Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews

Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giraudeau, Bruno, Leyrat, Clémence, Le Gouge, Amélie, Léger, Julie, Caille, Agnès
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027557
_version_ 1782216427087855616
author Giraudeau, Bruno
Leyrat, Clémence
Le Gouge, Amélie
Léger, Julie
Caille, Agnès
author_facet Giraudeau, Bruno
Leyrat, Clémence
Le Gouge, Amélie
Léger, Julie
Caille, Agnès
author_sort Giraudeau, Bruno
collection PubMed
description Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose a simple method to identify such proposals. Our approach is based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, which is usually used in assessing agreement in studies with continuous ratings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3215721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32157212011-11-21 Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews Giraudeau, Bruno Leyrat, Clémence Le Gouge, Amélie Léger, Julie Caille, Agnès PLoS One Research Article Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose a simple method to identify such proposals. Our approach is based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, which is usually used in assessing agreement in studies with continuous ratings. Public Library of Science 2011-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3215721/ /pubmed/22110670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027557 Text en Giraudeau et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Giraudeau, Bruno
Leyrat, Clémence
Le Gouge, Amélie
Léger, Julie
Caille, Agnès
Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews
title Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews
title_full Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews
title_fullStr Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews
title_short Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews
title_sort peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027557
work_keys_str_mv AT giraudeaubruno peerreviewofgrantapplicationsasimplemethodtoidentifyproposalswithdiscordantreviews
AT leyratclemence peerreviewofgrantapplicationsasimplemethodtoidentifyproposalswithdiscordantreviews
AT legougeamelie peerreviewofgrantapplicationsasimplemethodtoidentifyproposalswithdiscordantreviews
AT legerjulie peerreviewofgrantapplicationsasimplemethodtoidentifyproposalswithdiscordantreviews
AT cailleagnes peerreviewofgrantapplicationsasimplemethodtoidentifyproposalswithdiscordantreviews

Ejemplares similares