Cargando…

Pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )and other formulations of long-acting octreotide

BACKGROUND: Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )(Novartis Pharma AG) is a long-acting repeatable formulation of the somatostatin analogue octreotide, the safety and efficacy of which has been established through 15 years of clinical experience. Recently, other formulations of octreotide using polymer poly(lactic-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petersen, Holger, Bizec, Jean-Claude, Schuetz, Helmut, Delporte, Marie-Laure
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21906300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-344
_version_ 1782216058174701568
author Petersen, Holger
Bizec, Jean-Claude
Schuetz, Helmut
Delporte, Marie-Laure
author_facet Petersen, Holger
Bizec, Jean-Claude
Schuetz, Helmut
Delporte, Marie-Laure
author_sort Petersen, Holger
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )(Novartis Pharma AG) is a long-acting repeatable formulation of the somatostatin analogue octreotide, the safety and efficacy of which has been established through 15 years of clinical experience. Recently, other formulations of octreotide using polymer poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) technology have been developed. This study compares the composition and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of Sandostatin LAR with three other versions of the depot delivery system (formulations A, B and C, available in selected countries). FINDINGS: Sandostatin LAR exhibited a characteristic concentration-time profile with a limited initial release of octreotide ('burst'), an erosion phase from weeks 3-5, and a slowly declining concentration to day 52. The PK profiles of formulations A and B were characterized by a large initial burst during days 0-2, with up to 41% of the overall area under the plasma-concentration time curve achieved. Low and variable octreotide concentrations were observed during the microparticle erosion phase (days 2-62 [day 82 formulation C]) for formulations A, B and C. Sandostatin LAR microparticles are spherical in shape with an average diameter of approximately 50 μm, determined by scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Formulation A had smaller, irregular microparticles, and formulations B and C exhibited a large range of particle diameters (< 20 to > 100 μm). Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy detected a high tin content of 104 mg/kg in formulation B, the presence of which may suggest inadequate purification following polymer synthesis using tin(II)-octoate as catalyst. PK profiles for formulations A, B and C after a single intramuscular injection of 4 mg/kg in male New Zealand rabbits differed markedly from the PK profile of Sandostatin LAR. CONCLUSIONS: Clear differences were seen between Sandostatin LAR and formulations A, B and C, including variations in microparticle size, shape and impurity content. Considering the significant differences in the octreotide release profile between Sandostatin LAR and the other formulations, the safety and efficacy of the other formulations cannot be inferred from the Sandostatin LAR efficacy and safety profile; each of these other formulations should be assessed accordingly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3212992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32129922011-11-11 Pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )and other formulations of long-acting octreotide Petersen, Holger Bizec, Jean-Claude Schuetz, Helmut Delporte, Marie-Laure BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )(Novartis Pharma AG) is a long-acting repeatable formulation of the somatostatin analogue octreotide, the safety and efficacy of which has been established through 15 years of clinical experience. Recently, other formulations of octreotide using polymer poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) technology have been developed. This study compares the composition and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of Sandostatin LAR with three other versions of the depot delivery system (formulations A, B and C, available in selected countries). FINDINGS: Sandostatin LAR exhibited a characteristic concentration-time profile with a limited initial release of octreotide ('burst'), an erosion phase from weeks 3-5, and a slowly declining concentration to day 52. The PK profiles of formulations A and B were characterized by a large initial burst during days 0-2, with up to 41% of the overall area under the plasma-concentration time curve achieved. Low and variable octreotide concentrations were observed during the microparticle erosion phase (days 2-62 [day 82 formulation C]) for formulations A, B and C. Sandostatin LAR microparticles are spherical in shape with an average diameter of approximately 50 μm, determined by scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Formulation A had smaller, irregular microparticles, and formulations B and C exhibited a large range of particle diameters (< 20 to > 100 μm). Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy detected a high tin content of 104 mg/kg in formulation B, the presence of which may suggest inadequate purification following polymer synthesis using tin(II)-octoate as catalyst. PK profiles for formulations A, B and C after a single intramuscular injection of 4 mg/kg in male New Zealand rabbits differed markedly from the PK profile of Sandostatin LAR. CONCLUSIONS: Clear differences were seen between Sandostatin LAR and formulations A, B and C, including variations in microparticle size, shape and impurity content. Considering the significant differences in the octreotide release profile between Sandostatin LAR and the other formulations, the safety and efficacy of the other formulations cannot be inferred from the Sandostatin LAR efficacy and safety profile; each of these other formulations should be assessed accordingly. BioMed Central 2011-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3212992/ /pubmed/21906300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-344 Text en Copyright ©2011 Petersen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Petersen, Holger
Bizec, Jean-Claude
Schuetz, Helmut
Delporte, Marie-Laure
Pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )and other formulations of long-acting octreotide
title Pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )and other formulations of long-acting octreotide
title_full Pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )and other formulations of long-acting octreotide
title_fullStr Pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )and other formulations of long-acting octreotide
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )and other formulations of long-acting octreotide
title_short Pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of Sandostatin(® )LAR(® )and other formulations of long-acting octreotide
title_sort pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of sandostatin(® )lar(® )and other formulations of long-acting octreotide
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3212992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21906300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-344
work_keys_str_mv AT petersenholger pharmacokineticandtechnicalcomparisonofsandostatinlarandotherformulationsoflongactingoctreotide
AT bizecjeanclaude pharmacokineticandtechnicalcomparisonofsandostatinlarandotherformulationsoflongactingoctreotide
AT schuetzhelmut pharmacokineticandtechnicalcomparisonofsandostatinlarandotherformulationsoflongactingoctreotide
AT delportemarielaure pharmacokineticandtechnicalcomparisonofsandostatinlarandotherformulationsoflongactingoctreotide