Cargando…

The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note

PURPOSE: Since we reported about a landmark technique to reopen an occluded subclavian artery, we have faced difficulty in using protection devices in the vertebral artery to protect against thromboembolism from the reversed steal phenomenon after angioplasty and stenting. Therefore, we are presenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Soonchan, Kwak, Jae Hyuk, Baek, Hye Jin, Park, Jee Won, Kim, Jong Sung, Suh, Dae Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22125755
http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2011.6.2.89
_version_ 1782216324300144640
author Park, Soonchan
Kwak, Jae Hyuk
Baek, Hye Jin
Park, Jee Won
Kim, Jong Sung
Suh, Dae Chul
author_facet Park, Soonchan
Kwak, Jae Hyuk
Baek, Hye Jin
Park, Jee Won
Kim, Jong Sung
Suh, Dae Chul
author_sort Park, Soonchan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Since we reported about a landmark technique to reopen an occluded subclavian artery, we have faced difficulty in using protection devices in the vertebral artery to protect against thromboembolism from the reversed steal phenomenon after angioplasty and stenting. Therefore, we are presenting an optimal solution in using a protection device while recanalizing the occluded subclavian artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 21 cases of stenting for subclavian artery steno-occlusion, we applied the landmark technique at the opposite end of an occluded segment in 4 patients and used a protection device in two patients. Because the embolic protection device was placed in the vertebral artery via the brachial artery, optimal angioplasty and stenting via the brachial route were limited. Therefore, angioplasty via the trans-brachial approach was needed to be followed by stenting through a trans-femoral approach. We estimated the safe and optimal steps for placement and retrieval of the protection devices in addition to stenting. RESULTS: The procedure was safely performed when a stent was introduced via the femoral artery and a protection device was used via the brachial artery. However, in cases when a guidewire wasn't passed via the transfemoral route, simultaneous use of two systems via the brachial route could cause friction of devices or trapping of protection devices in a stent. When a protection device was trapped in a deployed stent, we retrieved the protection device with a 4F angiocatheter by selectively rotating the catheter tip. To avoid such procedural difficulty, we recommend using a transbrachial angioplasty followed by trans-femoral stenting while placing the protection device in the vertebral artery via the trans-brachial route. CONCLUSION: If a guidewire is not passed through using a trans-femoral approach while performing the landmark technique, changing the stenting route from brachial to the femoral artery can be useful after securing the lumen in the occluded subclavian artery after angioplasty via the brachial artery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3214817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32148172011-11-28 The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note Park, Soonchan Kwak, Jae Hyuk Baek, Hye Jin Park, Jee Won Kim, Jong Sung Suh, Dae Chul Neurointervention Technical Note PURPOSE: Since we reported about a landmark technique to reopen an occluded subclavian artery, we have faced difficulty in using protection devices in the vertebral artery to protect against thromboembolism from the reversed steal phenomenon after angioplasty and stenting. Therefore, we are presenting an optimal solution in using a protection device while recanalizing the occluded subclavian artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 21 cases of stenting for subclavian artery steno-occlusion, we applied the landmark technique at the opposite end of an occluded segment in 4 patients and used a protection device in two patients. Because the embolic protection device was placed in the vertebral artery via the brachial artery, optimal angioplasty and stenting via the brachial route were limited. Therefore, angioplasty via the trans-brachial approach was needed to be followed by stenting through a trans-femoral approach. We estimated the safe and optimal steps for placement and retrieval of the protection devices in addition to stenting. RESULTS: The procedure was safely performed when a stent was introduced via the femoral artery and a protection device was used via the brachial artery. However, in cases when a guidewire wasn't passed via the transfemoral route, simultaneous use of two systems via the brachial route could cause friction of devices or trapping of protection devices in a stent. When a protection device was trapped in a deployed stent, we retrieved the protection device with a 4F angiocatheter by selectively rotating the catheter tip. To avoid such procedural difficulty, we recommend using a transbrachial angioplasty followed by trans-femoral stenting while placing the protection device in the vertebral artery via the trans-brachial route. CONCLUSION: If a guidewire is not passed through using a trans-femoral approach while performing the landmark technique, changing the stenting route from brachial to the femoral artery can be useful after securing the lumen in the occluded subclavian artery after angioplasty via the brachial artery. Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology 2011-08 2011-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3214817/ /pubmed/22125755 http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2011.6.2.89 Text en Copyright © 2011 Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Park, Soonchan
Kwak, Jae Hyuk
Baek, Hye Jin
Park, Jee Won
Kim, Jong Sung
Suh, Dae Chul
The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note
title The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note
title_full The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note
title_fullStr The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note
title_short The Use of Protection Device in Landmark-wire Technique of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Occlusion with Combined Approach via Trans-femoral vs. Trans-brachial Arteries: Technical note
title_sort use of protection device in landmark-wire technique of symptomatic subclavian artery occlusion with combined approach via trans-femoral vs. trans-brachial arteries: technical note
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22125755
http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2011.6.2.89
work_keys_str_mv AT parksoonchan theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT kwakjaehyuk theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT baekhyejin theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT parkjeewon theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT kimjongsung theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT suhdaechul theuseofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT parksoonchan useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT kwakjaehyuk useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT baekhyejin useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT parkjeewon useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT kimjongsung useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote
AT suhdaechul useofprotectiondeviceinlandmarkwiretechniqueofsymptomaticsubclavianarteryocclusionwithcombinedapproachviatransfemoralvstransbrachialarteriestechnicalnote