Cargando…
Testing Hardy-Weinberg Proportions in a Frequency-Matched Case-Control Genetic Association Study
In case-control genetic association studies, cases are subjects with the disease and controls are subjects without the disease. At the time of case-control data collection, information about secondary phenotypes is also collected. In addition to studies of primary diseases, there has been some inter...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027642 |
_version_ | 1782216432236363776 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jian Shete, Sanjay |
author_facet | Wang, Jian Shete, Sanjay |
author_sort | Wang, Jian |
collection | PubMed |
description | In case-control genetic association studies, cases are subjects with the disease and controls are subjects without the disease. At the time of case-control data collection, information about secondary phenotypes is also collected. In addition to studies of primary diseases, there has been some interest in studying genetic variants associated with secondary phenotypes. In genetic association studies, the deviation from Hardy-Weinberg proportion (HWP) of each genetic marker is assessed as an initial quality check to identify questionable genotypes. Generally, HWP tests are performed based on the controls for the primary disease or secondary phenotype. However, when the disease or phenotype of interest is common, the controls do not represent the general population. Therefore, using only controls for testing HWP can result in a highly inflated type I error rate for the disease- and/or phenotype-associated variants. Recently, two approaches, the likelihood ratio test (LRT) approach and the mixture HWP (mHWP) exact test were proposed for testing HWP in samples from case-control studies. Here, we show that these two approaches result in inflated type I error rates and could lead to the removal from further analysis of potential causal genetic variants associated with the primary disease and/or secondary phenotype when the study of primary disease is frequency-matched on the secondary phenotype. Therefore, we proposed alternative approaches, which extend the LRT and mHWP approaches, for assessing HWP that account for frequency matching. The goal was to maintain more (possible causative) single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the sample for further analysis. Our simulation results showed that both extended approaches could control type I error probabilities. We also applied the proposed approaches to test HWP for SNPs from a genome-wide association study of lung cancer that was frequency-matched on smoking status and found that the proposed approaches can keep more genetic variants for association studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3215743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32157432011-11-21 Testing Hardy-Weinberg Proportions in a Frequency-Matched Case-Control Genetic Association Study Wang, Jian Shete, Sanjay PLoS One Research Article In case-control genetic association studies, cases are subjects with the disease and controls are subjects without the disease. At the time of case-control data collection, information about secondary phenotypes is also collected. In addition to studies of primary diseases, there has been some interest in studying genetic variants associated with secondary phenotypes. In genetic association studies, the deviation from Hardy-Weinberg proportion (HWP) of each genetic marker is assessed as an initial quality check to identify questionable genotypes. Generally, HWP tests are performed based on the controls for the primary disease or secondary phenotype. However, when the disease or phenotype of interest is common, the controls do not represent the general population. Therefore, using only controls for testing HWP can result in a highly inflated type I error rate for the disease- and/or phenotype-associated variants. Recently, two approaches, the likelihood ratio test (LRT) approach and the mixture HWP (mHWP) exact test were proposed for testing HWP in samples from case-control studies. Here, we show that these two approaches result in inflated type I error rates and could lead to the removal from further analysis of potential causal genetic variants associated with the primary disease and/or secondary phenotype when the study of primary disease is frequency-matched on the secondary phenotype. Therefore, we proposed alternative approaches, which extend the LRT and mHWP approaches, for assessing HWP that account for frequency matching. The goal was to maintain more (possible causative) single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the sample for further analysis. Our simulation results showed that both extended approaches could control type I error probabilities. We also applied the proposed approaches to test HWP for SNPs from a genome-wide association study of lung cancer that was frequency-matched on smoking status and found that the proposed approaches can keep more genetic variants for association studies. Public Library of Science 2011-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3215743/ /pubmed/22110703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027642 Text en Wang, Shete. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Jian Shete, Sanjay Testing Hardy-Weinberg Proportions in a Frequency-Matched Case-Control Genetic Association Study |
title | Testing Hardy-Weinberg Proportions in a Frequency-Matched Case-Control Genetic Association Study |
title_full | Testing Hardy-Weinberg Proportions in a Frequency-Matched Case-Control Genetic Association Study |
title_fullStr | Testing Hardy-Weinberg Proportions in a Frequency-Matched Case-Control Genetic Association Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing Hardy-Weinberg Proportions in a Frequency-Matched Case-Control Genetic Association Study |
title_short | Testing Hardy-Weinberg Proportions in a Frequency-Matched Case-Control Genetic Association Study |
title_sort | testing hardy-weinberg proportions in a frequency-matched case-control genetic association study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027642 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjian testinghardyweinbergproportionsinafrequencymatchedcasecontrolgeneticassociationstudy AT shetesanjay testinghardyweinbergproportionsinafrequencymatchedcasecontrolgeneticassociationstudy |