Cargando…

Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care

BACKGROUND: Feedback is potentially effective in improving the quality of care. However, merely sending reports is no guarantee that performance data are used as input for systematic quality improvement (QI). Therefore, we developed a multifaceted intervention tailored to prospectively analyzed barr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Veer, Sabine N, de Vos, Maartje LG, Jager, Kitty J, van der Voort, Peter HJ, Peek, Niels, Westert, Gert P, Graafmans, Wilco C, de Keizer, Nicolette F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22024188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-119
_version_ 1782216629740896256
author van der Veer, Sabine N
de Vos, Maartje LG
Jager, Kitty J
van der Voort, Peter HJ
Peek, Niels
Westert, Gert P
Graafmans, Wilco C
de Keizer, Nicolette F
author_facet van der Veer, Sabine N
de Vos, Maartje LG
Jager, Kitty J
van der Voort, Peter HJ
Peek, Niels
Westert, Gert P
Graafmans, Wilco C
de Keizer, Nicolette F
author_sort van der Veer, Sabine N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Feedback is potentially effective in improving the quality of care. However, merely sending reports is no guarantee that performance data are used as input for systematic quality improvement (QI). Therefore, we developed a multifaceted intervention tailored to prospectively analyzed barriers to using indicators: the Information Feedback on Quality Indicators (InFoQI) program. This program aims to promote the use of performance indicator data as input for local systematic QI. We will conduct a study to assess the impact of the InFoQI program on patient outcome and organizational process measures of care, and to gain insight into barriers and success factors that affected the program's impact. The study will be executed in the context of intensive care. This paper presents the study's protocol. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial with intensive care units (ICUs) in the Netherlands. We will include ICUs that submit indicator data to the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) quality registry and that agree to allocate at least one intensivist and one ICU nurse for implementation of the intervention. Eligible ICUs (clusters) will be randomized to receive basic NICE registry feedback (control arm) or to participate in the InFoQI program (intervention arm). The InFoQI program consists of comprehensive feedback, establishing a local, multidisciplinary QI team, and educational outreach visits. The primary outcome measures will be length of ICU stay and the proportion of shifts with a bed occupancy rate above 80%. We will also conduct a process evaluation involving ICUs in the intervention arm to investigate their actual exposure to and experiences with the InFoQI program. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will inform those involved in providing ICU care on the feasibility of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention and its ability to accelerate systematic and local quality improvement. Although our study will be conducted within the domain of intensive care, we believe our conclusions will be generalizable to other settings that have a quality registry including an indicator set available. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN50542146
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3217909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32179092011-11-17 Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care van der Veer, Sabine N de Vos, Maartje LG Jager, Kitty J van der Voort, Peter HJ Peek, Niels Westert, Gert P Graafmans, Wilco C de Keizer, Nicolette F Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Feedback is potentially effective in improving the quality of care. However, merely sending reports is no guarantee that performance data are used as input for systematic quality improvement (QI). Therefore, we developed a multifaceted intervention tailored to prospectively analyzed barriers to using indicators: the Information Feedback on Quality Indicators (InFoQI) program. This program aims to promote the use of performance indicator data as input for local systematic QI. We will conduct a study to assess the impact of the InFoQI program on patient outcome and organizational process measures of care, and to gain insight into barriers and success factors that affected the program's impact. The study will be executed in the context of intensive care. This paper presents the study's protocol. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial with intensive care units (ICUs) in the Netherlands. We will include ICUs that submit indicator data to the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) quality registry and that agree to allocate at least one intensivist and one ICU nurse for implementation of the intervention. Eligible ICUs (clusters) will be randomized to receive basic NICE registry feedback (control arm) or to participate in the InFoQI program (intervention arm). The InFoQI program consists of comprehensive feedback, establishing a local, multidisciplinary QI team, and educational outreach visits. The primary outcome measures will be length of ICU stay and the proportion of shifts with a bed occupancy rate above 80%. We will also conduct a process evaluation involving ICUs in the intervention arm to investigate their actual exposure to and experiences with the InFoQI program. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will inform those involved in providing ICU care on the feasibility of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention and its ability to accelerate systematic and local quality improvement. Although our study will be conducted within the domain of intensive care, we believe our conclusions will be generalizable to other settings that have a quality registry including an indicator set available. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN50542146 BioMed Central 2011-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3217909/ /pubmed/22024188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-119 Text en Copyright ©2011 van der Veer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van der Veer, Sabine N
de Vos, Maartje LG
Jager, Kitty J
van der Voort, Peter HJ
Peek, Niels
Westert, Gert P
Graafmans, Wilco C
de Keizer, Nicolette F
Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title_full Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title_fullStr Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title_short Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title_sort evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22024188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-119
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderveersabinen evaluatingtheeffectivenessofatailoredmultifacetedperformancefeedbackinterventiontoimprovethequalityofcareprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT devosmaartjelg evaluatingtheeffectivenessofatailoredmultifacetedperformancefeedbackinterventiontoimprovethequalityofcareprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT jagerkittyj evaluatingtheeffectivenessofatailoredmultifacetedperformancefeedbackinterventiontoimprovethequalityofcareprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT vandervoortpeterhj evaluatingtheeffectivenessofatailoredmultifacetedperformancefeedbackinterventiontoimprovethequalityofcareprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT peekniels evaluatingtheeffectivenessofatailoredmultifacetedperformancefeedbackinterventiontoimprovethequalityofcareprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT westertgertp evaluatingtheeffectivenessofatailoredmultifacetedperformancefeedbackinterventiontoimprovethequalityofcareprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT graafmanswilcoc evaluatingtheeffectivenessofatailoredmultifacetedperformancefeedbackinterventiontoimprovethequalityofcareprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT dekeizernicolettef evaluatingtheeffectivenessofatailoredmultifacetedperformancefeedbackinterventiontoimprovethequalityofcareprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare