Cargando…

Efficacy of the EZ-IO(® )needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Intraosseous (IO) access represents a reliable alternative to intravenous vascular access and is explicitly recommended in the current guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council when intravenous access is difficult or impossible. We therefore aimed to study the efficacy of the intr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schalk, Richard, Schweigkofler, Uwe, Lotz, Gösta, Zacharowski, Kai, Latasch, Leo, Byhahn, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22029625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-65
_version_ 1782216037918310400
author Schalk, Richard
Schweigkofler, Uwe
Lotz, Gösta
Zacharowski, Kai
Latasch, Leo
Byhahn, Christian
author_facet Schalk, Richard
Schweigkofler, Uwe
Lotz, Gösta
Zacharowski, Kai
Latasch, Leo
Byhahn, Christian
author_sort Schalk, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraosseous (IO) access represents a reliable alternative to intravenous vascular access and is explicitly recommended in the current guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council when intravenous access is difficult or impossible. We therefore aimed to study the efficacy of the intraosseous needle driver EZ-IO(® )in the prehospital setting. METHODS: During a 24-month period, all cases of prehospital IO access using the EZ-IO(® )needle driver within three operational areas of emergency medical services were prospectively recorded by a standardized questionnaire that needed to be filled out by the rescuer immediately after the mission and sent to the primary investigator. We determined the rate of successful insertion of the IO needle, the time required, immediate procedure-related complications, the level of previous experience with IO access, and operator's subjective satisfaction with the device. RESULTS: 77 IO needle insertions were performed in 69 adults and five infants and children by emergency physicians (n = 72 applications) and paramedics (n = 5 applications). Needle placement was successful at the first attempt in all but 2 adults (one patient with unrecognized total knee arthroplasty, one case of needle obstruction after placement). The majority of users (92%) were relative novices with less than five previous IO needle placements. Of 22 responsive patients, 18 reported pain upon fluid administration via the needle. The rescuers' subjective rating regarding handling of the device and ease of needle insertion, as described by means of an analogue scale (0 = entirely unsatisfied, 10 = most satisfied), provided a median score of 10 (range 1-10). CONCLUSIONS: The EZ-IO(® )needle driver was an efficient alternative to establish immediate out-of-hospital vascular access. However, significant pain upon intramedullary infusion was observed in the majority of responsive patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3212886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32128862011-11-11 Efficacy of the EZ-IO(® )needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study Schalk, Richard Schweigkofler, Uwe Lotz, Gösta Zacharowski, Kai Latasch, Leo Byhahn, Christian Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Intraosseous (IO) access represents a reliable alternative to intravenous vascular access and is explicitly recommended in the current guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council when intravenous access is difficult or impossible. We therefore aimed to study the efficacy of the intraosseous needle driver EZ-IO(® )in the prehospital setting. METHODS: During a 24-month period, all cases of prehospital IO access using the EZ-IO(® )needle driver within three operational areas of emergency medical services were prospectively recorded by a standardized questionnaire that needed to be filled out by the rescuer immediately after the mission and sent to the primary investigator. We determined the rate of successful insertion of the IO needle, the time required, immediate procedure-related complications, the level of previous experience with IO access, and operator's subjective satisfaction with the device. RESULTS: 77 IO needle insertions were performed in 69 adults and five infants and children by emergency physicians (n = 72 applications) and paramedics (n = 5 applications). Needle placement was successful at the first attempt in all but 2 adults (one patient with unrecognized total knee arthroplasty, one case of needle obstruction after placement). The majority of users (92%) were relative novices with less than five previous IO needle placements. Of 22 responsive patients, 18 reported pain upon fluid administration via the needle. The rescuers' subjective rating regarding handling of the device and ease of needle insertion, as described by means of an analogue scale (0 = entirely unsatisfied, 10 = most satisfied), provided a median score of 10 (range 1-10). CONCLUSIONS: The EZ-IO(® )needle driver was an efficient alternative to establish immediate out-of-hospital vascular access. However, significant pain upon intramedullary infusion was observed in the majority of responsive patients. BioMed Central 2011-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3212886/ /pubmed/22029625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-65 Text en Copyright ©2011 Schalk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Schalk, Richard
Schweigkofler, Uwe
Lotz, Gösta
Zacharowski, Kai
Latasch, Leo
Byhahn, Christian
Efficacy of the EZ-IO(® )needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title Efficacy of the EZ-IO(® )needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title_full Efficacy of the EZ-IO(® )needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title_fullStr Efficacy of the EZ-IO(® )needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of the EZ-IO(® )needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title_short Efficacy of the EZ-IO(® )needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title_sort efficacy of the ez-io(® )needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22029625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-65
work_keys_str_mv AT schalkrichard efficacyoftheezioneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy
AT schweigkofleruwe efficacyoftheezioneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy
AT lotzgosta efficacyoftheezioneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy
AT zacharowskikai efficacyoftheezioneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy
AT lataschleo efficacyoftheezioneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy
AT byhahnchristian efficacyoftheezioneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy