Cargando…
The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note
PURPOSE: Since we reported about a landmark technique to reopen an occluded subclavian artery, we have faced difficulty in using protection devices in the vertebral artery to protect against thromboembolism from the reversed steal phenomenon after angioplasty and stenting. Therefore, we are presenti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22125755 http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2011.6.2.89 |
_version_ | 1782216324300144640 |
---|---|
author | Park, Soonchan Kwak, Jae Hyuk Baek, Hye Jin Park, Jee Won Kim, Jong Sung Suh, Dae Chul |
author_facet | Park, Soonchan Kwak, Jae Hyuk Baek, Hye Jin Park, Jee Won Kim, Jong Sung Suh, Dae Chul |
author_sort | Park, Soonchan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Since we reported about a landmark technique to reopen an occluded subclavian artery, we have faced difficulty in using protection devices in the vertebral artery to protect against thromboembolism from the reversed steal phenomenon after angioplasty and stenting. Therefore, we are presenting an optimal solution in using a protection device while recanalizing the occluded subclavian artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 21 cases of stenting for subclavian artery steno-occlusion, we applied the landmark technique at the opposite end of an occluded segment in 4 patients and used a protection device in two patients. Because the embolic protection device was placed in the vertebral artery via the brachial artery, optimal angioplasty and stenting via the brachial route were limited. Therefore, angioplasty via the trans-brachial approach was needed to be followed by stenting through a trans-femoral approach. We estimated the safe and optimal steps for placement and retrieval of the protection devices in addition to stenting. RESULTS: The procedure was safely performed when a stent was introduced via the femoral artery and a protection device was used via the brachial artery. However, in cases when a guidewire wasn't passed via the transfemoral route, simultaneous use of two systems via the brachial route could cause friction of devices or trapping of protection devices in a stent. When a protection device was trapped in a deployed stent, we retrieved the protection device with a 4F angiocatheter by selectively rotating the catheter tip. To avoid such procedural difficulty, we recommend using a transbrachial angioplasty followed by trans-femoral stenting while placing the protection device in the vertebral artery via the trans-brachial route. CONCLUSION: If a guidewire is not passed through using a trans-femoral approach while performing the landmark technique, changing the stenting route from brachial to the femoral artery can be useful after securing the lumen in the occluded subclavian artery after angioplasty via the brachial artery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3214817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32148172011-11-28 The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note Park, Soonchan Kwak, Jae Hyuk Baek, Hye Jin Park, Jee Won Kim, Jong Sung Suh, Dae Chul Neurointervention Technical Note PURPOSE: Since we reported about a landmark technique to reopen an occluded subclavian artery, we have faced difficulty in using protection devices in the vertebral artery to protect against thromboembolism from the reversed steal phenomenon after angioplasty and stenting. Therefore, we are presenting an optimal solution in using a protection device while recanalizing the occluded subclavian artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 21 cases of stenting for subclavian artery steno-occlusion, we applied the landmark technique at the opposite end of an occluded segment in 4 patients and used a protection device in two patients. Because the embolic protection device was placed in the vertebral artery via the brachial artery, optimal angioplasty and stenting via the brachial route were limited. Therefore, angioplasty via the trans-brachial approach was needed to be followed by stenting through a trans-femoral approach. We estimated the safe and optimal steps for placement and retrieval of the protection devices in addition to stenting. RESULTS: The procedure was safely performed when a stent was introduced via the femoral artery and a protection device was used via the brachial artery. However, in cases when a guidewire wasn't passed via the transfemoral route, simultaneous use of two systems via the brachial route could cause friction of devices or trapping of protection devices in a stent. When a protection device was trapped in a deployed stent, we retrieved the protection device with a 4F angiocatheter by selectively rotating the catheter tip. To avoid such procedural difficulty, we recommend using a transbrachial angioplasty followed by trans-femoral stenting while placing the protection device in the vertebral artery via the trans-brachial route. CONCLUSION: If a guidewire is not passed through using a trans-femoral approach while performing the landmark technique, changing the stenting route from brachial to the femoral artery can be useful after securing the lumen in the occluded subclavian artery after angioplasty via the brachial artery. Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology 2011-08 2011-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3214817/ /pubmed/22125755 http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2011.6.2.89 Text en Copyright © 2011 Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Park, Soonchan Kwak, Jae Hyuk Baek, Hye Jin Park, Jee Won Kim, Jong Sung Suh, Dae Chul The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note |
title | The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note |
title_full | The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note |
title_fullStr | The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note |
title_short | The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note |
title_sort | use of protection device in landmark-wire technique of symptomatic subclavian artery occlusion with combined approach via trans-femoral vs. trans-brachial arteries: technical note |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22125755 http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2011.6.2.89 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parksoonchan theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT kwakjaehyuk theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT baekhyejin theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT parkjeewon theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT kimjongsung theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT suhdaechul theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT parksoonchan useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT kwakjaehyuk useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT baekhyejin useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT parkjeewon useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT kimjongsung useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote AT suhdaechul useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote |