Cargando…

Distinguishing Linear vs. Non-Linear Integration in CA1 Radial Oblique Dendrites: It’s about Time

It was recently shown that multiple excitatory inputs to CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites must be activated nearly simultaneously to generate local dendritic spikes and supralinear responses at the soma; even slight input desynchronization prevented local spike initiation (Gasparini and Magee, 2006; L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gómez González, José Francisco, Mel, Bartlett W., Poirazi, Panayiota
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22171217
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2011.00044
_version_ 1782216305654366208
author Gómez González, José Francisco
Mel, Bartlett W.
Poirazi, Panayiota
author_facet Gómez González, José Francisco
Mel, Bartlett W.
Poirazi, Panayiota
author_sort Gómez González, José Francisco
collection PubMed
description It was recently shown that multiple excitatory inputs to CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites must be activated nearly simultaneously to generate local dendritic spikes and supralinear responses at the soma; even slight input desynchronization prevented local spike initiation (Gasparini and Magee, 2006; Losonczy and Magee, 2006). This led to the conjecture that CA1 pyramidal neurons may only express their non-linear integrative capabilities during the highly synchronized sharp waves and ripples that occur during slow wave sleep and resting/consummatory behavior, whereas during active exploration and REM sleep (theta rhythm), inadequate synchronization of excitation would lead CA1 pyramidal cells to function as essentially linear devices. Using a detailed single neuron model, we replicated the experimentally observed synchronization effect for brief inputs mimicking single synaptic release events. When synapses were driven instead by double pulses, more representative of the bursty inputs that occur in vivo, we found that the tolerance for input desynchronization was increased by more than an order of magnitude. The effect depended mainly on paired-pulse facilitation of NMDA receptor-mediated responses at Schaffer collateral synapses. Our results suggest that CA1 pyramidal cells could function as non-linear integrative units in all major hippocampal states.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3214726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32147262011-12-14 Distinguishing Linear vs. Non-Linear Integration in CA1 Radial Oblique Dendrites: It’s about Time Gómez González, José Francisco Mel, Bartlett W. Poirazi, Panayiota Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience It was recently shown that multiple excitatory inputs to CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites must be activated nearly simultaneously to generate local dendritic spikes and supralinear responses at the soma; even slight input desynchronization prevented local spike initiation (Gasparini and Magee, 2006; Losonczy and Magee, 2006). This led to the conjecture that CA1 pyramidal neurons may only express their non-linear integrative capabilities during the highly synchronized sharp waves and ripples that occur during slow wave sleep and resting/consummatory behavior, whereas during active exploration and REM sleep (theta rhythm), inadequate synchronization of excitation would lead CA1 pyramidal cells to function as essentially linear devices. Using a detailed single neuron model, we replicated the experimentally observed synchronization effect for brief inputs mimicking single synaptic release events. When synapses were driven instead by double pulses, more representative of the bursty inputs that occur in vivo, we found that the tolerance for input desynchronization was increased by more than an order of magnitude. The effect depended mainly on paired-pulse facilitation of NMDA receptor-mediated responses at Schaffer collateral synapses. Our results suggest that CA1 pyramidal cells could function as non-linear integrative units in all major hippocampal states. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3214726/ /pubmed/22171217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2011.00044 Text en Copyright © 2011 Gómez González, Mel and Poirazi. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Gómez González, José Francisco
Mel, Bartlett W.
Poirazi, Panayiota
Distinguishing Linear vs. Non-Linear Integration in CA1 Radial Oblique Dendrites: It’s about Time
title Distinguishing Linear vs. Non-Linear Integration in CA1 Radial Oblique Dendrites: It’s about Time
title_full Distinguishing Linear vs. Non-Linear Integration in CA1 Radial Oblique Dendrites: It’s about Time
title_fullStr Distinguishing Linear vs. Non-Linear Integration in CA1 Radial Oblique Dendrites: It’s about Time
title_full_unstemmed Distinguishing Linear vs. Non-Linear Integration in CA1 Radial Oblique Dendrites: It’s about Time
title_short Distinguishing Linear vs. Non-Linear Integration in CA1 Radial Oblique Dendrites: It’s about Time
title_sort distinguishing linear vs. non-linear integration in ca1 radial oblique dendrites: it’s about time
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22171217
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2011.00044
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezgonzalezjosefrancisco distinguishinglinearvsnonlinearintegrationinca1radialobliquedendritesitsabouttime
AT melbartlettw distinguishinglinearvsnonlinearintegrationinca1radialobliquedendritesitsabouttime
AT poirazipanayiota distinguishinglinearvsnonlinearintegrationinca1radialobliquedendritesitsabouttime