Cargando…

Development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: Study Protocol

BACKGROUND: Frail older people admitted to acute care hospitals are at risk of a range of adverse outcomes, including geriatric syndromes, although targeted care strategies can improve health outcomes for these patients. It is therefore important to assess inter-hospital variation in performance in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brand, Caroline A, Martin-Khan, Melinda, Wright, Olivia, Jones, Richard N, Morris, John N, Travers, Catherine M, Tropea, Joannne, Gray, Leonard C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22014061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-281
_version_ 1782216053198159872
author Brand, Caroline A
Martin-Khan, Melinda
Wright, Olivia
Jones, Richard N
Morris, John N
Travers, Catherine M
Tropea, Joannne
Gray, Leonard C
author_facet Brand, Caroline A
Martin-Khan, Melinda
Wright, Olivia
Jones, Richard N
Morris, John N
Travers, Catherine M
Tropea, Joannne
Gray, Leonard C
author_sort Brand, Caroline A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frail older people admitted to acute care hospitals are at risk of a range of adverse outcomes, including geriatric syndromes, although targeted care strategies can improve health outcomes for these patients. It is therefore important to assess inter-hospital variation in performance in order to plan and resource improvement programs. Clinical quality outcome indicators provide a mechanism for identifying variation in performance over time and between hospitals, however to date there has been no routine use of such indicators in acute care settings. A barrier to using quality indicators is lack of access to routinely collected clinical data. The interRAI Acute Care (AC) assessment system supports comprehensive geriatric assessment of older people within routine daily practice in hospital and includes process and outcome data pertaining to geriatric syndromes. This paper reports the study protocol for the development of aged care quality indicators for acute care hospitals. METHODS/DESIGN: The study will be conducted in three phases: 1. Development of a preliminary inclusive set of quality indicators set based on a literature review and expert panel consultation, 2. A prospective field study including recruitment of 480 patients aged 70 years or older across 9 Australian hospitals. Each patient will be assessed on admission and discharge using the interRAI AC, and will undergo daily monitoring to observe outcomes. Medical records will be independently audited, and 3. Analysis and compilation of a definitive quality indicator set, including two anonymous voting rounds for quality indicator inclusion by the expert panel. DISCUSSION: The approach to quality indicators proposed in this protocol has four distinct advantages over previous efforts: the quality indicators focus on outcomes; they can be collected as part of a routinely applied clinical information and decision support system; the clinical data will be robust and will contribute to better understanding variations in hospital care of older patients; The quality indicators will have international relevance as they will be built on the interRAI assessment instrument, an internationally recognised clinical system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3212964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32129642011-11-11 Development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: Study Protocol Brand, Caroline A Martin-Khan, Melinda Wright, Olivia Jones, Richard N Morris, John N Travers, Catherine M Tropea, Joannne Gray, Leonard C BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Frail older people admitted to acute care hospitals are at risk of a range of adverse outcomes, including geriatric syndromes, although targeted care strategies can improve health outcomes for these patients. It is therefore important to assess inter-hospital variation in performance in order to plan and resource improvement programs. Clinical quality outcome indicators provide a mechanism for identifying variation in performance over time and between hospitals, however to date there has been no routine use of such indicators in acute care settings. A barrier to using quality indicators is lack of access to routinely collected clinical data. The interRAI Acute Care (AC) assessment system supports comprehensive geriatric assessment of older people within routine daily practice in hospital and includes process and outcome data pertaining to geriatric syndromes. This paper reports the study protocol for the development of aged care quality indicators for acute care hospitals. METHODS/DESIGN: The study will be conducted in three phases: 1. Development of a preliminary inclusive set of quality indicators set based on a literature review and expert panel consultation, 2. A prospective field study including recruitment of 480 patients aged 70 years or older across 9 Australian hospitals. Each patient will be assessed on admission and discharge using the interRAI AC, and will undergo daily monitoring to observe outcomes. Medical records will be independently audited, and 3. Analysis and compilation of a definitive quality indicator set, including two anonymous voting rounds for quality indicator inclusion by the expert panel. DISCUSSION: The approach to quality indicators proposed in this protocol has four distinct advantages over previous efforts: the quality indicators focus on outcomes; they can be collected as part of a routinely applied clinical information and decision support system; the clinical data will be robust and will contribute to better understanding variations in hospital care of older patients; The quality indicators will have international relevance as they will be built on the interRAI assessment instrument, an internationally recognised clinical system. BioMed Central 2011-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3212964/ /pubmed/22014061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-281 Text en Copyright ©2011 Brand et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Brand, Caroline A
Martin-Khan, Melinda
Wright, Olivia
Jones, Richard N
Morris, John N
Travers, Catherine M
Tropea, Joannne
Gray, Leonard C
Development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: Study Protocol
title Development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: Study Protocol
title_full Development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: Study Protocol
title_fullStr Development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: Study Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: Study Protocol
title_short Development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: Study Protocol
title_sort development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22014061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-281
work_keys_str_mv AT brandcarolinea developmentofqualityindicatorsformonitoringoutcomesoffrailelderlyhospitalisedinacutecarehealthsettingsstudyprotocol
AT martinkhanmelinda developmentofqualityindicatorsformonitoringoutcomesoffrailelderlyhospitalisedinacutecarehealthsettingsstudyprotocol
AT wrightolivia developmentofqualityindicatorsformonitoringoutcomesoffrailelderlyhospitalisedinacutecarehealthsettingsstudyprotocol
AT jonesrichardn developmentofqualityindicatorsformonitoringoutcomesoffrailelderlyhospitalisedinacutecarehealthsettingsstudyprotocol
AT morrisjohnn developmentofqualityindicatorsformonitoringoutcomesoffrailelderlyhospitalisedinacutecarehealthsettingsstudyprotocol
AT traverscatherinem developmentofqualityindicatorsformonitoringoutcomesoffrailelderlyhospitalisedinacutecarehealthsettingsstudyprotocol
AT tropeajoannne developmentofqualityindicatorsformonitoringoutcomesoffrailelderlyhospitalisedinacutecarehealthsettingsstudyprotocol
AT grayleonardc developmentofqualityindicatorsformonitoringoutcomesoffrailelderlyhospitalisedinacutecarehealthsettingsstudyprotocol