Cargando…

Effectiveness evaluation of an integrated automatic termomechanic massage system (SMATH(® )system) in non-specific sub-acute and chronic low back pain - a randomized double-blinded controlled trial, comparing SMATH therapy versus sham therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem in modern society, with 70-85% of the population experiencing LBP at some time in their lives. Each year, 5-10% of the workforce misses work due to LBP, most for less than 7 days. Almost 10% of all patients are at risk of developing chronic p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buselli, Paolo, Bosoni, Roberto, Busè, Gabriella, Fasoli, Paola, La Scala, Elide, Mazzolari, Rita, Zanetti, Federica, Messina, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21967800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-216
_version_ 1782216214570860544
author Buselli, Paolo
Bosoni, Roberto
Busè, Gabriella
Fasoli, Paola
La Scala, Elide
Mazzolari, Rita
Zanetti, Federica
Messina, Sara
author_facet Buselli, Paolo
Bosoni, Roberto
Busè, Gabriella
Fasoli, Paola
La Scala, Elide
Mazzolari, Rita
Zanetti, Federica
Messina, Sara
author_sort Buselli, Paolo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem in modern society, with 70-85% of the population experiencing LBP at some time in their lives. Each year, 5-10% of the workforce misses work due to LBP, most for less than 7 days. Almost 10% of all patients are at risk of developing chronic pain and disability. Little clinical evidence is available for the majority of treatments used in LBP therapy. However, moderate evidence exists for interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise, acupuncture, spinal manipulation, and cognitive behavioral therapy for subacute and chronic LBP. The SMATH(® )system (system for automatic thermomechanic massage in health) is a new medical device (MD) that combines basic principles of mechanical massage, thermotherapy, acupressure, infrared therapy, and moxibustion. SMATH(® )is suitable for automatic multidisciplinary treatment on patients with non-specific sub-acute and chronic LBP. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper describes the protocol for a double-blinded, sham-controlled, randomized, single-center short term clinical trial in patients with non-specific sub-acute and chronic LBP aged 18 to 70 years. The primary outcome will be the effectiveness of SMATH(® )versus sham therapy (medical device without active principles) determined by evaluating self perceived physical function with Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores after 4 weeks of treatment (end of treatment). Major secondary outcome will be effectiveness of SMATH(® )determined by evaluating self perceived physical function comparing RMDQ scores between end of treatment and baseline. The trial part of the study will take 7 months while observational follow-up will take 11 months. The sample size will be 72 participants (36 for each arm). The project has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Cremona Hospital, Italy on 29 November 2010. DISCUSSION: Compared to other medical specialties, physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) has not yet received the deserved recognition from clinicians and researchers in the scientific community, especially for medical devices. The best way to change this disadvantage is through well-conducted clinical research in sham-controlled randomized trials. Sham treatment groups are essential for improving the level of evidence-based practice in PRM. The present trial will counter the general lack of evidence concerning medical devices used in LBP therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN08714168
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3214170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32141702011-11-12 Effectiveness evaluation of an integrated automatic termomechanic massage system (SMATH(® )system) in non-specific sub-acute and chronic low back pain - a randomized double-blinded controlled trial, comparing SMATH therapy versus sham therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Buselli, Paolo Bosoni, Roberto Busè, Gabriella Fasoli, Paola La Scala, Elide Mazzolari, Rita Zanetti, Federica Messina, Sara Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem in modern society, with 70-85% of the population experiencing LBP at some time in their lives. Each year, 5-10% of the workforce misses work due to LBP, most for less than 7 days. Almost 10% of all patients are at risk of developing chronic pain and disability. Little clinical evidence is available for the majority of treatments used in LBP therapy. However, moderate evidence exists for interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise, acupuncture, spinal manipulation, and cognitive behavioral therapy for subacute and chronic LBP. The SMATH(® )system (system for automatic thermomechanic massage in health) is a new medical device (MD) that combines basic principles of mechanical massage, thermotherapy, acupressure, infrared therapy, and moxibustion. SMATH(® )is suitable for automatic multidisciplinary treatment on patients with non-specific sub-acute and chronic LBP. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper describes the protocol for a double-blinded, sham-controlled, randomized, single-center short term clinical trial in patients with non-specific sub-acute and chronic LBP aged 18 to 70 years. The primary outcome will be the effectiveness of SMATH(® )versus sham therapy (medical device without active principles) determined by evaluating self perceived physical function with Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores after 4 weeks of treatment (end of treatment). Major secondary outcome will be effectiveness of SMATH(® )determined by evaluating self perceived physical function comparing RMDQ scores between end of treatment and baseline. The trial part of the study will take 7 months while observational follow-up will take 11 months. The sample size will be 72 participants (36 for each arm). The project has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Cremona Hospital, Italy on 29 November 2010. DISCUSSION: Compared to other medical specialties, physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) has not yet received the deserved recognition from clinicians and researchers in the scientific community, especially for medical devices. The best way to change this disadvantage is through well-conducted clinical research in sham-controlled randomized trials. Sham treatment groups are essential for improving the level of evidence-based practice in PRM. The present trial will counter the general lack of evidence concerning medical devices used in LBP therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN08714168 BioMed Central 2011-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3214170/ /pubmed/21967800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-216 Text en Copyright ©2011 Buselli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Buselli, Paolo
Bosoni, Roberto
Busè, Gabriella
Fasoli, Paola
La Scala, Elide
Mazzolari, Rita
Zanetti, Federica
Messina, Sara
Effectiveness evaluation of an integrated automatic termomechanic massage system (SMATH(® )system) in non-specific sub-acute and chronic low back pain - a randomized double-blinded controlled trial, comparing SMATH therapy versus sham therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Effectiveness evaluation of an integrated automatic termomechanic massage system (SMATH(® )system) in non-specific sub-acute and chronic low back pain - a randomized double-blinded controlled trial, comparing SMATH therapy versus sham therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness evaluation of an integrated automatic termomechanic massage system (SMATH(® )system) in non-specific sub-acute and chronic low back pain - a randomized double-blinded controlled trial, comparing SMATH therapy versus sham therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness evaluation of an integrated automatic termomechanic massage system (SMATH(® )system) in non-specific sub-acute and chronic low back pain - a randomized double-blinded controlled trial, comparing SMATH therapy versus sham therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness evaluation of an integrated automatic termomechanic massage system (SMATH(® )system) in non-specific sub-acute and chronic low back pain - a randomized double-blinded controlled trial, comparing SMATH therapy versus sham therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness evaluation of an integrated automatic termomechanic massage system (SMATH(® )system) in non-specific sub-acute and chronic low back pain - a randomized double-blinded controlled trial, comparing SMATH therapy versus sham therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness evaluation of an integrated automatic termomechanic massage system (smath(® )system) in non-specific sub-acute and chronic low back pain - a randomized double-blinded controlled trial, comparing smath therapy versus sham therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21967800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-216
work_keys_str_mv AT busellipaolo effectivenessevaluationofanintegratedautomatictermomechanicmassagesystemsmathsysteminnonspecificsubacuteandchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledtrialcomparingsmaththerapyversusshamtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bosoniroberto effectivenessevaluationofanintegratedautomatictermomechanicmassagesystemsmathsysteminnonspecificsubacuteandchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledtrialcomparingsmaththerapyversusshamtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT busegabriella effectivenessevaluationofanintegratedautomatictermomechanicmassagesystemsmathsysteminnonspecificsubacuteandchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledtrialcomparingsmaththerapyversusshamtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fasolipaola effectivenessevaluationofanintegratedautomatictermomechanicmassagesystemsmathsysteminnonspecificsubacuteandchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledtrialcomparingsmaththerapyversusshamtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lascalaelide effectivenessevaluationofanintegratedautomatictermomechanicmassagesystemsmathsysteminnonspecificsubacuteandchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledtrialcomparingsmaththerapyversusshamtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mazzolaririta effectivenessevaluationofanintegratedautomatictermomechanicmassagesystemsmathsysteminnonspecificsubacuteandchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledtrialcomparingsmaththerapyversusshamtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zanettifederica effectivenessevaluationofanintegratedautomatictermomechanicmassagesystemsmathsysteminnonspecificsubacuteandchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledtrialcomparingsmaththerapyversusshamtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT messinasara effectivenessevaluationofanintegratedautomatictermomechanicmassagesystemsmathsysteminnonspecificsubacuteandchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledtrialcomparingsmaththerapyversusshamtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial