Cargando…
Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts
The current protocols for blocking background staining in immunohistochemistry are based on conflicting reports. Background staining is thought to occur as a result of either non-specific antibody (Ab) binding to endogenous Fc receptors (FcRs) or a combination of ionic and hydrophobic interactions....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00028 |
_version_ | 1782216521234251776 |
---|---|
author | Buchwalow, Igor Samoilova, Vera Boecker, Werner Tiemann, Markus |
author_facet | Buchwalow, Igor Samoilova, Vera Boecker, Werner Tiemann, Markus |
author_sort | Buchwalow, Igor |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current protocols for blocking background staining in immunohistochemistry are based on conflicting reports. Background staining is thought to occur as a result of either non-specific antibody (Ab) binding to endogenous Fc receptors (FcRs) or a combination of ionic and hydrophobic interactions. In this study, cell and tissue samples were processed according to routine protocols either with or without a blocking step (goat serum or BSA). Surprisingly, no Abs in samples processed without a blocking step showed any propensity for non-specific binding leading to background staining, implying that endogenous FcRs do not retain their ability to bind the Fc portion of Abs after standard fixation. Likewise, we did not find any non-specific Ab binding ascribable to either ionic or hydrophobic interactions. We determined that traditionally used protein blocking steps are unnecessary in the immunostaining of routinely fixed cell and tissue samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3216515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32165152011-12-22 Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts Buchwalow, Igor Samoilova, Vera Boecker, Werner Tiemann, Markus Sci Rep Article The current protocols for blocking background staining in immunohistochemistry are based on conflicting reports. Background staining is thought to occur as a result of either non-specific antibody (Ab) binding to endogenous Fc receptors (FcRs) or a combination of ionic and hydrophobic interactions. In this study, cell and tissue samples were processed according to routine protocols either with or without a blocking step (goat serum or BSA). Surprisingly, no Abs in samples processed without a blocking step showed any propensity for non-specific binding leading to background staining, implying that endogenous FcRs do not retain their ability to bind the Fc portion of Abs after standard fixation. Likewise, we did not find any non-specific Ab binding ascribable to either ionic or hydrophobic interactions. We determined that traditionally used protein blocking steps are unnecessary in the immunostaining of routinely fixed cell and tissue samples. Nature Publishing Group 2011-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3216515/ /pubmed/22355547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00028 Text en Copyright © 2011, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Buchwalow, Igor Samoilova, Vera Boecker, Werner Tiemann, Markus Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts |
title | Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts |
title_full | Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts |
title_fullStr | Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts |
title_short | Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts |
title_sort | non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buchwalowigor nonspecificbindingofantibodiesinimmunohistochemistryfallaciesandfacts AT samoilovavera nonspecificbindingofantibodiesinimmunohistochemistryfallaciesandfacts AT boeckerwerner nonspecificbindingofantibodiesinimmunohistochemistryfallaciesandfacts AT tiemannmarkus nonspecificbindingofantibodiesinimmunohistochemistryfallaciesandfacts |