Cargando…
Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens
BACKGROUND: Bleach-sedimentation may improve microscopy for diagnosing tuberculosis by sterilising sputum and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We studied gravity bleach-sedimentation effects on safety, sensitivity, speed and reliability of smear-microscopy. METHODS: This blinded, controlled...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3213181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21985457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-269 |
_version_ | 1782216097010810880 |
---|---|
author | Chew, Rusheng Calderón, Carmen Schumacher, Samuel G Sherman, Jonathan M Caviedes, Luz Fuentes, Patricia Coronel, Jorge Valencia, Teresa Hererra, Beatriz Zimic, Mirko Huaroto, Lucy Sabogal, Ivan Escombe, A Rod Gilman, Robert H Evans, Carlton A |
author_facet | Chew, Rusheng Calderón, Carmen Schumacher, Samuel G Sherman, Jonathan M Caviedes, Luz Fuentes, Patricia Coronel, Jorge Valencia, Teresa Hererra, Beatriz Zimic, Mirko Huaroto, Lucy Sabogal, Ivan Escombe, A Rod Gilman, Robert H Evans, Carlton A |
author_sort | Chew, Rusheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bleach-sedimentation may improve microscopy for diagnosing tuberculosis by sterilising sputum and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We studied gravity bleach-sedimentation effects on safety, sensitivity, speed and reliability of smear-microscopy. METHODS: This blinded, controlled study used sputum specimens (n = 72) from tuberculosis patients. Bleach concentrations and exposure times required to sterilise sputum (n = 31) were determined. In the light of these results, the performance of 5 gravity bleach-sedimentation techniques that sterilise sputum specimens (n = 16) were compared. The best-performing of these bleach-sedimentation techniques involved adding 1 volume of 5% bleach to 1 volume of sputum, shaking for 10-minutes, diluting in 8 volumes distilled water and sedimenting overnight before microscopy. This technique was further evaluated by comparing numbers of visible acid-fast bacilli, slide-reading speed and reliability for triplicate smears before versus after bleach-sedimentation of sputum specimens (n = 25). Triplicate smears were made to increase precision and were stained using the Ziehl-Neelsen method. RESULTS: M. tuberculosis in sputum was successfully sterilised by adding equal volumes of 15% bleach for 1-minute, 6% for 5-minutes or 3% for 20-minutes. Bleach-sedimentation significantly decreased the number of acid-fast bacilli visualised compared with conventional smears (geometric mean of acid-fast bacilli per 100 microscopy fields 166, 95%CI 68-406, versus 346, 95%CI 139-862, respectively; p = 0.02). Bleach-sedimentation diluted paucibacillary specimens less than specimens with higher concentrations of visible acid-fast bacilli (p = 0.02). Smears made from bleach-sedimented sputum were read more rapidly than conventional smears (9.6 versus 11.2 minutes, respectively, p = 0.03). Counting conventional acid-fast bacilli had high reliability (inter-observer agreement, r = 0.991) that was significantly reduced (p = 0.03) by bleach-sedimentation (to r = 0.707) because occasional strongly positive bleach-sedimented smears were misread as negative. CONCLUSIONS: Gravity bleach-sedimentation improved laboratory safety by sterilising sputum but decreased the concentration of acid-fast bacilli visible on microscopy, especially for sputum specimens containing high concentrations of M. tuberculosis. Bleach-sedimentation allowed examination of more of each specimen in the time available but decreased the inter-observer reliability with which slides were read. Thus bleach-sedimentation effects vary depending upon specimen characteristics and whether microscopy was done for a specified time, or until a specified number of microscopy fields had been read. These findings provide an explanation for the contradictory results of previous studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3213181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32131812011-11-11 Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens Chew, Rusheng Calderón, Carmen Schumacher, Samuel G Sherman, Jonathan M Caviedes, Luz Fuentes, Patricia Coronel, Jorge Valencia, Teresa Hererra, Beatriz Zimic, Mirko Huaroto, Lucy Sabogal, Ivan Escombe, A Rod Gilman, Robert H Evans, Carlton A BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Bleach-sedimentation may improve microscopy for diagnosing tuberculosis by sterilising sputum and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We studied gravity bleach-sedimentation effects on safety, sensitivity, speed and reliability of smear-microscopy. METHODS: This blinded, controlled study used sputum specimens (n = 72) from tuberculosis patients. Bleach concentrations and exposure times required to sterilise sputum (n = 31) were determined. In the light of these results, the performance of 5 gravity bleach-sedimentation techniques that sterilise sputum specimens (n = 16) were compared. The best-performing of these bleach-sedimentation techniques involved adding 1 volume of 5% bleach to 1 volume of sputum, shaking for 10-minutes, diluting in 8 volumes distilled water and sedimenting overnight before microscopy. This technique was further evaluated by comparing numbers of visible acid-fast bacilli, slide-reading speed and reliability for triplicate smears before versus after bleach-sedimentation of sputum specimens (n = 25). Triplicate smears were made to increase precision and were stained using the Ziehl-Neelsen method. RESULTS: M. tuberculosis in sputum was successfully sterilised by adding equal volumes of 15% bleach for 1-minute, 6% for 5-minutes or 3% for 20-minutes. Bleach-sedimentation significantly decreased the number of acid-fast bacilli visualised compared with conventional smears (geometric mean of acid-fast bacilli per 100 microscopy fields 166, 95%CI 68-406, versus 346, 95%CI 139-862, respectively; p = 0.02). Bleach-sedimentation diluted paucibacillary specimens less than specimens with higher concentrations of visible acid-fast bacilli (p = 0.02). Smears made from bleach-sedimented sputum were read more rapidly than conventional smears (9.6 versus 11.2 minutes, respectively, p = 0.03). Counting conventional acid-fast bacilli had high reliability (inter-observer agreement, r = 0.991) that was significantly reduced (p = 0.03) by bleach-sedimentation (to r = 0.707) because occasional strongly positive bleach-sedimented smears were misread as negative. CONCLUSIONS: Gravity bleach-sedimentation improved laboratory safety by sterilising sputum but decreased the concentration of acid-fast bacilli visible on microscopy, especially for sputum specimens containing high concentrations of M. tuberculosis. Bleach-sedimentation allowed examination of more of each specimen in the time available but decreased the inter-observer reliability with which slides were read. Thus bleach-sedimentation effects vary depending upon specimen characteristics and whether microscopy was done for a specified time, or until a specified number of microscopy fields had been read. These findings provide an explanation for the contradictory results of previous studies. BioMed Central 2011-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3213181/ /pubmed/21985457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-269 Text en Copyright ©2011 Chew et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chew, Rusheng Calderón, Carmen Schumacher, Samuel G Sherman, Jonathan M Caviedes, Luz Fuentes, Patricia Coronel, Jorge Valencia, Teresa Hererra, Beatriz Zimic, Mirko Huaroto, Lucy Sabogal, Ivan Escombe, A Rod Gilman, Robert H Evans, Carlton A Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens |
title | Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens |
title_full | Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens |
title_short | Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens |
title_sort | evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3213181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21985457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-269 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chewrusheng evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT calderoncarmen evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT schumachersamuelg evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT shermanjonathanm evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT caviedesluz evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT fuentespatricia evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT coroneljorge evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT valenciateresa evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT hererrabeatriz evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT zimicmirko evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT huarotolucy evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT sabogalivan evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT escombearod evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT gilmanroberth evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens AT evanscarltona evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens |