Cargando…

Comparing immune response of intradermal low dose versus intramuscular high dose of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B is the most important cause of cirrhosis in developing countries. Hemodialysis patients are susceptible to infection due to repeated contact with dialysis machines and blood products. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intradermal low dose with intramuscular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Momeni, Ali, Rajaei, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22091271
_version_ 1782216245732442112
author Momeni, Ali
Rajaei, Mohammad
author_facet Momeni, Ali
Rajaei, Mohammad
author_sort Momeni, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B is the most important cause of cirrhosis in developing countries. Hemodialysis patients are susceptible to infection due to repeated contact with dialysis machines and blood products. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intradermal low dose with intramuscular high dose hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study on 24 hemodialysis patients that not responded to conventional method of vaccination in this center (double dose in 0, 1 and 6 months) and have antibody titer less than 10 mu/ml were enrolled to intramuscular or intradermal group, randomly. In intradermal (ID) group 10 μg (0.5 ml) recombinant vaccine, every 2 weeks to 6 months and in intramuscular (IM) group 40 μg (2 ml) at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months were prescribed and antibody titer were checked after 1 and 3 months of the end of vaccination. RESULTS: Mean HBS antibody titer in patients was 4.4 ± 3.1 mu/ml at the beginning of study (minimum: 1.1 mu/ml and maximum: 9.2 mu/ml) and after 1 month and 3 months, mean HBS antibody were 190.4 ± 59 and 223.3 ± 83.9, respectively (p < 0.001). After one month, in intradermal and intramuscular groups, mean HBS antibody was 198.8 ± 75.6 mu/ml and 181.2 ± 61.8 mu/ml, respectively (p = 0.5) and after 3 months it was 230 ± 76 mu/ml and 216.2 ± 94.3 mu/ml, respectively (p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Antibody titer was high (> 50 mu/ml) in two groups after 1 and 3 months of vaccination and no significant difference was found between the 2 groups. Therefore, two methods of vaccination (high dose IM and low dose SC) are equally effective and the selection of vaccination method is based on health policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3214360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32143602011-11-16 Comparing immune response of intradermal low dose versus intramuscular high dose of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients Momeni, Ali Rajaei, Mohammad J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B is the most important cause of cirrhosis in developing countries. Hemodialysis patients are susceptible to infection due to repeated contact with dialysis machines and blood products. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intradermal low dose with intramuscular high dose hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study on 24 hemodialysis patients that not responded to conventional method of vaccination in this center (double dose in 0, 1 and 6 months) and have antibody titer less than 10 mu/ml were enrolled to intramuscular or intradermal group, randomly. In intradermal (ID) group 10 μg (0.5 ml) recombinant vaccine, every 2 weeks to 6 months and in intramuscular (IM) group 40 μg (2 ml) at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months were prescribed and antibody titer were checked after 1 and 3 months of the end of vaccination. RESULTS: Mean HBS antibody titer in patients was 4.4 ± 3.1 mu/ml at the beginning of study (minimum: 1.1 mu/ml and maximum: 9.2 mu/ml) and after 1 month and 3 months, mean HBS antibody were 190.4 ± 59 and 223.3 ± 83.9, respectively (p < 0.001). After one month, in intradermal and intramuscular groups, mean HBS antibody was 198.8 ± 75.6 mu/ml and 181.2 ± 61.8 mu/ml, respectively (p = 0.5) and after 3 months it was 230 ± 76 mu/ml and 216.2 ± 94.3 mu/ml, respectively (p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Antibody titer was high (> 50 mu/ml) in two groups after 1 and 3 months of vaccination and no significant difference was found between the 2 groups. Therefore, two methods of vaccination (high dose IM and low dose SC) are equally effective and the selection of vaccination method is based on health policy. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3214360/ /pubmed/22091271 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Momeni, Ali
Rajaei, Mohammad
Comparing immune response of intradermal low dose versus intramuscular high dose of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients
title Comparing immune response of intradermal low dose versus intramuscular high dose of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients
title_full Comparing immune response of intradermal low dose versus intramuscular high dose of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients
title_fullStr Comparing immune response of intradermal low dose versus intramuscular high dose of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparing immune response of intradermal low dose versus intramuscular high dose of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients
title_short Comparing immune response of intradermal low dose versus intramuscular high dose of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients
title_sort comparing immune response of intradermal low dose versus intramuscular high dose of hepatitis b vaccination in hemodialysis patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22091271
work_keys_str_mv AT momeniali comparingimmuneresponseofintradermallowdoseversusintramuscularhighdoseofhepatitisbvaccinationinhemodialysispatients
AT rajaeimohammad comparingimmuneresponseofintradermallowdoseversusintramuscularhighdoseofhepatitisbvaccinationinhemodialysispatients