Cargando…
Bilateral kidney preservation by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) compared to conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies
BACKGROUND: To compare volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans with conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) plans in pancreatic and bile duct cancers, especially for bilateral kidney preservation. METHODS: A dosimetric analysis was performed in 21 patients who had undergone radiotherapy for pancreati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3213214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22040762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-147 |
_version_ | 1782216103400833024 |
---|---|
author | Vieillot, Sabine Azria, David Riou, Olivier Moscardo, Carmen Llacer Dubois, Jean-Bernard Aillères, Norbert Fenoglietto, Pascal |
author_facet | Vieillot, Sabine Azria, David Riou, Olivier Moscardo, Carmen Llacer Dubois, Jean-Bernard Aillères, Norbert Fenoglietto, Pascal |
author_sort | Vieillot, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans with conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) plans in pancreatic and bile duct cancers, especially for bilateral kidney preservation. METHODS: A dosimetric analysis was performed in 21 patients who had undergone radiotherapy for pancreatic or bile duct carcinoma at our institution. We compared 4-field 3D-CRT and 2 arcs RapidArc (RA) plans. The treatment plan was designed to deliver a dose of 50.4 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) based on the gross disease in a 1.8 Gy daily fraction, 5 days a week. Planning objectives were 95% of the PTV receiving 95% of the prescribed dose and no more than 2% of the PTV receiving more than 107%. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) for the target volume and the organs at risk (right and left kidneys, bowel tract, liver and healthy tissue) were compared. Monitor units and delivery treatment time were also reported. RESULTS: All plans achieved objectives, with 95% of the PTV receiving ≥ 95% of the dose (D95% for 3D-CRT = 48.9 Gy and for RA = 48.6 Gy). RapidArc was shown to be superior to 3D-CRT in terms of organ at risk sparing except for contralateral kidney: for bowel tract, the mean dose was reduced by RA compared to 3D-CRT (16.7 vs 20.8 Gy, p = 0.0001). Similar result was observed for homolateral kidney (mean dose of 4.7 Gy for RA vs 12.6 Gy for 3D-CRT, p < 0.0001), but 3D-CRT significantly reduced controlateral kidney dose with a mean dose of 1.8 Gy vs 3.9 Gy, p < 0.0007. Compared to 3D-CRT, mean MUs for each fraction was significantly increased with RapidArc: 207 vs 589, (p < 0.0001) but the treatment time was not significantly different (2 and 2.66 minutes, p = ns). CONCLUSION: RapidArc allows significant dose reduction, in particular for homolateral kidney and bowel, while maintaining target coverage. This would have a promising impact on reducing toxicities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3213214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32132142011-11-11 Bilateral kidney preservation by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) compared to conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies Vieillot, Sabine Azria, David Riou, Olivier Moscardo, Carmen Llacer Dubois, Jean-Bernard Aillères, Norbert Fenoglietto, Pascal Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To compare volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans with conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) plans in pancreatic and bile duct cancers, especially for bilateral kidney preservation. METHODS: A dosimetric analysis was performed in 21 patients who had undergone radiotherapy for pancreatic or bile duct carcinoma at our institution. We compared 4-field 3D-CRT and 2 arcs RapidArc (RA) plans. The treatment plan was designed to deliver a dose of 50.4 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) based on the gross disease in a 1.8 Gy daily fraction, 5 days a week. Planning objectives were 95% of the PTV receiving 95% of the prescribed dose and no more than 2% of the PTV receiving more than 107%. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) for the target volume and the organs at risk (right and left kidneys, bowel tract, liver and healthy tissue) were compared. Monitor units and delivery treatment time were also reported. RESULTS: All plans achieved objectives, with 95% of the PTV receiving ≥ 95% of the dose (D95% for 3D-CRT = 48.9 Gy and for RA = 48.6 Gy). RapidArc was shown to be superior to 3D-CRT in terms of organ at risk sparing except for contralateral kidney: for bowel tract, the mean dose was reduced by RA compared to 3D-CRT (16.7 vs 20.8 Gy, p = 0.0001). Similar result was observed for homolateral kidney (mean dose of 4.7 Gy for RA vs 12.6 Gy for 3D-CRT, p < 0.0001), but 3D-CRT significantly reduced controlateral kidney dose with a mean dose of 1.8 Gy vs 3.9 Gy, p < 0.0007. Compared to 3D-CRT, mean MUs for each fraction was significantly increased with RapidArc: 207 vs 589, (p < 0.0001) but the treatment time was not significantly different (2 and 2.66 minutes, p = ns). CONCLUSION: RapidArc allows significant dose reduction, in particular for homolateral kidney and bowel, while maintaining target coverage. This would have a promising impact on reducing toxicities. BioMed Central 2011-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3213214/ /pubmed/22040762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-147 Text en Copyright ©2011 Vieillot et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Vieillot, Sabine Azria, David Riou, Olivier Moscardo, Carmen Llacer Dubois, Jean-Bernard Aillères, Norbert Fenoglietto, Pascal Bilateral kidney preservation by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) compared to conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies |
title | Bilateral kidney preservation by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) compared to conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies |
title_full | Bilateral kidney preservation by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) compared to conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies |
title_fullStr | Bilateral kidney preservation by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) compared to conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies |
title_full_unstemmed | Bilateral kidney preservation by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) compared to conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies |
title_short | Bilateral kidney preservation by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) compared to conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies |
title_sort | bilateral kidney preservation by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (rapidarc) compared to conventional radiation therapy (3d-crt) in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3213214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22040762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vieillotsabine bilateralkidneypreservationbyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyrapidarccomparedtoconventionalradiationtherapy3dcrtinpancreaticandbileductmalignancies AT azriadavid bilateralkidneypreservationbyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyrapidarccomparedtoconventionalradiationtherapy3dcrtinpancreaticandbileductmalignancies AT riouolivier bilateralkidneypreservationbyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyrapidarccomparedtoconventionalradiationtherapy3dcrtinpancreaticandbileductmalignancies AT moscardocarmenllacer bilateralkidneypreservationbyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyrapidarccomparedtoconventionalradiationtherapy3dcrtinpancreaticandbileductmalignancies AT duboisjeanbernard bilateralkidneypreservationbyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyrapidarccomparedtoconventionalradiationtherapy3dcrtinpancreaticandbileductmalignancies AT ailleresnorbert bilateralkidneypreservationbyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyrapidarccomparedtoconventionalradiationtherapy3dcrtinpancreaticandbileductmalignancies AT fenogliettopascal bilateralkidneypreservationbyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyrapidarccomparedtoconventionalradiationtherapy3dcrtinpancreaticandbileductmalignancies |