scores and transient elastography instead of liver biopsy. The lack of sensitivity to detect fibrosis, because of its heterogeneity is a drawback of liver biopsy (LB). OBJECTIVES: To compare transient elastography (TE) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) for the evaluation of liver stiffness (LS), against percutaneous LB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study comprised of 223 subjects; 52 without fibrosis (38 volunteers and 14 patients with F0 on LB), 36 with F1, 40 with F2, 26 with F3 and 69 with liver cirrhosis (46 with LB and 23 with signs of cirrhosis). For each patient we performed in the same session 10 TE and 5 ARFI measurements. The median values were calculated. RESULTS: A strong linear correlation (Spearman rho = 0.870) was found between TE and fibrosis (P < 0.0001); there was also a weaker correlation between ARFI and fibrosis (Spearman rho = 0.646; P < 0.0001). TE measurements were also correlated with ARFI measurements (Spearman rho = 0.733, P < 0.0001). The best test for predicting significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was TE with a cut-off value of 7.1 kPa (AUROC 0.953). For ARFI, the cut-off value was 1.27 m/s-area under ROC curve (AUROC): 0.890, sensitivity (Se) of 88.7%, specificity (Sp) of 67.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 64.5%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90% (P = 0.0044). For predicting cirrhosis (F = 4), the optimum cut-off values were 14.4 kPa for TE (AUROC: 0.985, Se: 95.6%, Sp: 94.7%, PPV: 89.2%, NPV: 98%) and 1.7 m/s for ARFI (AUROC: 0.931, Se: 93%, Sp: 86.7%, PPV: 73.6%, NPV: 96.9%) (P = 0.0102). CONCLUSIONS: LS evaluation by means of ARFI is not superior to TE for the assessment of liver fibrosis. ARFI is an accurate test for the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Kowsar 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3212759/ /pubmed/22087190 Text en Copyright © 2011, Kowsar M.P. Co. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sporea, Ioan
Badea, Radu
Sirli, Roxana
Lupsor, Monica
Popescu, Alina
Danila, Mirela
Focsa, Mircea
Deleanu, Alexandra
How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness?
title How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness?
title_full How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness?
title_fullStr How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness?
title_full_unstemmed How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness?
title_short How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness?
title_sort how efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22087190
work_keys_str_mv AT sporeaioan howefficientisacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyfortheevaluationofliverstiffness
AT badearadu howefficientisacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyfortheevaluationofliverstiffness
AT sirliroxana howefficientisacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyfortheevaluationofliverstiffness
AT lupsormonica howefficientisacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyfortheevaluationofliverstiffness
AT popescualina howefficientisacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyfortheevaluationofliverstiffness
AT danilamirela howefficientisacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyfortheevaluationofliverstiffness
AT focsamircea howefficientisacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyfortheevaluationofliverstiffness
AT deleanualexandra howefficientisacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyfortheevaluationofliverstiffness