Cargando…
Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of a formula derived from 159 living liver donors to estimate the liver size of a normal subject: standard liver weight (g) = 218 + body weight (kg) × 12.3 + 51 (if male). Standard liver volume (SLV) is attained by a conversion factor of 1.19 mL/g. METHODS: The total...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21484120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-011-9264-0 |
_version_ | 1782216436084637696 |
---|---|
author | Chan, See Ching Lo, Chung Mau Chok, Kenneth S. H. Sharr, William W. Cheung, Tan To Tsang, Simon H. Y. Chan, Albert C. Y. Fan, Sheung Tat |
author_facet | Chan, See Ching Lo, Chung Mau Chok, Kenneth S. H. Sharr, William W. Cheung, Tan To Tsang, Simon H. Y. Chan, Albert C. Y. Fan, Sheung Tat |
author_sort | Chan, See Ching |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of a formula derived from 159 living liver donors to estimate the liver size of a normal subject: standard liver weight (g) = 218 + body weight (kg) × 12.3 + 51 (if male). Standard liver volume (SLV) is attained by a conversion factor of 1.19 mL/g. METHODS: The total liver volume (TLV) of each of the subsequent consecutive 126 living liver donors was determined using the right liver graft weight (RGW) on the back table, right/left liver volume ratio on computed tomography, and the conversion factor. The estimated right liver graft weight (ERGW) was determined by the right liver volume on computed tomography (CT) and the conversion factor. SLV and ERGW were compared with TLV and RGW, respectively, by paired sample t test. RESULTS: Donor characteristics of both series were similar. SLV and TLV were 1,099.6 ± 139.6 and 1,108.5 ± 175.2 mL, respectively, (R (2) = 0.476) (p = 0.435). The difference between SLV and TLV was only −8.9 ± 128.2 mL (−1.0 ± 11.7%). ERGW and RGW were 601.5 ± 104.1 and 597.1 ± 102.2 g, respectively (R (2) = 0.781) (p = 0.332). The conversion factor from liver weight to volume for this series was 1.20 mL/g. The difference between ERGW and RGW was 4.3 ± 49.8 g (0.3 ± 8.8%). ERGW was smaller than RGW for over 10% (range 0.21–40.66 g) in 18 of the 126 donors. None had the underestimation of RGW by over 20%. CONCLUSION: SLV and graft weight estimations were accurate using the formula and conversion factor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3215865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32158652011-12-09 Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation Chan, See Ching Lo, Chung Mau Chok, Kenneth S. H. Sharr, William W. Cheung, Tan To Tsang, Simon H. Y. Chan, Albert C. Y. Fan, Sheung Tat Hepatol Int Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of a formula derived from 159 living liver donors to estimate the liver size of a normal subject: standard liver weight (g) = 218 + body weight (kg) × 12.3 + 51 (if male). Standard liver volume (SLV) is attained by a conversion factor of 1.19 mL/g. METHODS: The total liver volume (TLV) of each of the subsequent consecutive 126 living liver donors was determined using the right liver graft weight (RGW) on the back table, right/left liver volume ratio on computed tomography, and the conversion factor. The estimated right liver graft weight (ERGW) was determined by the right liver volume on computed tomography (CT) and the conversion factor. SLV and ERGW were compared with TLV and RGW, respectively, by paired sample t test. RESULTS: Donor characteristics of both series were similar. SLV and TLV were 1,099.6 ± 139.6 and 1,108.5 ± 175.2 mL, respectively, (R (2) = 0.476) (p = 0.435). The difference between SLV and TLV was only −8.9 ± 128.2 mL (−1.0 ± 11.7%). ERGW and RGW were 601.5 ± 104.1 and 597.1 ± 102.2 g, respectively (R (2) = 0.781) (p = 0.332). The conversion factor from liver weight to volume for this series was 1.20 mL/g. The difference between ERGW and RGW was 4.3 ± 49.8 g (0.3 ± 8.8%). ERGW was smaller than RGW for over 10% (range 0.21–40.66 g) in 18 of the 126 donors. None had the underestimation of RGW by over 20%. CONCLUSION: SLV and graft weight estimations were accurate using the formula and conversion factor. Springer-Verlag 2011-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3215865/ /pubmed/21484120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-011-9264-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chan, See Ching Lo, Chung Mau Chok, Kenneth S. H. Sharr, William W. Cheung, Tan To Tsang, Simon H. Y. Chan, Albert C. Y. Fan, Sheung Tat Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation |
title | Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation |
title_full | Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation |
title_fullStr | Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation |
title_short | Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation |
title_sort | validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21484120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-011-9264-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chanseeching validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT lochungmau validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT chokkennethsh validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT sharrwilliamw validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT cheungtanto validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT tsangsimonhy validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT chanalbertcy validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT fansheungtat validationofgraftandstandardliversizepredictionsinrightliverlivingdonorlivertransplantation |