Cargando…

Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens

BACKGROUND: Bleach-sedimentation may improve microscopy for diagnosing tuberculosis by sterilising sputum and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We studied gravity bleach-sedimentation effects on safety, sensitivity, speed and reliability of smear-microscopy. METHODS: This blinded, controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chew, Rusheng, Calderón, Carmen, Schumacher, Samuel G, Sherman, Jonathan M, Caviedes, Luz, Fuentes, Patricia, Coronel, Jorge, Valencia, Teresa, Hererra, Beatriz, Zimic, Mirko, Huaroto, Lucy, Sabogal, Ivan, Escombe, A Rod, Gilman, Robert H, Evans, Carlton A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3213181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21985457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-269
_version_ 1782216097010810880
author Chew, Rusheng
Calderón, Carmen
Schumacher, Samuel G
Sherman, Jonathan M
Caviedes, Luz
Fuentes, Patricia
Coronel, Jorge
Valencia, Teresa
Hererra, Beatriz
Zimic, Mirko
Huaroto, Lucy
Sabogal, Ivan
Escombe, A Rod
Gilman, Robert H
Evans, Carlton A
author_facet Chew, Rusheng
Calderón, Carmen
Schumacher, Samuel G
Sherman, Jonathan M
Caviedes, Luz
Fuentes, Patricia
Coronel, Jorge
Valencia, Teresa
Hererra, Beatriz
Zimic, Mirko
Huaroto, Lucy
Sabogal, Ivan
Escombe, A Rod
Gilman, Robert H
Evans, Carlton A
author_sort Chew, Rusheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bleach-sedimentation may improve microscopy for diagnosing tuberculosis by sterilising sputum and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We studied gravity bleach-sedimentation effects on safety, sensitivity, speed and reliability of smear-microscopy. METHODS: This blinded, controlled study used sputum specimens (n = 72) from tuberculosis patients. Bleach concentrations and exposure times required to sterilise sputum (n = 31) were determined. In the light of these results, the performance of 5 gravity bleach-sedimentation techniques that sterilise sputum specimens (n = 16) were compared. The best-performing of these bleach-sedimentation techniques involved adding 1 volume of 5% bleach to 1 volume of sputum, shaking for 10-minutes, diluting in 8 volumes distilled water and sedimenting overnight before microscopy. This technique was further evaluated by comparing numbers of visible acid-fast bacilli, slide-reading speed and reliability for triplicate smears before versus after bleach-sedimentation of sputum specimens (n = 25). Triplicate smears were made to increase precision and were stained using the Ziehl-Neelsen method. RESULTS: M. tuberculosis in sputum was successfully sterilised by adding equal volumes of 15% bleach for 1-minute, 6% for 5-minutes or 3% for 20-minutes. Bleach-sedimentation significantly decreased the number of acid-fast bacilli visualised compared with conventional smears (geometric mean of acid-fast bacilli per 100 microscopy fields 166, 95%CI 68-406, versus 346, 95%CI 139-862, respectively; p = 0.02). Bleach-sedimentation diluted paucibacillary specimens less than specimens with higher concentrations of visible acid-fast bacilli (p = 0.02). Smears made from bleach-sedimented sputum were read more rapidly than conventional smears (9.6 versus 11.2 minutes, respectively, p = 0.03). Counting conventional acid-fast bacilli had high reliability (inter-observer agreement, r = 0.991) that was significantly reduced (p = 0.03) by bleach-sedimentation (to r = 0.707) because occasional strongly positive bleach-sedimented smears were misread as negative. CONCLUSIONS: Gravity bleach-sedimentation improved laboratory safety by sterilising sputum but decreased the concentration of acid-fast bacilli visible on microscopy, especially for sputum specimens containing high concentrations of M. tuberculosis. Bleach-sedimentation allowed examination of more of each specimen in the time available but decreased the inter-observer reliability with which slides were read. Thus bleach-sedimentation effects vary depending upon specimen characteristics and whether microscopy was done for a specified time, or until a specified number of microscopy fields had been read. These findings provide an explanation for the contradictory results of previous studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3213181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32131812011-11-11 Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens Chew, Rusheng Calderón, Carmen Schumacher, Samuel G Sherman, Jonathan M Caviedes, Luz Fuentes, Patricia Coronel, Jorge Valencia, Teresa Hererra, Beatriz Zimic, Mirko Huaroto, Lucy Sabogal, Ivan Escombe, A Rod Gilman, Robert H Evans, Carlton A BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Bleach-sedimentation may improve microscopy for diagnosing tuberculosis by sterilising sputum and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We studied gravity bleach-sedimentation effects on safety, sensitivity, speed and reliability of smear-microscopy. METHODS: This blinded, controlled study used sputum specimens (n = 72) from tuberculosis patients. Bleach concentrations and exposure times required to sterilise sputum (n = 31) were determined. In the light of these results, the performance of 5 gravity bleach-sedimentation techniques that sterilise sputum specimens (n = 16) were compared. The best-performing of these bleach-sedimentation techniques involved adding 1 volume of 5% bleach to 1 volume of sputum, shaking for 10-minutes, diluting in 8 volumes distilled water and sedimenting overnight before microscopy. This technique was further evaluated by comparing numbers of visible acid-fast bacilli, slide-reading speed and reliability for triplicate smears before versus after bleach-sedimentation of sputum specimens (n = 25). Triplicate smears were made to increase precision and were stained using the Ziehl-Neelsen method. RESULTS: M. tuberculosis in sputum was successfully sterilised by adding equal volumes of 15% bleach for 1-minute, 6% for 5-minutes or 3% for 20-minutes. Bleach-sedimentation significantly decreased the number of acid-fast bacilli visualised compared with conventional smears (geometric mean of acid-fast bacilli per 100 microscopy fields 166, 95%CI 68-406, versus 346, 95%CI 139-862, respectively; p = 0.02). Bleach-sedimentation diluted paucibacillary specimens less than specimens with higher concentrations of visible acid-fast bacilli (p = 0.02). Smears made from bleach-sedimented sputum were read more rapidly than conventional smears (9.6 versus 11.2 minutes, respectively, p = 0.03). Counting conventional acid-fast bacilli had high reliability (inter-observer agreement, r = 0.991) that was significantly reduced (p = 0.03) by bleach-sedimentation (to r = 0.707) because occasional strongly positive bleach-sedimented smears were misread as negative. CONCLUSIONS: Gravity bleach-sedimentation improved laboratory safety by sterilising sputum but decreased the concentration of acid-fast bacilli visible on microscopy, especially for sputum specimens containing high concentrations of M. tuberculosis. Bleach-sedimentation allowed examination of more of each specimen in the time available but decreased the inter-observer reliability with which slides were read. Thus bleach-sedimentation effects vary depending upon specimen characteristics and whether microscopy was done for a specified time, or until a specified number of microscopy fields had been read. These findings provide an explanation for the contradictory results of previous studies. BioMed Central 2011-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3213181/ /pubmed/21985457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-269 Text en Copyright ©2011 Chew et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chew, Rusheng
Calderón, Carmen
Schumacher, Samuel G
Sherman, Jonathan M
Caviedes, Luz
Fuentes, Patricia
Coronel, Jorge
Valencia, Teresa
Hererra, Beatriz
Zimic, Mirko
Huaroto, Lucy
Sabogal, Ivan
Escombe, A Rod
Gilman, Robert H
Evans, Carlton A
Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens
title Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens
title_full Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens
title_fullStr Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens
title_short Evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens
title_sort evaluation of bleach-sedimentation for sterilising and concentrating mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3213181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21985457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-269
work_keys_str_mv AT chewrusheng evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT calderoncarmen evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT schumachersamuelg evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT shermanjonathanm evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT caviedesluz evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT fuentespatricia evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT coroneljorge evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT valenciateresa evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT hererrabeatriz evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT zimicmirko evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT huarotolucy evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT sabogalivan evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT escombearod evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT gilmanroberth evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens
AT evanscarltona evaluationofbleachsedimentationforsterilisingandconcentratingmycobacteriumtuberculosisinsputumspecimens