Cargando…
Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews
Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose...
Autores principales: | Giraudeau, Bruno, Leyrat, Clémence, Le Gouge, Amélie, Léger, Julie, Caille, Agnès |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027557 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Participant Informed Consent in Cluster Randomized Trials: Review
por: Giraudeau, Bruno, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic
por: Leyrat, Clémence, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Intervention effect estimates in cluster randomized versus individually randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Leyrat, Clémence, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices
por: Conix, Stijn, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Transparent Peer Review of Grant Applications
por: Lee, Jung Hun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)