Cargando…

Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in advanced heart failure (HF). However, an important subset does not derive a significant benefit. Despite an established predictive role in HF, the significance of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in predicting clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alpendurada, Francisco, Guha, Kaushik, Sharma, Rakesh, Ismail, Tevfik F, Clifford, Amy, Banya, Winston, Mohiaddin, Raad H, Pennell, Dudley J, Cowie, Martin R, McDonagh, Theresa, Prasad, Sanjay K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22040270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-68
_version_ 1782216630636380160
author Alpendurada, Francisco
Guha, Kaushik
Sharma, Rakesh
Ismail, Tevfik F
Clifford, Amy
Banya, Winston
Mohiaddin, Raad H
Pennell, Dudley J
Cowie, Martin R
McDonagh, Theresa
Prasad, Sanjay K
author_facet Alpendurada, Francisco
Guha, Kaushik
Sharma, Rakesh
Ismail, Tevfik F
Clifford, Amy
Banya, Winston
Mohiaddin, Raad H
Pennell, Dudley J
Cowie, Martin R
McDonagh, Theresa
Prasad, Sanjay K
author_sort Alpendurada, Francisco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in advanced heart failure (HF). However, an important subset does not derive a significant benefit. Despite an established predictive role in HF, the significance of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in predicting clinical benefit from CRT remains unclear. We investigated the role of RV function, assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in predicting response to and major adverse clinical events in HF patients undergoing CRT. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients were evaluated with CMR prior to CRT implantation in a tertiary cardiac centre. The primary end-point was a composite of death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for a major cardiovascular event. The secondary end-point was response to therapy, defined as improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 5% on echocardiography at one year. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (30%) met the primary end-point over a median follow-up period of 26 months, and 27 out of 56 patients (48%) were considered responders to CRT. On time-to-event analysis, only atrial fibrillation (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.02-6.84, p = 0.047) and RV dysfunction, either by a reduced right ventricular ejection fraction-RVEF (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, p = 0.006) or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion-TAPSE (HR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.80-0.96, p = 0.006), were significant predictors of adverse events. On logistic regression analysis, preserved RVEF (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, p = 0.01) and myocardial scar burden (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.96, p = 0.004) were the sole independent predictors of response to CRT. Patients with marked RV dysfunction (RVEF < 30%) had a particularly low response rate (18.2%) to CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular function is an important predictor of both response to CRT and long-term clinical outcome. Routine assessment of the right ventricle should be considered in the evaluation of patients for CRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3217913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32179132011-11-17 Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy Alpendurada, Francisco Guha, Kaushik Sharma, Rakesh Ismail, Tevfik F Clifford, Amy Banya, Winston Mohiaddin, Raad H Pennell, Dudley J Cowie, Martin R McDonagh, Theresa Prasad, Sanjay K J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in advanced heart failure (HF). However, an important subset does not derive a significant benefit. Despite an established predictive role in HF, the significance of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in predicting clinical benefit from CRT remains unclear. We investigated the role of RV function, assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in predicting response to and major adverse clinical events in HF patients undergoing CRT. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients were evaluated with CMR prior to CRT implantation in a tertiary cardiac centre. The primary end-point was a composite of death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for a major cardiovascular event. The secondary end-point was response to therapy, defined as improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 5% on echocardiography at one year. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (30%) met the primary end-point over a median follow-up period of 26 months, and 27 out of 56 patients (48%) were considered responders to CRT. On time-to-event analysis, only atrial fibrillation (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.02-6.84, p = 0.047) and RV dysfunction, either by a reduced right ventricular ejection fraction-RVEF (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, p = 0.006) or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion-TAPSE (HR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.80-0.96, p = 0.006), were significant predictors of adverse events. On logistic regression analysis, preserved RVEF (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, p = 0.01) and myocardial scar burden (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.96, p = 0.004) were the sole independent predictors of response to CRT. Patients with marked RV dysfunction (RVEF < 30%) had a particularly low response rate (18.2%) to CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular function is an important predictor of both response to CRT and long-term clinical outcome. Routine assessment of the right ventricle should be considered in the evaluation of patients for CRT. BioMed Central 2011-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3217913/ /pubmed/22040270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-68 Text en Copyright ©2011 Alpendurada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Alpendurada, Francisco
Guha, Kaushik
Sharma, Rakesh
Ismail, Tevfik F
Clifford, Amy
Banya, Winston
Mohiaddin, Raad H
Pennell, Dudley J
Cowie, Martin R
McDonagh, Theresa
Prasad, Sanjay K
Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_fullStr Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full_unstemmed Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_short Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_sort right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22040270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-68
work_keys_str_mv AT alpenduradafrancisco rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT guhakaushik rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT sharmarakesh rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT ismailtevfikf rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT cliffordamy rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT banyawinston rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT mohiaddinraadh rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT pennelldudleyj rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT cowiemartinr rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT mcdonaghtheresa rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT prasadsanjayk rightventriculardysfunctionisapredictorofnonresponseandclinicaloutcomefollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy