Cargando…

Validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Guidance documents for the development and validation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) advise the use of conceptual frameworks, which outline the structure of the concept that a PRO aims to measure. It is unknown whether currently available PROs are based on conceptual frameworks. Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gimeno-Santos, Elena, Frei, Anja, Dobbels, Fabienne, Rüdell, Katja, Puhan, Milo A, Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21967887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-86
_version_ 1782216408550080512
author Gimeno-Santos, Elena
Frei, Anja
Dobbels, Fabienne
Rüdell, Katja
Puhan, Milo A
Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
author_facet Gimeno-Santos, Elena
Frei, Anja
Dobbels, Fabienne
Rüdell, Katja
Puhan, Milo A
Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
author_sort Gimeno-Santos, Elena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidance documents for the development and validation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) advise the use of conceptual frameworks, which outline the structure of the concept that a PRO aims to measure. It is unknown whether currently available PROs are based on conceptual frameworks. This study, which was limited to a specific case, had the following aims: (i) to identify conceptual frameworks of physical activity in chronic respiratory patients or similar populations (chronic heart disease patients or the elderly) and (ii) to assess whether the development and validation of PROs to measure physical activity in these populations were based on a conceptual framework of physical activity. METHODS: Two systematic reviews were conducted through searches of the Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cinahl databases prior to January 2010. RESULTS: In the first review, only 2 out of 581 references pertaining to physical activity in the defined populations provided a conceptual framework of physical activity in COPD patients. In the second review, out of 103 studies developing PROs to measure physical activity or related constructs, none were based on a conceptual framework of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings raise concerns about how the large body of evidence from studies that use physical activity PRO instruments should be evaluated by health care providers, guideline developers, and regulatory agencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3215640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32156402011-11-15 Validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review Gimeno-Santos, Elena Frei, Anja Dobbels, Fabienne Rüdell, Katja Puhan, Milo A Garcia-Aymerich, Judith Health Qual Life Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: Guidance documents for the development and validation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) advise the use of conceptual frameworks, which outline the structure of the concept that a PRO aims to measure. It is unknown whether currently available PROs are based on conceptual frameworks. This study, which was limited to a specific case, had the following aims: (i) to identify conceptual frameworks of physical activity in chronic respiratory patients or similar populations (chronic heart disease patients or the elderly) and (ii) to assess whether the development and validation of PROs to measure physical activity in these populations were based on a conceptual framework of physical activity. METHODS: Two systematic reviews were conducted through searches of the Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cinahl databases prior to January 2010. RESULTS: In the first review, only 2 out of 581 references pertaining to physical activity in the defined populations provided a conceptual framework of physical activity in COPD patients. In the second review, out of 103 studies developing PROs to measure physical activity or related constructs, none were based on a conceptual framework of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings raise concerns about how the large body of evidence from studies that use physical activity PRO instruments should be evaluated by health care providers, guideline developers, and regulatory agencies. BioMed Central 2011-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3215640/ /pubmed/21967887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-86 Text en Copyright ©2011 Gimeno-Santos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Gimeno-Santos, Elena
Frei, Anja
Dobbels, Fabienne
Rüdell, Katja
Puhan, Milo A
Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
Validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review
title Validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review
title_full Validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review
title_fullStr Validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review
title_short Validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review
title_sort validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21967887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-86
work_keys_str_mv AT gimenosantoselena validityofinstrumentstomeasurephysicalactivitymaybequestionableduetoalackofconceptualframeworksasystematicreview
AT freianja validityofinstrumentstomeasurephysicalactivitymaybequestionableduetoalackofconceptualframeworksasystematicreview
AT dobbelsfabienne validityofinstrumentstomeasurephysicalactivitymaybequestionableduetoalackofconceptualframeworksasystematicreview
AT rudellkatja validityofinstrumentstomeasurephysicalactivitymaybequestionableduetoalackofconceptualframeworksasystematicreview
AT puhanmiloa validityofinstrumentstomeasurephysicalactivitymaybequestionableduetoalackofconceptualframeworksasystematicreview
AT garciaaymerichjudith validityofinstrumentstomeasurephysicalactivitymaybequestionableduetoalackofconceptualframeworksasystematicreview