Cargando…
The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol
BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest affects 30-35, 000 hospitalised patients in the UK every year. For these patients to be given the best chance of survival, high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) must be delivered, however the quality of CPR in real-life is often suboptimal. CPR feedback devices...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22008636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-58 |
_version_ | 1782216335391981568 |
---|---|
author | Perkins, Gavin D Davies, Robin P Quinton, Sarah Woolley, Sarah Gao, Fang Abella, Ben Stallard, Nigel Cooke, Matthew W |
author_facet | Perkins, Gavin D Davies, Robin P Quinton, Sarah Woolley, Sarah Gao, Fang Abella, Ben Stallard, Nigel Cooke, Matthew W |
author_sort | Perkins, Gavin D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest affects 30-35, 000 hospitalised patients in the UK every year. For these patients to be given the best chance of survival, high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) must be delivered, however the quality of CPR in real-life is often suboptimal. CPR feedback devices have been shown to improve CPR quality in the pre-hospital setting and post-event debriefing can improve adherence to guidelines and CPR quality. However, the evidence for use of these improvement methods in hospital remains unclear. The CPR quality improvement initiative is a prospective cohort study of the Q-CPR real-time feedback device combined with post-event debriefing in hospitalised adult patients who sustain a cardiac arrest. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective of this trial is to assess whether a CPR quality improvement initiative will improve rate of return of sustained spontaneous circulation in in-hospital-cardiac-arrest patients. The study is set in one NHS trust operating three hospital sites. Secondary objectives will evaluate: any return of spontaneous circulation; survival to hospital discharge and patient cerebral performance category at discharge; quality of CPR variables and cardiac arrest team factors. Methods: All three sites will have an initial control phase before any improvements are implemented; site 1 will implement audiovisual feedback combined with post event debriefing, site 2 will implement audiovisual feedback only and site 3 will remain as a control site to measure any changes in outcome due to any other trust-wide changes in resuscitation practice. All adult patients sustaining a cardiac arrest and receiving resuscitation from the hospital cardiac arrest team will be included. Patients will be excluded if; they have a Do-not-attempt resuscitation order written and documented in their medical records, the cardiac arrest is not attended by a resuscitation team, the arrest occurs out-of-hospital or the patient has previously participated in this study. The trial will recruit a total of 912 patients from the three hospital sites. CONCLUSION: This trial will evaluate patient and process focussed outcomes following the implementation of a CPR quality improvement initiative using real-time audiovisual feedback and post event debriefing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN56583860 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3214886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32148862011-11-15 The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol Perkins, Gavin D Davies, Robin P Quinton, Sarah Woolley, Sarah Gao, Fang Abella, Ben Stallard, Nigel Cooke, Matthew W Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest affects 30-35, 000 hospitalised patients in the UK every year. For these patients to be given the best chance of survival, high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) must be delivered, however the quality of CPR in real-life is often suboptimal. CPR feedback devices have been shown to improve CPR quality in the pre-hospital setting and post-event debriefing can improve adherence to guidelines and CPR quality. However, the evidence for use of these improvement methods in hospital remains unclear. The CPR quality improvement initiative is a prospective cohort study of the Q-CPR real-time feedback device combined with post-event debriefing in hospitalised adult patients who sustain a cardiac arrest. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective of this trial is to assess whether a CPR quality improvement initiative will improve rate of return of sustained spontaneous circulation in in-hospital-cardiac-arrest patients. The study is set in one NHS trust operating three hospital sites. Secondary objectives will evaluate: any return of spontaneous circulation; survival to hospital discharge and patient cerebral performance category at discharge; quality of CPR variables and cardiac arrest team factors. Methods: All three sites will have an initial control phase before any improvements are implemented; site 1 will implement audiovisual feedback combined with post event debriefing, site 2 will implement audiovisual feedback only and site 3 will remain as a control site to measure any changes in outcome due to any other trust-wide changes in resuscitation practice. All adult patients sustaining a cardiac arrest and receiving resuscitation from the hospital cardiac arrest team will be included. Patients will be excluded if; they have a Do-not-attempt resuscitation order written and documented in their medical records, the cardiac arrest is not attended by a resuscitation team, the arrest occurs out-of-hospital or the patient has previously participated in this study. The trial will recruit a total of 912 patients from the three hospital sites. CONCLUSION: This trial will evaluate patient and process focussed outcomes following the implementation of a CPR quality improvement initiative using real-time audiovisual feedback and post event debriefing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN56583860 BioMed Central 2011-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3214886/ /pubmed/22008636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-58 Text en Copyright ©2011 Perkins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Perkins, Gavin D Davies, Robin P Quinton, Sarah Woolley, Sarah Gao, Fang Abella, Ben Stallard, Nigel Cooke, Matthew W The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol |
title | The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol |
title_full | The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol |
title_fullStr | The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol |
title_short | The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol |
title_sort | effect of real-time cpr feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: a cohort study: trial protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22008636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-58 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perkinsgavind theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT daviesrobinp theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT quintonsarah theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT woolleysarah theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT gaofang theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT abellaben theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT stallardnigel theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT cookemattheww theeffectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT perkinsgavind effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT daviesrobinp effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT quintonsarah effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT woolleysarah effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT gaofang effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT abellaben effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT stallardnigel effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol AT cookemattheww effectofrealtimecprfeedbackandposteventdebriefingonpatientandprocessesfocusedoutcomesacohortstudytrialprotocol |