Cargando…

Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed

BACKGROUND: Fungal endophyte communities are often comprised of many species colonizing the same host. However, little is known about the causes of this diversity. On the one hand, the apparent coexistence of closely related species may be explained by the traditional niche differentiation hypothesi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ernst, Michael, Neubert, Karin, Mendgen, Kurt W, Wirsel, Stefan GR
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22032611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-242
_version_ 1782216514703720448
author Ernst, Michael
Neubert, Karin
Mendgen, Kurt W
Wirsel, Stefan GR
author_facet Ernst, Michael
Neubert, Karin
Mendgen, Kurt W
Wirsel, Stefan GR
author_sort Ernst, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fungal endophyte communities are often comprised of many species colonizing the same host. However, little is known about the causes of this diversity. On the one hand, the apparent coexistence of closely related species may be explained by the traditional niche differentiation hypothesis, which suggests that abiotic and/or biotic factors mediate partitioning. For endophytes, such factors are difficult to identify, and are therefore in most cases unknown. On the other hand, there is the neutral hypothesis, which suggests that stochastic factors may explain high species diversity. There is a need to investigate to what extent each of these hypotheses may apply to endophytes. RESULTS: The niche partitioning of two closely related fungal endophytes, Microdochium bolleyi and M. phragmitis, colonizing Phragmites australis, was investigated. The occurrences of each species were assessed using specific nested-PCR assays for 251 field samples of common reed from Lake Constance, Germany. These analyses revealed niche preferences for both fungi. From three niche factors assessed, i.e. host habitat, host organ and season, host habitat significantly differentiated the two species. M. bolleyi preferred dry habitats, whereas M. phragmitis prevailed in flooded habitats. In contrast, both species exhibited a significant preference for the same host organ, i.e. roots. Likewise the third factor, season, did not significantly distinguish the two species. Differences in carbon utilization and growth temperature could not conclusively explain the niches. The inclusion of three unrelated species of Ascomycota, which also colonize P. australis at the same locations, indicated spatio-temporal niche partitioning between all fungi. None of the species exhibited the same preferences for all three factors, i.e. host habitat, host organ, and time of the season. CONCLUSIONS: The fungal species colonizing common reed investigated in this study seem to exploit niche differences leading to a separation in space and time, which may allow for their coexistence on the same host. A purely neutral model is unlikely to explain the coexistence of closely related endophytes on common reed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3216463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32164632011-11-16 Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed Ernst, Michael Neubert, Karin Mendgen, Kurt W Wirsel, Stefan GR BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Fungal endophyte communities are often comprised of many species colonizing the same host. However, little is known about the causes of this diversity. On the one hand, the apparent coexistence of closely related species may be explained by the traditional niche differentiation hypothesis, which suggests that abiotic and/or biotic factors mediate partitioning. For endophytes, such factors are difficult to identify, and are therefore in most cases unknown. On the other hand, there is the neutral hypothesis, which suggests that stochastic factors may explain high species diversity. There is a need to investigate to what extent each of these hypotheses may apply to endophytes. RESULTS: The niche partitioning of two closely related fungal endophytes, Microdochium bolleyi and M. phragmitis, colonizing Phragmites australis, was investigated. The occurrences of each species were assessed using specific nested-PCR assays for 251 field samples of common reed from Lake Constance, Germany. These analyses revealed niche preferences for both fungi. From three niche factors assessed, i.e. host habitat, host organ and season, host habitat significantly differentiated the two species. M. bolleyi preferred dry habitats, whereas M. phragmitis prevailed in flooded habitats. In contrast, both species exhibited a significant preference for the same host organ, i.e. roots. Likewise the third factor, season, did not significantly distinguish the two species. Differences in carbon utilization and growth temperature could not conclusively explain the niches. The inclusion of three unrelated species of Ascomycota, which also colonize P. australis at the same locations, indicated spatio-temporal niche partitioning between all fungi. None of the species exhibited the same preferences for all three factors, i.e. host habitat, host organ, and time of the season. CONCLUSIONS: The fungal species colonizing common reed investigated in this study seem to exploit niche differences leading to a separation in space and time, which may allow for their coexistence on the same host. A purely neutral model is unlikely to explain the coexistence of closely related endophytes on common reed. BioMed Central 2011-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3216463/ /pubmed/22032611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-242 Text en Copyright ©2011 Ernst et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ernst, Michael
Neubert, Karin
Mendgen, Kurt W
Wirsel, Stefan GR
Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed
title Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed
title_full Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed
title_fullStr Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed
title_full_unstemmed Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed
title_short Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed
title_sort niche differentiation of two sympatric species of microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22032611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-242
work_keys_str_mv AT ernstmichael nichedifferentiationoftwosympatricspeciesofmicrodochiumcolonizingtherootsofcommonreed
AT neubertkarin nichedifferentiationoftwosympatricspeciesofmicrodochiumcolonizingtherootsofcommonreed
AT mendgenkurtw nichedifferentiationoftwosympatricspeciesofmicrodochiumcolonizingtherootsofcommonreed
AT wirselstefangr nichedifferentiationoftwosympatricspeciesofmicrodochiumcolonizingtherootsofcommonreed