Cargando…

Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Either general or regional anesthesia can be used for lumbar disk surgery. The common anesthetic technique is general anesthesia (GA). The aim of this study was to compare the intra and postoperative outcomes of spinal anesthesia (SA) with GA in these patients. METHODS: Seventy-two patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attari, Mohammad Ali, Mirhosseini, Sayyed Ahmad, Honarmand, Azim, Safavi, Mohammad Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22091269
_version_ 1782216245267922944
author Attari, Mohammad Ali
Mirhosseini, Sayyed Ahmad
Honarmand, Azim
Safavi, Mohammad Reza
author_facet Attari, Mohammad Ali
Mirhosseini, Sayyed Ahmad
Honarmand, Azim
Safavi, Mohammad Reza
author_sort Attari, Mohammad Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Either general or regional anesthesia can be used for lumbar disk surgery. The common anesthetic technique is general anesthesia (GA). The aim of this study was to compare the intra and postoperative outcomes of spinal anesthesia (SA) with GA in these patients. METHODS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into two groups with 37 patients in GA Group and 35 ones in SA Group. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood loss, surgeons satisfaction with the operating conditions, the severity of postoperative pain based on visual analogue scale (VAS) and analgesic use were recorded. RESULTS: The mean blood loss was significantly less in the SA Group compared to GA Group (p < 0.05). Intraoperative maximum blood pressure and heart rate changes were significantly less in SA Group (p < 0.05). The surgeons satisfaction was significantly more in the SA Group (p < 0.05). The number of patients who used postoperative analgesic as well as postoperative mean VAS was significantly less in SA Group in comparison with GA group (p < 0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that SA was superior to GA in providing postoperative analgesia and decreasing blood loss while maintained better perioperative hemodynamic stability without increasing adverse side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3214358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32143582011-11-16 Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial Attari, Mohammad Ali Mirhosseini, Sayyed Ahmad Honarmand, Azim Safavi, Mohammad Reza J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Either general or regional anesthesia can be used for lumbar disk surgery. The common anesthetic technique is general anesthesia (GA). The aim of this study was to compare the intra and postoperative outcomes of spinal anesthesia (SA) with GA in these patients. METHODS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into two groups with 37 patients in GA Group and 35 ones in SA Group. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood loss, surgeons satisfaction with the operating conditions, the severity of postoperative pain based on visual analogue scale (VAS) and analgesic use were recorded. RESULTS: The mean blood loss was significantly less in the SA Group compared to GA Group (p < 0.05). Intraoperative maximum blood pressure and heart rate changes were significantly less in SA Group (p < 0.05). The surgeons satisfaction was significantly more in the SA Group (p < 0.05). The number of patients who used postoperative analgesic as well as postoperative mean VAS was significantly less in SA Group in comparison with GA group (p < 0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that SA was superior to GA in providing postoperative analgesia and decreasing blood loss while maintained better perioperative hemodynamic stability without increasing adverse side effects. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3214358/ /pubmed/22091269 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Attari, Mohammad Ali
Mirhosseini, Sayyed Ahmad
Honarmand, Azim
Safavi, Mohammad Reza
Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial
title Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22091269
work_keys_str_mv AT attarimohammadali spinalanesthesiaversusgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinesurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mirhosseinisayyedahmad spinalanesthesiaversusgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinesurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT honarmandazim spinalanesthesiaversusgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinesurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT safavimohammadreza spinalanesthesiaversusgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinesurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrial