Cargando…

Impact of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Smoking Quit Attempts and Prevalence

OBJECTIVES: In Scotland, legislation was implemented in March 2006 prohibiting smoking in all wholly or partially enclosed public spaces. We investigated the impact on attempts to quit smoking and smoking prevalence. METHODS: We performed time series models using Box-Jenkins autoregressive integrate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mackay, Daniel F., Haw, Sally, Pell, Jill P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026188
_version_ 1782216632185126912
author Mackay, Daniel F.
Haw, Sally
Pell, Jill P.
author_facet Mackay, Daniel F.
Haw, Sally
Pell, Jill P.
author_sort Mackay, Daniel F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In Scotland, legislation was implemented in March 2006 prohibiting smoking in all wholly or partially enclosed public spaces. We investigated the impact on attempts to quit smoking and smoking prevalence. METHODS: We performed time series models using Box-Jenkins autoregressive integrated moving averages (ARIMA) on monthly data on the gross ingredient cost of all nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) prescribed in Scotland in 2003–2009, and quarterly data on self-reported smoking prevalence between January 1999 and September 2010 from the Scottish Household Survey. RESULTS: NRT prescription costs were significantly higher than expected over the three months prior to implementation of the legislation. Prescription costs peaked at £1.3 million in March 2006; £292,005.9 (95% CI £260,402.3, £323,609, p<0.001) higher than the monthly norm. Following implementation of the legislation, costs fell exponentially by around 26% per month (95% CI 17%, 35%, p<0.001). Twelve months following implementation, the costs were not significantly different to monthly norms. Smoking prevalence fell by 8.0% overall, from 31.3% in January 1999 to 23.7% in July–September 2010. In the quarter prior to implementation of the legislation, smoking prevalence fell by 1.7% (95% CI 2.4%, 1.0%, p<0.001) more than expected from the underlying trend. CONCLUSIONS: Quit attempts increased in the three months leading up to Scotland's smoke-free legislation, resulting in a fall in smoking prevalence. However, neither has been sustained suggesting the need for additional tobacco control measures and ongoing support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3217920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32179202011-11-21 Impact of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Smoking Quit Attempts and Prevalence Mackay, Daniel F. Haw, Sally Pell, Jill P. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: In Scotland, legislation was implemented in March 2006 prohibiting smoking in all wholly or partially enclosed public spaces. We investigated the impact on attempts to quit smoking and smoking prevalence. METHODS: We performed time series models using Box-Jenkins autoregressive integrated moving averages (ARIMA) on monthly data on the gross ingredient cost of all nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) prescribed in Scotland in 2003–2009, and quarterly data on self-reported smoking prevalence between January 1999 and September 2010 from the Scottish Household Survey. RESULTS: NRT prescription costs were significantly higher than expected over the three months prior to implementation of the legislation. Prescription costs peaked at £1.3 million in March 2006; £292,005.9 (95% CI £260,402.3, £323,609, p<0.001) higher than the monthly norm. Following implementation of the legislation, costs fell exponentially by around 26% per month (95% CI 17%, 35%, p<0.001). Twelve months following implementation, the costs were not significantly different to monthly norms. Smoking prevalence fell by 8.0% overall, from 31.3% in January 1999 to 23.7% in July–September 2010. In the quarter prior to implementation of the legislation, smoking prevalence fell by 1.7% (95% CI 2.4%, 1.0%, p<0.001) more than expected from the underlying trend. CONCLUSIONS: Quit attempts increased in the three months leading up to Scotland's smoke-free legislation, resulting in a fall in smoking prevalence. However, neither has been sustained suggesting the need for additional tobacco control measures and ongoing support. Public Library of Science 2011-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3217920/ /pubmed/22110585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026188 Text en Mackay et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mackay, Daniel F.
Haw, Sally
Pell, Jill P.
Impact of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Smoking Quit Attempts and Prevalence
title Impact of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Smoking Quit Attempts and Prevalence
title_full Impact of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Smoking Quit Attempts and Prevalence
title_fullStr Impact of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Smoking Quit Attempts and Prevalence
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Smoking Quit Attempts and Prevalence
title_short Impact of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Smoking Quit Attempts and Prevalence
title_sort impact of scottish smoke-free legislation on smoking quit attempts and prevalence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026188
work_keys_str_mv AT mackaydanielf impactofscottishsmokefreelegislationonsmokingquitattemptsandprevalence
AT hawsally impactofscottishsmokefreelegislationonsmokingquitattemptsandprevalence
AT pelljillp impactofscottishsmokefreelegislationonsmokingquitattemptsandprevalence