Cargando…

The responsiveness of sensibility and strength tests in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression

BACKGROUND: Several clinical measures of sensory and motor function are used alongside patient-rated questionnaires to assess outcomes of carpal tunnel decompression. However there is a lack of evidence regarding which clinical tests are most responsive to clinically important change over time. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jerosch-Herold, Christina, Shepstone, Lee, Miller, Leanne, Chapman, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22032626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-244
_version_ 1782216328178827264
author Jerosch-Herold, Christina
Shepstone, Lee
Miller, Leanne
Chapman, Peter
author_facet Jerosch-Herold, Christina
Shepstone, Lee
Miller, Leanne
Chapman, Peter
author_sort Jerosch-Herold, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several clinical measures of sensory and motor function are used alongside patient-rated questionnaires to assess outcomes of carpal tunnel decompression. However there is a lack of evidence regarding which clinical tests are most responsive to clinically important change over time. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study 63 patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression were assessed using standardised clinician-derived and patient reported outcomes before surgery, at 4 and 8 months follow up. Clinical sensory assessments included: touch threshold with monofilaments (WEST), shape-texture identification (STI™ test), static two-point discrimination (Mackinnon-Dellon Disk-Criminator) and the locognosia test. Motor assessments included: grip and tripod pinch strength using a digital grip analyser (MIE), manual muscle testing of abductor pollicis brevis and opponens pollicis using the Rotterdam Intrinsic Handheld Myometer (RIHM). The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) was used as a patient rated outcome measure. RESULTS: Relative responsiveness at 4 months was highest for the BCTQ symptom severity scale with moderate to large effects sizes (ES = -1.43) followed by the BCTQ function scale (ES = -0.71). The WEST and STI™ were the most responsive sensory tests at 4 months showing moderate effect sizes (WEST ES = 0.55, STI ES = 0.52). Grip and pinch strength had a relatively higher responsiveness compared to thenar muscle strength but effect sizes for all motor tests were very small (ES ≤0.10) or negative indicating a decline compared to baseline in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical assessment of sensibility touch threshold assessed by monofilaments (WEST) and tactile gnosis measured with the STI™ test are the most responsive tests and are recommended for future studies. The use of handheld myometry (RIHM) for manual muscle testing, despite more specifically targeting thenar muscles, was less responsive than grip or tripod pinch testing using the digital grip analyser (MIE). When assessing power and pinch strength the effect of other concomitant conditions such as degenerative joint disease on strength needs to be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3214851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32148512011-11-15 The responsiveness of sensibility and strength tests in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression Jerosch-Herold, Christina Shepstone, Lee Miller, Leanne Chapman, Peter BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Several clinical measures of sensory and motor function are used alongside patient-rated questionnaires to assess outcomes of carpal tunnel decompression. However there is a lack of evidence regarding which clinical tests are most responsive to clinically important change over time. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study 63 patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression were assessed using standardised clinician-derived and patient reported outcomes before surgery, at 4 and 8 months follow up. Clinical sensory assessments included: touch threshold with monofilaments (WEST), shape-texture identification (STI™ test), static two-point discrimination (Mackinnon-Dellon Disk-Criminator) and the locognosia test. Motor assessments included: grip and tripod pinch strength using a digital grip analyser (MIE), manual muscle testing of abductor pollicis brevis and opponens pollicis using the Rotterdam Intrinsic Handheld Myometer (RIHM). The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) was used as a patient rated outcome measure. RESULTS: Relative responsiveness at 4 months was highest for the BCTQ symptom severity scale with moderate to large effects sizes (ES = -1.43) followed by the BCTQ function scale (ES = -0.71). The WEST and STI™ were the most responsive sensory tests at 4 months showing moderate effect sizes (WEST ES = 0.55, STI ES = 0.52). Grip and pinch strength had a relatively higher responsiveness compared to thenar muscle strength but effect sizes for all motor tests were very small (ES ≤0.10) or negative indicating a decline compared to baseline in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical assessment of sensibility touch threshold assessed by monofilaments (WEST) and tactile gnosis measured with the STI™ test are the most responsive tests and are recommended for future studies. The use of handheld myometry (RIHM) for manual muscle testing, despite more specifically targeting thenar muscles, was less responsive than grip or tripod pinch testing using the digital grip analyser (MIE). When assessing power and pinch strength the effect of other concomitant conditions such as degenerative joint disease on strength needs to be considered. BioMed Central 2011-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3214851/ /pubmed/22032626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-244 Text en Copyright ©2011 Jerosch-Herold et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jerosch-Herold, Christina
Shepstone, Lee
Miller, Leanne
Chapman, Peter
The responsiveness of sensibility and strength tests in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression
title The responsiveness of sensibility and strength tests in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression
title_full The responsiveness of sensibility and strength tests in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression
title_fullStr The responsiveness of sensibility and strength tests in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression
title_full_unstemmed The responsiveness of sensibility and strength tests in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression
title_short The responsiveness of sensibility and strength tests in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression
title_sort responsiveness of sensibility and strength tests in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22032626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-244
work_keys_str_mv AT jeroschheroldchristina theresponsivenessofsensibilityandstrengthtestsinpatientsundergoingcarpaltunneldecompression
AT shepstonelee theresponsivenessofsensibilityandstrengthtestsinpatientsundergoingcarpaltunneldecompression
AT millerleanne theresponsivenessofsensibilityandstrengthtestsinpatientsundergoingcarpaltunneldecompression
AT chapmanpeter theresponsivenessofsensibilityandstrengthtestsinpatientsundergoingcarpaltunneldecompression
AT jeroschheroldchristina responsivenessofsensibilityandstrengthtestsinpatientsundergoingcarpaltunneldecompression
AT shepstonelee responsivenessofsensibilityandstrengthtestsinpatientsundergoingcarpaltunneldecompression
AT millerleanne responsivenessofsensibilityandstrengthtestsinpatientsundergoingcarpaltunneldecompression
AT chapmanpeter responsivenessofsensibilityandstrengthtestsinpatientsundergoingcarpaltunneldecompression