Cargando…

An Eight Component Decision-Making Model for Problem Gambling:A Systems Approach to Stimulate Integrative Research

Problem Gambling (PG) represents a serious problem for affected individuals, their families and society in general. Previous approaches to understanding PG have been confined to only a subset of the psychobiological factors influencing PG. We present a model that attempts to integrate potential caus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nussbaum, David, Honarmand, Kimia, Govoni, Richard, Kalahani-Bargis, Martina, Bass, Stephanie, Ni, Xinqun, LaForge, Kaitlyn, Burden, Andrea, Romero, Kristoffer, Basarke, Sonya, Courbasson, Christine, Deamond, Wade
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21191637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-010-9219-8
_version_ 1782216438369484800
author Nussbaum, David
Honarmand, Kimia
Govoni, Richard
Kalahani-Bargis, Martina
Bass, Stephanie
Ni, Xinqun
LaForge, Kaitlyn
Burden, Andrea
Romero, Kristoffer
Basarke, Sonya
Courbasson, Christine
Deamond, Wade
author_facet Nussbaum, David
Honarmand, Kimia
Govoni, Richard
Kalahani-Bargis, Martina
Bass, Stephanie
Ni, Xinqun
LaForge, Kaitlyn
Burden, Andrea
Romero, Kristoffer
Basarke, Sonya
Courbasson, Christine
Deamond, Wade
author_sort Nussbaum, David
collection PubMed
description Problem Gambling (PG) represents a serious problem for affected individuals, their families and society in general. Previous approaches to understanding PG have been confined to only a subset of the psychobiological factors influencing PG. We present a model that attempts to integrate potential causal factors across levels of organization, providing empirical evidence from the vast literature on PG and complimentary literatures in decision-making and addiction. The model posits that components are arranged systematically to bias decisions in favor of either immediately approaching or avoiding targets affording the opportunity for immediate reward. Dopamine, Testosterone and Endogenous Opioids favor immediate approach, while Serotonin and Cortisol favor inhibition. Glutamate is involved in associative learning between stimuli and promotes the approach response through its link to the DA reward system. GABA functions to monitor performance and curb impulsive decision-making. Finally, while very high levels of Norepinephrine can induce arousal to an extent that is detrimental to sound decision-making, the reactivity of the Norepinephrine system and its effects of Cortisol levels can shift the focus towards long-term consequences, thereby inhibiting impulsive decisions. Empirical evidence is provided showing the effects of each component on PG and decision-making across behavioural, neuropsychological, functional neuroimaging and genetic levels. Last, an effect size analysis of the growing pharmacotherapy literature is presented. It is hoped that this model will stimulate multi-level research to solidify our comprehension of biased decision-making in PG and suggest pharmacological and psychological approaches to treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3215875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32158752011-12-09 An Eight Component Decision-Making Model for Problem Gambling:A Systems Approach to Stimulate Integrative Research Nussbaum, David Honarmand, Kimia Govoni, Richard Kalahani-Bargis, Martina Bass, Stephanie Ni, Xinqun LaForge, Kaitlyn Burden, Andrea Romero, Kristoffer Basarke, Sonya Courbasson, Christine Deamond, Wade J Gambl Stud Review Paper Problem Gambling (PG) represents a serious problem for affected individuals, their families and society in general. Previous approaches to understanding PG have been confined to only a subset of the psychobiological factors influencing PG. We present a model that attempts to integrate potential causal factors across levels of organization, providing empirical evidence from the vast literature on PG and complimentary literatures in decision-making and addiction. The model posits that components are arranged systematically to bias decisions in favor of either immediately approaching or avoiding targets affording the opportunity for immediate reward. Dopamine, Testosterone and Endogenous Opioids favor immediate approach, while Serotonin and Cortisol favor inhibition. Glutamate is involved in associative learning between stimuli and promotes the approach response through its link to the DA reward system. GABA functions to monitor performance and curb impulsive decision-making. Finally, while very high levels of Norepinephrine can induce arousal to an extent that is detrimental to sound decision-making, the reactivity of the Norepinephrine system and its effects of Cortisol levels can shift the focus towards long-term consequences, thereby inhibiting impulsive decisions. Empirical evidence is provided showing the effects of each component on PG and decision-making across behavioural, neuropsychological, functional neuroimaging and genetic levels. Last, an effect size analysis of the growing pharmacotherapy literature is presented. It is hoped that this model will stimulate multi-level research to solidify our comprehension of biased decision-making in PG and suggest pharmacological and psychological approaches to treatment. Springer US 2010-12-30 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3215875/ /pubmed/21191637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-010-9219-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Nussbaum, David
Honarmand, Kimia
Govoni, Richard
Kalahani-Bargis, Martina
Bass, Stephanie
Ni, Xinqun
LaForge, Kaitlyn
Burden, Andrea
Romero, Kristoffer
Basarke, Sonya
Courbasson, Christine
Deamond, Wade
An Eight Component Decision-Making Model for Problem Gambling:A Systems Approach to Stimulate Integrative Research
title An Eight Component Decision-Making Model for Problem Gambling:A Systems Approach to Stimulate Integrative Research
title_full An Eight Component Decision-Making Model for Problem Gambling:A Systems Approach to Stimulate Integrative Research
title_fullStr An Eight Component Decision-Making Model for Problem Gambling:A Systems Approach to Stimulate Integrative Research
title_full_unstemmed An Eight Component Decision-Making Model for Problem Gambling:A Systems Approach to Stimulate Integrative Research
title_short An Eight Component Decision-Making Model for Problem Gambling:A Systems Approach to Stimulate Integrative Research
title_sort eight component decision-making model for problem gambling:a systems approach to stimulate integrative research
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21191637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-010-9219-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nussbaumdavid aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT honarmandkimia aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT govonirichard aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT kalahanibargismartina aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT bassstephanie aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT nixinqun aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT laforgekaitlyn aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT burdenandrea aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT romerokristoffer aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT basarkesonya aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT courbassonchristine aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT deamondwade aneightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT nussbaumdavid eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT honarmandkimia eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT govonirichard eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT kalahanibargismartina eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT bassstephanie eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT nixinqun eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT laforgekaitlyn eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT burdenandrea eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT romerokristoffer eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT basarkesonya eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT courbassonchristine eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch
AT deamondwade eightcomponentdecisionmakingmodelforproblemgamblingasystemsapproachtostimulateintegrativeresearch