Cargando…

A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial Assessing Compliance, Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy to Treatment with Grass Allergy Tablets in 261 Patients with Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis

Background. Allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is considered a causal treatment of respiratory allergies. Compliance to the SLIT is an important aspect for a positive clinical outcome. Study Aim. To evaluate if compliance with grass Allergy Immunotherapy Tablet (AIT) can be increased...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alesina, Roberta, Milani, Massimo, Pecora, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22131999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/673502
_version_ 1782216511321014272
author Alesina, Roberta
Milani, Massimo
Pecora, Silvia
author_facet Alesina, Roberta
Milani, Massimo
Pecora, Silvia
author_sort Alesina, Roberta
collection PubMed
description Background. Allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is considered a causal treatment of respiratory allergies. Compliance to the SLIT is an important aspect for a positive clinical outcome. Study Aim. To evaluate if compliance with grass Allergy Immunotherapy Tablet (AIT) can be increased by providing an electronic compliance device (CED) (Memozax; a tablet-container with a programmable daily acoustic alarm). Patients and Methods. 261 patients with grass allergy were enrolled and randomized (1 : 1) to 1-year treatment with AIT (Grazax) using a CED (group A; n = 122) or without (Group B, n = 139). Compliance was measured through tablet count at each visit. Results. The 12-month compliance, mean (SD), in group A was 83% (21) and 83% (24) in group B. A total of 81% of patients reported a significant clinical improvement of symptoms after treatment in comparison with the previous year. No severe adverse reactions were observed in the study. Conclusion. Compliance to the treatment with AIT administered for 12 consecutive months is in general good. The use of CED is not associated with a greater compliance. AIT treatment was associated with a significant clinical improvement in >80% of patients with a good tolerability and safety profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3216395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32163952011-11-30 A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial Assessing Compliance, Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy to Treatment with Grass Allergy Tablets in 261 Patients with Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis Alesina, Roberta Milani, Massimo Pecora, Silvia J Allergy (Cairo) Research Article Background. Allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is considered a causal treatment of respiratory allergies. Compliance to the SLIT is an important aspect for a positive clinical outcome. Study Aim. To evaluate if compliance with grass Allergy Immunotherapy Tablet (AIT) can be increased by providing an electronic compliance device (CED) (Memozax; a tablet-container with a programmable daily acoustic alarm). Patients and Methods. 261 patients with grass allergy were enrolled and randomized (1 : 1) to 1-year treatment with AIT (Grazax) using a CED (group A; n = 122) or without (Group B, n = 139). Compliance was measured through tablet count at each visit. Results. The 12-month compliance, mean (SD), in group A was 83% (21) and 83% (24) in group B. A total of 81% of patients reported a significant clinical improvement of symptoms after treatment in comparison with the previous year. No severe adverse reactions were observed in the study. Conclusion. Compliance to the treatment with AIT administered for 12 consecutive months is in general good. The use of CED is not associated with a greater compliance. AIT treatment was associated with a significant clinical improvement in >80% of patients with a good tolerability and safety profile. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2011-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3216395/ /pubmed/22131999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/673502 Text en Copyright © 2012 Roberta Alesina et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alesina, Roberta
Milani, Massimo
Pecora, Silvia
A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial Assessing Compliance, Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy to Treatment with Grass Allergy Tablets in 261 Patients with Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis
title A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial Assessing Compliance, Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy to Treatment with Grass Allergy Tablets in 261 Patients with Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis
title_full A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial Assessing Compliance, Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy to Treatment with Grass Allergy Tablets in 261 Patients with Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis
title_fullStr A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial Assessing Compliance, Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy to Treatment with Grass Allergy Tablets in 261 Patients with Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis
title_full_unstemmed A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial Assessing Compliance, Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy to Treatment with Grass Allergy Tablets in 261 Patients with Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis
title_short A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial Assessing Compliance, Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy to Treatment with Grass Allergy Tablets in 261 Patients with Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis
title_sort multicenter, randomized, parallel-group trial assessing compliance, tolerability, safety, and efficacy to treatment with grass allergy tablets in 261 patients with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22131999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/673502
work_keys_str_mv AT alesinaroberta amulticenterrandomizedparallelgrouptrialassessingcompliancetolerabilitysafetyandefficacytotreatmentwithgrassallergytabletsin261patientswithgrasspollenrhinoconjunctivitis
AT milanimassimo amulticenterrandomizedparallelgrouptrialassessingcompliancetolerabilitysafetyandefficacytotreatmentwithgrassallergytabletsin261patientswithgrasspollenrhinoconjunctivitis
AT pecorasilvia amulticenterrandomizedparallelgrouptrialassessingcompliancetolerabilitysafetyandefficacytotreatmentwithgrassallergytabletsin261patientswithgrasspollenrhinoconjunctivitis
AT alesinaroberta multicenterrandomizedparallelgrouptrialassessingcompliancetolerabilitysafetyandefficacytotreatmentwithgrassallergytabletsin261patientswithgrasspollenrhinoconjunctivitis
AT milanimassimo multicenterrandomizedparallelgrouptrialassessingcompliancetolerabilitysafetyandefficacytotreatmentwithgrassallergytabletsin261patientswithgrasspollenrhinoconjunctivitis
AT pecorasilvia multicenterrandomizedparallelgrouptrialassessingcompliancetolerabilitysafetyandefficacytotreatmentwithgrassallergytabletsin261patientswithgrasspollenrhinoconjunctivitis