Cargando…

The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest affects 30-35, 000 hospitalised patients in the UK every year. For these patients to be given the best chance of survival, high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) must be delivered, however the quality of CPR in real-life is often suboptimal. CPR feedback devices...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perkins, Gavin D, Davies, Robin P, Quinton, Sarah, Woolley, Sarah, Gao, Fang, Abella, Ben, Stallard, Nigel, Cooke, Matthew W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22008636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-58
_version_ 1782216335391981568
author Perkins, Gavin D
Davies, Robin P
Quinton, Sarah
Woolley, Sarah
Gao, Fang
Abella, Ben
Stallard, Nigel
Cooke, Matthew W
author_facet Perkins, Gavin D
Davies, Robin P
Quinton, Sarah
Woolley, Sarah
Gao, Fang
Abella, Ben
Stallard, Nigel
Cooke, Matthew W
author_sort Perkins, Gavin D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest affects 30-35, 000 hospitalised patients in the UK every year. For these patients to be given the best chance of survival, high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) must be delivered, however the quality of CPR in real-life is often suboptimal. CPR feedback devices have been shown to improve CPR quality in the pre-hospital setting and post-event debriefing can improve adherence to guidelines and CPR quality. However, the evidence for use of these improvement methods in hospital remains unclear. The CPR quality improvement initiative is a prospective cohort study of the Q-CPR real-time feedback device combined with post-event debriefing in hospitalised adult patients who sustain a cardiac arrest. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective of this trial is to assess whether a CPR quality improvement initiative will improve rate of return of sustained spontaneous circulation in in-hospital-cardiac-arrest patients. The study is set in one NHS trust operating three hospital sites. Secondary objectives will evaluate: any return of spontaneous circulation; survival to hospital discharge and patient cerebral performance category at discharge; quality of CPR variables and cardiac arrest team factors. Methods: All three sites will have an initial control phase before any improvements are implemented; site 1 will implement audiovisual feedback combined with post event debriefing, site 2 will implement audiovisual feedback only and site 3 will remain as a control site to measure any changes in outcome due to any other trust-wide changes in resuscitation practice. All adult patients sustaining a cardiac arrest and receiving resuscitation from the hospital cardiac arrest team will be included. Patients will be excluded if; they have a Do-not-attempt resuscitation order written and documented in their medical records, the cardiac arrest is not attended by a resuscitation team, the arrest occurs out-of-hospital or the patient has previously participated in this study. The trial will recruit a total of 912 patients from the three hospital sites. CONCLUSION: This trial will evaluate patient and process focussed outcomes following the implementation of a CPR quality improvement initiative using real-time audiovisual feedback and post event debriefing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN56583860
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3214886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32148862011-11-15 The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol Perkins, Gavin D Davies, Robin P Quinton, Sarah Woolley, Sarah Gao, Fang Abella, Ben Stallard, Nigel Cooke, Matthew W Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest affects 30-35, 000 hospitalised patients in the UK every year. For these patients to be given the best chance of survival, high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) must be delivered, however the quality of CPR in real-life is often suboptimal. CPR feedback devices have been shown to improve CPR quality in the pre-hospital setting and post-event debriefing can improve adherence to guidelines and CPR quality. However, the evidence for use of these improvement methods in hospital remains unclear. The CPR quality improvement initiative is a prospective cohort study of the Q-CPR real-time feedback device combined with post-event debriefing in hospitalised adult patients who sustain a cardiac arrest. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective of this trial is to assess whether a CPR quality improvement initiative will improve rate of return of sustained spontaneous circulation in in-hospital-cardiac-arrest patients. The study is set in one NHS trust operating three hospital sites. Secondary objectives will evaluate: any return of spontaneous circulation; survival to hospital discharge and patient cerebral performance category at discharge; quality of CPR variables and cardiac arrest team factors. Methods: All three sites will have an initial control phase before any improvements are implemented; site 1 will implement audiovisual feedback combined with post event debriefing, site 2 will implement audiovisual feedback only and site 3 will remain as a control site to measure any changes in outcome due to any other trust-wide changes in resuscitation practice. All adult patients sustaining a cardiac arrest and receiving resuscitation from the hospital cardiac arrest team will be included. Patients will be excluded if; they have a Do-not-attempt resuscitation order written and documented in their medical records, the cardiac arrest is not attended by a resuscitation team, the arrest occurs out-of-hospital or the patient has previously participated in this study. The trial will recruit a total of 912 patients from the three hospital sites. CONCLUSION: This trial will evaluate patient and process focussed outcomes following the implementation of a CPR quality improvement initiative using real-time audiovisual feedback and post event debriefing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN56583860 BioMed Central 2011-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3214886/ /pubmed/22008636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-58 Text en Copyright ©2011 Perkins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Perkins, Gavin D
Davies, Robin P
Quinton, Sarah
Woolley, Sarah
Gao, Fang
Abella, Ben
Stallard, Nigel
Cooke, Matthew W
The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol
title The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol
title_full The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol
title_fullStr The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol
title_short The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol
title_sort effect of real-time cpr feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: a cohort study: trial protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22008636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-58
work_keys_str_mv AT perkinsgavind theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT daviesrobinp theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT quintonsarah theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT woolleysarah theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT gaofang theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT abellaben theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT stallardnigel theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT cookemattheww theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT perkinsgavind effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT daviesrobinp effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT quintonsarah effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT woolleysarah effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT gaofang effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT abellaben effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT stallardnigel effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol
AT cookemattheww effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol