Cargando…

Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of tooth size discrepancy (TSD) in a representative orthodontics population, to explore how many millimeters of TSD is clinically significant and to determine the ability of simple visual inspection to detect such a discrepancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sampl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Rekha, Kumar, Sushil, Singla, Anu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22090759
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.86445
_version_ 1782216283607007232
author Sharma, Rekha
Kumar, Sushil
Singla, Anu
author_facet Sharma, Rekha
Kumar, Sushil
Singla, Anu
author_sort Sharma, Rekha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of tooth size discrepancy (TSD) in a representative orthodontics population, to explore how many millimeters of TSD is clinically significant and to determine the ability of simple visual inspection to detect such a discrepancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 150 pretreatment study casts with fully erupted and complete permanent dentitions from first molar to first molar, which were selected randomly from records of the orthodontic patients. The mesiodistal diameters of the teeth were measured at contact points using digital calipers and the Bolton's analysis was carried out on them. Simple visual estimation of Bolton discrepancy was also performed. RESULTS: In the sample group, 24% of the patients had anterior tooth width ratios and 8% had total arch ratios greater than ±2 standard deviation (SD) from Bolton's means. For the anterior analysis, correction greater than ±2 mm was required for 24% of patients in the upper arch or 14% in the lower arch. For the total arch analysis, correction greater than ±2 mm was required for 36% of patients in the upper arch or 32% in the lower arch. CONCLUSION: Bolton's analysis should be routinely performed in all orthodontic patients and the findings should be included in orthodontic treatment planning. 2 mm of the required tooth size correction is an appropriate threshold for clinical significance. Visual estimation of TSD has low sensitivity and specificity. Careful measurement is more frequently required in clinical practice than visual estimation would suggest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3214522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32145222011-11-16 Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients Sharma, Rekha Kumar, Sushil Singla, Anu Contemp Clin Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of tooth size discrepancy (TSD) in a representative orthodontics population, to explore how many millimeters of TSD is clinically significant and to determine the ability of simple visual inspection to detect such a discrepancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 150 pretreatment study casts with fully erupted and complete permanent dentitions from first molar to first molar, which were selected randomly from records of the orthodontic patients. The mesiodistal diameters of the teeth were measured at contact points using digital calipers and the Bolton's analysis was carried out on them. Simple visual estimation of Bolton discrepancy was also performed. RESULTS: In the sample group, 24% of the patients had anterior tooth width ratios and 8% had total arch ratios greater than ±2 standard deviation (SD) from Bolton's means. For the anterior analysis, correction greater than ±2 mm was required for 24% of patients in the upper arch or 14% in the lower arch. For the total arch analysis, correction greater than ±2 mm was required for 36% of patients in the upper arch or 32% in the lower arch. CONCLUSION: Bolton's analysis should be routinely performed in all orthodontic patients and the findings should be included in orthodontic treatment planning. 2 mm of the required tooth size correction is an appropriate threshold for clinical significance. Visual estimation of TSD has low sensitivity and specificity. Careful measurement is more frequently required in clinical practice than visual estimation would suggest. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3214522/ /pubmed/22090759 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.86445 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Rekha
Kumar, Sushil
Singla, Anu
Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients
title Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients
title_full Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients
title_fullStr Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients
title_short Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients
title_sort prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among north indian orthodontic patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22090759
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.86445
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmarekha prevalenceoftoothsizediscrepancyamongnorthindianorthodonticpatients
AT kumarsushil prevalenceoftoothsizediscrepancyamongnorthindianorthodonticpatients
AT singlaanu prevalenceoftoothsizediscrepancyamongnorthindianorthodonticpatients