Cargando…
Analysis of induced electrical currents from magnetic field coupling inside implantable neurostimulator leads
BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, the number of neurostimulator systems implanted in patients has been rapidly growing. Nearly 50, 000 neurostimulators are implanted worldwide annually. The most common type of implantable neurostimulators is indicated for pain relief. At the same time, commercial us...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3213036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22014169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-10-94 |
_version_ | 1782216065750663168 |
---|---|
author | Pantchenko, Oxana S Seidman, Seth J Guag, Joshua W |
author_facet | Pantchenko, Oxana S Seidman, Seth J Guag, Joshua W |
author_sort | Pantchenko, Oxana S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, the number of neurostimulator systems implanted in patients has been rapidly growing. Nearly 50, 000 neurostimulators are implanted worldwide annually. The most common type of implantable neurostimulators is indicated for pain relief. At the same time, commercial use of other electromagnetic technologies is expanding, making electromagnetic interference (EMI) of neurostimulator function an issue of concern. Typically reported sources of neurostimulator EMI include security systems, metal detectors and wireless equipment. When near such sources, patients with implanted neurostimulators have reported adverse events such as shock, pain, and increased stimulation. In recent in vitro studies, radio frequency identification (RFID) technology has been shown to inhibit the stimulation pulse of an implantable neurostimulator system during low frequency exposure at close distances. This could potentially be due to induced electrical currents inside the implantable neurostimulator leads that are caused by magnetic field coupling from the low frequency identification system. METHODS: To systematically address the concerns posed by EMI, we developed a test platform to assess the interference from coupled magnetic fields on implantable neurostimulator systems. To measure interference, we recorded the output of one implantable neurostimulator, programmed for best therapy threshold settings, when in close proximity to an operating low frequency RFID emitter. The output contained electrical potentials from the neurostimulator system and those induced by EMI from the RFID emitter. We also recorded the output of the same neurostimulator system programmed for best therapy threshold settings without RFID interference. Using the Spatially Extended Nonlinear Node (SENN) model, we compared threshold factors of spinal cord fiber excitation for both recorded outputs. RESULTS: The electric current induced by low frequency RFID emitter was not significant to have a noticeable effect on electrical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a method for analyzing effects of coupled magnetic field interference on implantable neurostimulator system and its electrodes which could be used by device manufacturers during the design and testing phases of the development process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3213036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32130362011-11-14 Analysis of induced electrical currents from magnetic field coupling inside implantable neurostimulator leads Pantchenko, Oxana S Seidman, Seth J Guag, Joshua W Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, the number of neurostimulator systems implanted in patients has been rapidly growing. Nearly 50, 000 neurostimulators are implanted worldwide annually. The most common type of implantable neurostimulators is indicated for pain relief. At the same time, commercial use of other electromagnetic technologies is expanding, making electromagnetic interference (EMI) of neurostimulator function an issue of concern. Typically reported sources of neurostimulator EMI include security systems, metal detectors and wireless equipment. When near such sources, patients with implanted neurostimulators have reported adverse events such as shock, pain, and increased stimulation. In recent in vitro studies, radio frequency identification (RFID) technology has been shown to inhibit the stimulation pulse of an implantable neurostimulator system during low frequency exposure at close distances. This could potentially be due to induced electrical currents inside the implantable neurostimulator leads that are caused by magnetic field coupling from the low frequency identification system. METHODS: To systematically address the concerns posed by EMI, we developed a test platform to assess the interference from coupled magnetic fields on implantable neurostimulator systems. To measure interference, we recorded the output of one implantable neurostimulator, programmed for best therapy threshold settings, when in close proximity to an operating low frequency RFID emitter. The output contained electrical potentials from the neurostimulator system and those induced by EMI from the RFID emitter. We also recorded the output of the same neurostimulator system programmed for best therapy threshold settings without RFID interference. Using the Spatially Extended Nonlinear Node (SENN) model, we compared threshold factors of spinal cord fiber excitation for both recorded outputs. RESULTS: The electric current induced by low frequency RFID emitter was not significant to have a noticeable effect on electrical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a method for analyzing effects of coupled magnetic field interference on implantable neurostimulator system and its electrodes which could be used by device manufacturers during the design and testing phases of the development process. BioMed Central 2011-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3213036/ /pubmed/22014169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-10-94 Text en Copyright ©2011 Pantchenko et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Pantchenko, Oxana S Seidman, Seth J Guag, Joshua W Analysis of induced electrical currents from magnetic field coupling inside implantable neurostimulator leads |
title | Analysis of induced electrical currents from magnetic field coupling inside implantable neurostimulator leads |
title_full | Analysis of induced electrical currents from magnetic field coupling inside implantable neurostimulator leads |
title_fullStr | Analysis of induced electrical currents from magnetic field coupling inside implantable neurostimulator leads |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of induced electrical currents from magnetic field coupling inside implantable neurostimulator leads |
title_short | Analysis of induced electrical currents from magnetic field coupling inside implantable neurostimulator leads |
title_sort | analysis of induced electrical currents from magnetic field coupling inside implantable neurostimulator leads |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3213036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22014169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-10-94 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pantchenkooxanas analysisofinducedelectricalcurrentsfrommagneticfieldcouplinginsideimplantableneurostimulatorleads AT seidmansethj analysisofinducedelectricalcurrentsfrommagneticfieldcouplinginsideimplantableneurostimulatorleads AT guagjoshuaw analysisofinducedelectricalcurrentsfrommagneticfieldcouplinginsideimplantableneurostimulatorleads |