Cargando…

Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale

BACKGROUND: The use of patient reported outcome measures within cost-effectiveness analysis has become commonplace. However, specific measures are required that produce values, referred to as 'utilities', that are capable of generating quality adjusted life years. One such measure - the EQ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dixon, Simon, Poole, Chris D, Odeyemi, Isaac, Retsa, Peny, Chambers, Colette, Currie, Craig J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22054241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-96
_version_ 1782216634732118016
author Dixon, Simon
Poole, Chris D
Odeyemi, Isaac
Retsa, Peny
Chambers, Colette
Currie, Craig J
author_facet Dixon, Simon
Poole, Chris D
Odeyemi, Isaac
Retsa, Peny
Chambers, Colette
Currie, Craig J
author_sort Dixon, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of patient reported outcome measures within cost-effectiveness analysis has become commonplace. However, specific measures are required that produce values, referred to as 'utilities', that are capable of generating quality adjusted life years. One such measure - the EQ-5D - has come under criticism due to the inherent limitations of its three-level response scales. In evaluations of chronic pain, the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) which has eleven levels is routinely used which has a greater measurement range, but which can not be used in cost-effetiveness analyses. This study derived utility values for a series of EQ-5D health states that replace the pain dimensions with the NPRS, thereby allowing a potentially greater range of pain intensities to be captured and included in economic analyses. METHODS: Interviews were undertaken with 100 member of the general population. Health state valuations were elicited using the time trade-off approach with a ten year time horizon. Additionally, respondents were asked where the EQ-5D response scale descriptors of moderate and extreme pain lay on the 11-point NPRS scale. RESULTS: 625 valuations were undertaken across the study sample with the crude mean health state utilities showing a negative non-linear relationship with respect to increasing pain intensity. Relative to a NPRS of zero (NPRS0), the successive pain levels (NPRS1-10) had mean decrements in utility of 0.034, 0.043, 0.061, 0.121, 0.144, 0.252, 0.404, 0.575, 0.771 and 0.793, respectively. When respondents were asked to mark on the NPRS scale the EQ-5D pain descriptors of moderate and extreme pain, the median responses were '4' and '8', respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the potential floor effect of the EQ-5D with respect to pain and provide estimates of health reduction associated with pain intensity described by the NPRS. These estimates are in excess of the decrements produced by an application of the EQ-5D scoring tariff for both the United States and the United Kingdom.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3217931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32179312011-11-17 Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale Dixon, Simon Poole, Chris D Odeyemi, Isaac Retsa, Peny Chambers, Colette Currie, Craig J Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The use of patient reported outcome measures within cost-effectiveness analysis has become commonplace. However, specific measures are required that produce values, referred to as 'utilities', that are capable of generating quality adjusted life years. One such measure - the EQ-5D - has come under criticism due to the inherent limitations of its three-level response scales. In evaluations of chronic pain, the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) which has eleven levels is routinely used which has a greater measurement range, but which can not be used in cost-effetiveness analyses. This study derived utility values for a series of EQ-5D health states that replace the pain dimensions with the NPRS, thereby allowing a potentially greater range of pain intensities to be captured and included in economic analyses. METHODS: Interviews were undertaken with 100 member of the general population. Health state valuations were elicited using the time trade-off approach with a ten year time horizon. Additionally, respondents were asked where the EQ-5D response scale descriptors of moderate and extreme pain lay on the 11-point NPRS scale. RESULTS: 625 valuations were undertaken across the study sample with the crude mean health state utilities showing a negative non-linear relationship with respect to increasing pain intensity. Relative to a NPRS of zero (NPRS0), the successive pain levels (NPRS1-10) had mean decrements in utility of 0.034, 0.043, 0.061, 0.121, 0.144, 0.252, 0.404, 0.575, 0.771 and 0.793, respectively. When respondents were asked to mark on the NPRS scale the EQ-5D pain descriptors of moderate and extreme pain, the median responses were '4' and '8', respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the potential floor effect of the EQ-5D with respect to pain and provide estimates of health reduction associated with pain intensity described by the NPRS. These estimates are in excess of the decrements produced by an application of the EQ-5D scoring tariff for both the United States and the United Kingdom. BioMed Central 2011-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3217931/ /pubmed/22054241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-96 Text en Copyright ©2011 Dixon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Dixon, Simon
Poole, Chris D
Odeyemi, Isaac
Retsa, Peny
Chambers, Colette
Currie, Craig J
Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale
title Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale
title_full Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale
title_fullStr Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale
title_full_unstemmed Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale
title_short Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale
title_sort deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22054241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-96
work_keys_str_mv AT dixonsimon derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale
AT poolechrisd derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale
AT odeyemiisaac derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale
AT retsapeny derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale
AT chamberscolette derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale
AT curriecraigj derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale