Cargando…
Is Near-Infrared Spectroscopy a Reliable Method to Evaluate Clamping Ischemia during Carotid Surgery?
Guidelines do not include cerebral oximetry among monitoring for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in the detection of clamping ischemia and in the prevention of clamping-related neurologic deficits using, as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22135770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/156975 |
_version_ | 1782216482281750528 |
---|---|
author | Pedrini, Luciano Magnoni, Filippo Sensi, Luigi Pisano, Emilio Ballestrazzi, Maria Sandra Cirelli, Maria Rosaria Pilato, Alessandro |
author_facet | Pedrini, Luciano Magnoni, Filippo Sensi, Luigi Pisano, Emilio Ballestrazzi, Maria Sandra Cirelli, Maria Rosaria Pilato, Alessandro |
author_sort | Pedrini, Luciano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Guidelines do not include cerebral oximetry among monitoring for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in the detection of clamping ischemia and in the prevention of clamping-related neurologic deficits using, as a cutoff for shunting, a 20% regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO(2)) decrease if persistent more than 4 minutes, otherwise a 25% rSO(2) decrease. Bilateral rSO(2) was monitored continuously in patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia (GA). Data was recorded after clamping, declamping, during shunting and lowest values achieved. Preoperative neurologic, CT-scan, and vascular lesions were recorded. We reviewed 473 cases: 305 males (64.5%) mean age 73.3 ± 7.3. Three patients presented transient ischemic deficits at awakening, no perioperative stroke or death; 41 (8.7%) required shunting: 30 based on the initial rSO(2) value and 11 due to a decrease during surgery. Using the ROC curve analysis we found, for a >25% reduction from baseline value, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90.6%. Reliability, PPV, and NPV were 95.38%, 9%, and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, this study indicates the potential reliability of NIRS monitoring during CEA under GA, using a cutoff of 25% or a cutoff of 20% for prolonged hypoperfusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3216275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32162752011-12-01 Is Near-Infrared Spectroscopy a Reliable Method to Evaluate Clamping Ischemia during Carotid Surgery? Pedrini, Luciano Magnoni, Filippo Sensi, Luigi Pisano, Emilio Ballestrazzi, Maria Sandra Cirelli, Maria Rosaria Pilato, Alessandro Stroke Res Treat Clinical Study Guidelines do not include cerebral oximetry among monitoring for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in the detection of clamping ischemia and in the prevention of clamping-related neurologic deficits using, as a cutoff for shunting, a 20% regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO(2)) decrease if persistent more than 4 minutes, otherwise a 25% rSO(2) decrease. Bilateral rSO(2) was monitored continuously in patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia (GA). Data was recorded after clamping, declamping, during shunting and lowest values achieved. Preoperative neurologic, CT-scan, and vascular lesions were recorded. We reviewed 473 cases: 305 males (64.5%) mean age 73.3 ± 7.3. Three patients presented transient ischemic deficits at awakening, no perioperative stroke or death; 41 (8.7%) required shunting: 30 based on the initial rSO(2) value and 11 due to a decrease during surgery. Using the ROC curve analysis we found, for a >25% reduction from baseline value, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90.6%. Reliability, PPV, and NPV were 95.38%, 9%, and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, this study indicates the potential reliability of NIRS monitoring during CEA under GA, using a cutoff of 25% or a cutoff of 20% for prolonged hypoperfusion. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2011-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3216275/ /pubmed/22135770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/156975 Text en Copyright © 2012 Luciano Pedrini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Pedrini, Luciano Magnoni, Filippo Sensi, Luigi Pisano, Emilio Ballestrazzi, Maria Sandra Cirelli, Maria Rosaria Pilato, Alessandro Is Near-Infrared Spectroscopy a Reliable Method to Evaluate Clamping Ischemia during Carotid Surgery? |
title | Is Near-Infrared Spectroscopy a Reliable Method to Evaluate Clamping Ischemia during Carotid Surgery? |
title_full | Is Near-Infrared Spectroscopy a Reliable Method to Evaluate Clamping Ischemia during Carotid Surgery? |
title_fullStr | Is Near-Infrared Spectroscopy a Reliable Method to Evaluate Clamping Ischemia during Carotid Surgery? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Near-Infrared Spectroscopy a Reliable Method to Evaluate Clamping Ischemia during Carotid Surgery? |
title_short | Is Near-Infrared Spectroscopy a Reliable Method to Evaluate Clamping Ischemia during Carotid Surgery? |
title_sort | is near-infrared spectroscopy a reliable method to evaluate clamping ischemia during carotid surgery? |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22135770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/156975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pedriniluciano isnearinfraredspectroscopyareliablemethodtoevaluateclampingischemiaduringcarotidsurgery AT magnonifilippo isnearinfraredspectroscopyareliablemethodtoevaluateclampingischemiaduringcarotidsurgery AT sensiluigi isnearinfraredspectroscopyareliablemethodtoevaluateclampingischemiaduringcarotidsurgery AT pisanoemilio isnearinfraredspectroscopyareliablemethodtoevaluateclampingischemiaduringcarotidsurgery AT ballestrazzimariasandra isnearinfraredspectroscopyareliablemethodtoevaluateclampingischemiaduringcarotidsurgery AT cirellimariarosaria isnearinfraredspectroscopyareliablemethodtoevaluateclampingischemiaduringcarotidsurgery AT pilatoalessandro isnearinfraredspectroscopyareliablemethodtoevaluateclampingischemiaduringcarotidsurgery |