Cargando…

The TOPSHOCK study: Effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy compared to focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopath - design of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy is a chronic overuse injury of the patellar tendon that is especially prevalent in people who are involved in jumping activities. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy is a relatively new treatment modality for tendinopathies. It seems to be a safe and promising part of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Worp, Henk, Zwerver, Johannes, van den Akker-Scheek, Inge, Diercks, Ron L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21989041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-229
_version_ 1782216030124244992
author van der Worp, Henk
Zwerver, Johannes
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Diercks, Ron L
author_facet van der Worp, Henk
Zwerver, Johannes
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Diercks, Ron L
author_sort van der Worp, Henk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy is a chronic overuse injury of the patellar tendon that is especially prevalent in people who are involved in jumping activities. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy is a relatively new treatment modality for tendinopathies. It seems to be a safe and promising part of the rehabilitation program for patellar tendinopathy. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy originally used focused shockwaves. Several years ago a new kind of shockwave therapy was introduced: radial shockwave therapy. Studies that investigate the effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy as treatment for patellar tendinopathy are scarce. Therefore the aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of focussed shockwave therapy and radial shockwave therapy as treatments for patellar tendinopathy. METHODS/DESIGN: The TOPSHOCK study (Tendinopathy Of Patella SHOCKwave) is a two-armed randomised controlled trial in which the effectiveness of focussed shockwave therapy and radial shockwave therapy are directly compared. Outcome assessors and patients are blinded as to which treatment is given. Patients undergo three sessions of either focused shockwave therapy or radial shockwave therapy at 1-week intervals, both in combination with eccentric decline squat training. Follow-up measurements are scheduled just before treatments 2 and 3, and 1, 4, 7 and 12 weeks after the final treatment. The main outcome measure is the Dutch VISA-P questionnaire, which asks for pain, function and sports participation in subjects with patellar tendinopathy. Secondary outcome measures are pain determined with a VAS during ADL, sports and decline squats, rating of subjective improvement and overall satisfaction with the treatment. Patients will also record their sports activities, pain during and after these activities, and concurrent medical treatment on a weekly basis in a web-based diary. Results will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: The TOPSHOCK study is the first randomised controlled trial that directly compares the effectiveness of focused shockwave therapy and radial shockwave therapy, both in combination with eccentric decline squat training, for treating patellar tendinopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number NTR2774.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3212818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32128182011-11-11 The TOPSHOCK study: Effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy compared to focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopath - design of a randomised controlled trial van der Worp, Henk Zwerver, Johannes van den Akker-Scheek, Inge Diercks, Ron L BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy is a chronic overuse injury of the patellar tendon that is especially prevalent in people who are involved in jumping activities. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy is a relatively new treatment modality for tendinopathies. It seems to be a safe and promising part of the rehabilitation program for patellar tendinopathy. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy originally used focused shockwaves. Several years ago a new kind of shockwave therapy was introduced: radial shockwave therapy. Studies that investigate the effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy as treatment for patellar tendinopathy are scarce. Therefore the aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of focussed shockwave therapy and radial shockwave therapy as treatments for patellar tendinopathy. METHODS/DESIGN: The TOPSHOCK study (Tendinopathy Of Patella SHOCKwave) is a two-armed randomised controlled trial in which the effectiveness of focussed shockwave therapy and radial shockwave therapy are directly compared. Outcome assessors and patients are blinded as to which treatment is given. Patients undergo three sessions of either focused shockwave therapy or radial shockwave therapy at 1-week intervals, both in combination with eccentric decline squat training. Follow-up measurements are scheduled just before treatments 2 and 3, and 1, 4, 7 and 12 weeks after the final treatment. The main outcome measure is the Dutch VISA-P questionnaire, which asks for pain, function and sports participation in subjects with patellar tendinopathy. Secondary outcome measures are pain determined with a VAS during ADL, sports and decline squats, rating of subjective improvement and overall satisfaction with the treatment. Patients will also record their sports activities, pain during and after these activities, and concurrent medical treatment on a weekly basis in a web-based diary. Results will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: The TOPSHOCK study is the first randomised controlled trial that directly compares the effectiveness of focused shockwave therapy and radial shockwave therapy, both in combination with eccentric decline squat training, for treating patellar tendinopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number NTR2774. BioMed Central 2011-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3212818/ /pubmed/21989041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-229 Text en Copyright ©2011 van der Worp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van der Worp, Henk
Zwerver, Johannes
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Diercks, Ron L
The TOPSHOCK study: Effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy compared to focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopath - design of a randomised controlled trial
title The TOPSHOCK study: Effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy compared to focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopath - design of a randomised controlled trial
title_full The TOPSHOCK study: Effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy compared to focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopath - design of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The TOPSHOCK study: Effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy compared to focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopath - design of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The TOPSHOCK study: Effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy compared to focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopath - design of a randomised controlled trial
title_short The TOPSHOCK study: Effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy compared to focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopath - design of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort topshock study: effectiveness of radial shockwave therapy compared to focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopath - design of a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21989041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-229
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderworphenk thetopshockstudyeffectivenessofradialshockwavetherapycomparedtofocusedshockwavetherapyfortreatingpatellartendinopathdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zwerverjohannes thetopshockstudyeffectivenessofradialshockwavetherapycomparedtofocusedshockwavetherapyfortreatingpatellartendinopathdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenakkerscheekinge thetopshockstudyeffectivenessofradialshockwavetherapycomparedtofocusedshockwavetherapyfortreatingpatellartendinopathdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT diercksronl thetopshockstudyeffectivenessofradialshockwavetherapycomparedtofocusedshockwavetherapyfortreatingpatellartendinopathdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderworphenk topshockstudyeffectivenessofradialshockwavetherapycomparedtofocusedshockwavetherapyfortreatingpatellartendinopathdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zwerverjohannes topshockstudyeffectivenessofradialshockwavetherapycomparedtofocusedshockwavetherapyfortreatingpatellartendinopathdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenakkerscheekinge topshockstudyeffectivenessofradialshockwavetherapycomparedtofocusedshockwavetherapyfortreatingpatellartendinopathdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT diercksronl topshockstudyeffectivenessofradialshockwavetherapycomparedtofocusedshockwavetherapyfortreatingpatellartendinopathdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial