Cargando…

Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of a formula derived from 159 living liver donors to estimate the liver size of a normal subject: standard liver weight (g) = 218 + body weight (kg) × 12.3 + 51 (if male). Standard liver volume (SLV) is attained by a conversion factor of 1.19 mL/g. METHODS: The total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, See Ching, Lo, Chung Mau, Chok, Kenneth S. H., Sharr, William W., Cheung, Tan To, Tsang, Simon H. Y., Chan, Albert C. Y., Fan, Sheung Tat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21484120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-011-9264-0
_version_ 1782216436084637696
author Chan, See Ching
Lo, Chung Mau
Chok, Kenneth S. H.
Sharr, William W.
Cheung, Tan To
Tsang, Simon H. Y.
Chan, Albert C. Y.
Fan, Sheung Tat
author_facet Chan, See Ching
Lo, Chung Mau
Chok, Kenneth S. H.
Sharr, William W.
Cheung, Tan To
Tsang, Simon H. Y.
Chan, Albert C. Y.
Fan, Sheung Tat
author_sort Chan, See Ching
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of a formula derived from 159 living liver donors to estimate the liver size of a normal subject: standard liver weight (g) = 218 + body weight (kg) × 12.3 + 51 (if male). Standard liver volume (SLV) is attained by a conversion factor of 1.19 mL/g. METHODS: The total liver volume (TLV) of each of the subsequent consecutive 126 living liver donors was determined using the right liver graft weight (RGW) on the back table, right/left liver volume ratio on computed tomography, and the conversion factor. The estimated right liver graft weight (ERGW) was determined by the right liver volume on computed tomography (CT) and the conversion factor. SLV and ERGW were compared with TLV and RGW, respectively, by paired sample t test. RESULTS: Donor characteristics of both series were similar. SLV and TLV were 1,099.6 ± 139.6 and 1,108.5 ± 175.2 mL, respectively, (R (2) = 0.476) (p = 0.435). The difference between SLV and TLV was only −8.9 ± 128.2 mL (−1.0 ± 11.7%). ERGW and RGW were 601.5 ± 104.1 and 597.1 ± 102.2 g, respectively (R (2) = 0.781) (p = 0.332). The conversion factor from liver weight to volume for this series was 1.20 mL/g. The difference between ERGW and RGW was 4.3 ± 49.8 g (0.3 ± 8.8%). ERGW was smaller than RGW for over 10% (range 0.21–40.66 g) in 18 of the 126 donors. None had the underestimation of RGW by over 20%. CONCLUSION: SLV and graft weight estimations were accurate using the formula and conversion factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3215865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32158652011-12-09 Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation Chan, See Ching Lo, Chung Mau Chok, Kenneth S. H. Sharr, William W. Cheung, Tan To Tsang, Simon H. Y. Chan, Albert C. Y. Fan, Sheung Tat Hepatol Int Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of a formula derived from 159 living liver donors to estimate the liver size of a normal subject: standard liver weight (g) = 218 + body weight (kg) × 12.3 + 51 (if male). Standard liver volume (SLV) is attained by a conversion factor of 1.19 mL/g. METHODS: The total liver volume (TLV) of each of the subsequent consecutive 126 living liver donors was determined using the right liver graft weight (RGW) on the back table, right/left liver volume ratio on computed tomography, and the conversion factor. The estimated right liver graft weight (ERGW) was determined by the right liver volume on computed tomography (CT) and the conversion factor. SLV and ERGW were compared with TLV and RGW, respectively, by paired sample t test. RESULTS: Donor characteristics of both series were similar. SLV and TLV were 1,099.6 ± 139.6 and 1,108.5 ± 175.2 mL, respectively, (R (2) = 0.476) (p = 0.435). The difference between SLV and TLV was only −8.9 ± 128.2 mL (−1.0 ± 11.7%). ERGW and RGW were 601.5 ± 104.1 and 597.1 ± 102.2 g, respectively (R (2) = 0.781) (p = 0.332). The conversion factor from liver weight to volume for this series was 1.20 mL/g. The difference between ERGW and RGW was 4.3 ± 49.8 g (0.3 ± 8.8%). ERGW was smaller than RGW for over 10% (range 0.21–40.66 g) in 18 of the 126 donors. None had the underestimation of RGW by over 20%. CONCLUSION: SLV and graft weight estimations were accurate using the formula and conversion factor. Springer-Verlag 2011-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3215865/ /pubmed/21484120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-011-9264-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chan, See Ching
Lo, Chung Mau
Chok, Kenneth S. H.
Sharr, William W.
Cheung, Tan To
Tsang, Simon H. Y.
Chan, Albert C. Y.
Fan, Sheung Tat
Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation
title Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation
title_full Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation
title_fullStr Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation
title_short Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation
title_sort validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21484120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-011-9264-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chanseeching validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT lochungmau validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT chokkennethsh validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT sharrwilliamw validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT cheungtanto validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT tsangsimonhy validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT chanalbertcy validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT fansheungtat validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation