Cargando…

Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey

BACKGROUND: The methodology used in the first Belgian food consumption survey followed to a large extent the instructions of the European Food Consumption (EFCOSUM) reports, where repeated 24-hour recalls (24HR) using EPIC-SOFT were recommended. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative validity of two n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Keyzer, Willem, Huybrechts, Inge, De Vriendt, Veerle, Vandevijvere, Stefanie, Slimani, Nadia, Van Oyen, Herman, De Henauw, Stefaan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22084625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v55i0.7307
_version_ 1782216361963945984
author De Keyzer, Willem
Huybrechts, Inge
De Vriendt, Veerle
Vandevijvere, Stefanie
Slimani, Nadia
Van Oyen, Herman
De Henauw, Stefaan
author_facet De Keyzer, Willem
Huybrechts, Inge
De Vriendt, Veerle
Vandevijvere, Stefanie
Slimani, Nadia
Van Oyen, Herman
De Henauw, Stefaan
author_sort De Keyzer, Willem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The methodology used in the first Belgian food consumption survey followed to a large extent the instructions of the European Food Consumption (EFCOSUM) reports, where repeated 24-hour recalls (24HR) using EPIC-SOFT were recommended. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative validity of two non-consecutive 24HR using EPIC-SOFT by comparison with 5-day estimated dietary records (EDR). To assess misreporting in energy for both methods by comparing energy intake with energy expenditure from accelerometery in a subsample. DESIGN: A total of 175 subjects (aged 15 and over) were recruited to participate in the study. Repeated 24HR were performed with an interval of 2–8 weeks. After completion of the second interview, subjects were instructed to keep an EDR. Dietary intakes were adjusted for within-person variability to reflect usual intakes. A Student's t-test was calculated to assess differences between both methods. Spearman and Kappa correlation coefficients were used to investigate agreement. RESULTS: In total, 127 subjects completed the required repeated 24HR, as well as the five record days. From 76 participants, accelerometer data were available. In both methods, about 35% of participants had ratios of Energy Intake/Total Energy Expenditure (EI/TEE) above or below 95% confidence intervals for EI/TEE, suggesting misreporting of energy. Significant differences between the two dietary intake methods were found for total energy, total fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, alcohol, vitamin C, thiamine, riboflavin and iron. In general, intakes from 24HR were higher compared to EDR. Correlation coefficients for all nutrients ranged from 0.16 for thiamine to 0.70 for water. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study show that in the context of nutritional surveillance, duplicate 24HR can be used to asses intakes of protein, carbohydrates, starch, sugar, water, potassium and calcium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3215303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32153032011-11-14 Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey De Keyzer, Willem Huybrechts, Inge De Vriendt, Veerle Vandevijvere, Stefanie Slimani, Nadia Van Oyen, Herman De Henauw, Stefaan Food Nutr Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The methodology used in the first Belgian food consumption survey followed to a large extent the instructions of the European Food Consumption (EFCOSUM) reports, where repeated 24-hour recalls (24HR) using EPIC-SOFT were recommended. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative validity of two non-consecutive 24HR using EPIC-SOFT by comparison with 5-day estimated dietary records (EDR). To assess misreporting in energy for both methods by comparing energy intake with energy expenditure from accelerometery in a subsample. DESIGN: A total of 175 subjects (aged 15 and over) were recruited to participate in the study. Repeated 24HR were performed with an interval of 2–8 weeks. After completion of the second interview, subjects were instructed to keep an EDR. Dietary intakes were adjusted for within-person variability to reflect usual intakes. A Student's t-test was calculated to assess differences between both methods. Spearman and Kappa correlation coefficients were used to investigate agreement. RESULTS: In total, 127 subjects completed the required repeated 24HR, as well as the five record days. From 76 participants, accelerometer data were available. In both methods, about 35% of participants had ratios of Energy Intake/Total Energy Expenditure (EI/TEE) above or below 95% confidence intervals for EI/TEE, suggesting misreporting of energy. Significant differences between the two dietary intake methods were found for total energy, total fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, alcohol, vitamin C, thiamine, riboflavin and iron. In general, intakes from 24HR were higher compared to EDR. Correlation coefficients for all nutrients ranged from 0.16 for thiamine to 0.70 for water. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study show that in the context of nutritional surveillance, duplicate 24HR can be used to asses intakes of protein, carbohydrates, starch, sugar, water, potassium and calcium. Co-Action Publishing 2011-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3215303/ /pubmed/22084625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v55i0.7307 Text en © 2011 Willem De Keyzer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
De Keyzer, Willem
Huybrechts, Inge
De Vriendt, Veerle
Vandevijvere, Stefanie
Slimani, Nadia
Van Oyen, Herman
De Henauw, Stefaan
Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey
title Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey
title_full Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey
title_fullStr Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey
title_full_unstemmed Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey
title_short Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey
title_sort repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22084625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v55i0.7307
work_keys_str_mv AT dekeyzerwillem repeated24hourrecallsversusdietaryrecordsforestimatingnutrientintakesinanationalfoodconsumptionsurvey
AT huybrechtsinge repeated24hourrecallsversusdietaryrecordsforestimatingnutrientintakesinanationalfoodconsumptionsurvey
AT devriendtveerle repeated24hourrecallsversusdietaryrecordsforestimatingnutrientintakesinanationalfoodconsumptionsurvey
AT vandevijverestefanie repeated24hourrecallsversusdietaryrecordsforestimatingnutrientintakesinanationalfoodconsumptionsurvey
AT slimaninadia repeated24hourrecallsversusdietaryrecordsforestimatingnutrientintakesinanationalfoodconsumptionsurvey
AT vanoyenherman repeated24hourrecallsversusdietaryrecordsforestimatingnutrientintakesinanationalfoodconsumptionsurvey
AT dehenauwstefaan repeated24hourrecallsversusdietaryrecordsforestimatingnutrientintakesinanationalfoodconsumptionsurvey