Cargando…

Chemoprophylaxis in Contacts of Patients with Cholera: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: There is a pressing need for effective measures to prevent the spread of cholera. Our systematic review assesses the effects of chemoprophylaxis in preventing cholera among exposed contacts. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We considered published and unpublished reports of studies up to July 201...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reveiz, Ludovic, Chapman, Evelina, Ramon-Pardo, Pilar, Koehlmoos, Tracey Perez, Cuervo, Luis Gabriel, Aldighieri, Sylvain, Chambliss, Amy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22102873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027060
_version_ 1782216567645274112
author Reveiz, Ludovic
Chapman, Evelina
Ramon-Pardo, Pilar
Koehlmoos, Tracey Perez
Cuervo, Luis Gabriel
Aldighieri, Sylvain
Chambliss, Amy
author_facet Reveiz, Ludovic
Chapman, Evelina
Ramon-Pardo, Pilar
Koehlmoos, Tracey Perez
Cuervo, Luis Gabriel
Aldighieri, Sylvain
Chambliss, Amy
author_sort Reveiz, Ludovic
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is a pressing need for effective measures to prevent the spread of cholera. Our systematic review assesses the effects of chemoprophylaxis in preventing cholera among exposed contacts. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We considered published and unpublished reports of studies up to July 2011. For this we searched: PubMed (1966 to July, 2011), Embase (1980 to July 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (6; 2011), LILACS (1982 to July, 2011), the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (July 2011) and references of identified publications. We included controlled clinical trials (randomized and non-randomized) in which chemoprophylaxis was used to prevent cholera among patient contacts. The main outcome measures were hospitalization and laboratory diagnosis of cholera in contacts for cholera patients. We assessed the risk of bias. We identified 2638 references and these included 2 randomized trials and 5 controlled trials that added up to a total of 4,154 participants. The risk of bias scored high for most trials. The combined results from two trials found that chemoprophylaxis reduced hospitalization of contacts during the follow-up period by 8–12 days (2826 participants; RR 0.54 95% CI 0.40–0.74;I(2) 0%). A meta-analysis of five trials found a significant reduction in disease among contacts with at least one positive sample who received chemoprophylaxis during the overall follow-up (range 4–15 days) (1,414 participants; RR 0.35 95% CI 0.18–0.66;I(2) 74%). A significant reduction in the number of positive samples was also found with chemoprophylaxis (3 CCT; 6,918 samples; RR 0.39 95% CI 0.29–0.51;I(2) 0%). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that chemoprophylaxis has a protective effect among household contacts of people with cholera but the results are based on studies with a high risk of bias. Hence, there is a need for adequate reliable research that allows balancing benefits and harms by evaluating the effects of chemoprophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3216950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32169502011-11-18 Chemoprophylaxis in Contacts of Patients with Cholera: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Reveiz, Ludovic Chapman, Evelina Ramon-Pardo, Pilar Koehlmoos, Tracey Perez Cuervo, Luis Gabriel Aldighieri, Sylvain Chambliss, Amy PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: There is a pressing need for effective measures to prevent the spread of cholera. Our systematic review assesses the effects of chemoprophylaxis in preventing cholera among exposed contacts. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We considered published and unpublished reports of studies up to July 2011. For this we searched: PubMed (1966 to July, 2011), Embase (1980 to July 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (6; 2011), LILACS (1982 to July, 2011), the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (July 2011) and references of identified publications. We included controlled clinical trials (randomized and non-randomized) in which chemoprophylaxis was used to prevent cholera among patient contacts. The main outcome measures were hospitalization and laboratory diagnosis of cholera in contacts for cholera patients. We assessed the risk of bias. We identified 2638 references and these included 2 randomized trials and 5 controlled trials that added up to a total of 4,154 participants. The risk of bias scored high for most trials. The combined results from two trials found that chemoprophylaxis reduced hospitalization of contacts during the follow-up period by 8–12 days (2826 participants; RR 0.54 95% CI 0.40–0.74;I(2) 0%). A meta-analysis of five trials found a significant reduction in disease among contacts with at least one positive sample who received chemoprophylaxis during the overall follow-up (range 4–15 days) (1,414 participants; RR 0.35 95% CI 0.18–0.66;I(2) 74%). A significant reduction in the number of positive samples was also found with chemoprophylaxis (3 CCT; 6,918 samples; RR 0.39 95% CI 0.29–0.51;I(2) 0%). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that chemoprophylaxis has a protective effect among household contacts of people with cholera but the results are based on studies with a high risk of bias. Hence, there is a need for adequate reliable research that allows balancing benefits and harms by evaluating the effects of chemoprophylaxis. Public Library of Science 2011-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3216950/ /pubmed/22102873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027060 Text en This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reveiz, Ludovic
Chapman, Evelina
Ramon-Pardo, Pilar
Koehlmoos, Tracey Perez
Cuervo, Luis Gabriel
Aldighieri, Sylvain
Chambliss, Amy
Chemoprophylaxis in Contacts of Patients with Cholera: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Chemoprophylaxis in Contacts of Patients with Cholera: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Chemoprophylaxis in Contacts of Patients with Cholera: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Chemoprophylaxis in Contacts of Patients with Cholera: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Chemoprophylaxis in Contacts of Patients with Cholera: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Chemoprophylaxis in Contacts of Patients with Cholera: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort chemoprophylaxis in contacts of patients with cholera: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22102873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027060
work_keys_str_mv AT reveizludovic chemoprophylaxisincontactsofpatientswithcholerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chapmanevelina chemoprophylaxisincontactsofpatientswithcholerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ramonpardopilar chemoprophylaxisincontactsofpatientswithcholerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT koehlmoostraceyperez chemoprophylaxisincontactsofpatientswithcholerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cuervoluisgabriel chemoprophylaxisincontactsofpatientswithcholerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aldighierisylvain chemoprophylaxisincontactsofpatientswithcholerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chamblissamy chemoprophylaxisincontactsofpatientswithcholerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis