Cargando…
Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale
BACKGROUND: The use of patient reported outcome measures within cost-effectiveness analysis has become commonplace. However, specific measures are required that produce values, referred to as 'utilities', that are capable of generating quality adjusted life years. One such measure - the EQ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22054241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-96 |
_version_ | 1782216634732118016 |
---|---|
author | Dixon, Simon Poole, Chris D Odeyemi, Isaac Retsa, Peny Chambers, Colette Currie, Craig J |
author_facet | Dixon, Simon Poole, Chris D Odeyemi, Isaac Retsa, Peny Chambers, Colette Currie, Craig J |
author_sort | Dixon, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of patient reported outcome measures within cost-effectiveness analysis has become commonplace. However, specific measures are required that produce values, referred to as 'utilities', that are capable of generating quality adjusted life years. One such measure - the EQ-5D - has come under criticism due to the inherent limitations of its three-level response scales. In evaluations of chronic pain, the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) which has eleven levels is routinely used which has a greater measurement range, but which can not be used in cost-effetiveness analyses. This study derived utility values for a series of EQ-5D health states that replace the pain dimensions with the NPRS, thereby allowing a potentially greater range of pain intensities to be captured and included in economic analyses. METHODS: Interviews were undertaken with 100 member of the general population. Health state valuations were elicited using the time trade-off approach with a ten year time horizon. Additionally, respondents were asked where the EQ-5D response scale descriptors of moderate and extreme pain lay on the 11-point NPRS scale. RESULTS: 625 valuations were undertaken across the study sample with the crude mean health state utilities showing a negative non-linear relationship with respect to increasing pain intensity. Relative to a NPRS of zero (NPRS0), the successive pain levels (NPRS1-10) had mean decrements in utility of 0.034, 0.043, 0.061, 0.121, 0.144, 0.252, 0.404, 0.575, 0.771 and 0.793, respectively. When respondents were asked to mark on the NPRS scale the EQ-5D pain descriptors of moderate and extreme pain, the median responses were '4' and '8', respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the potential floor effect of the EQ-5D with respect to pain and provide estimates of health reduction associated with pain intensity described by the NPRS. These estimates are in excess of the decrements produced by an application of the EQ-5D scoring tariff for both the United States and the United Kingdom. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3217931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32179312011-11-17 Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale Dixon, Simon Poole, Chris D Odeyemi, Isaac Retsa, Peny Chambers, Colette Currie, Craig J Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The use of patient reported outcome measures within cost-effectiveness analysis has become commonplace. However, specific measures are required that produce values, referred to as 'utilities', that are capable of generating quality adjusted life years. One such measure - the EQ-5D - has come under criticism due to the inherent limitations of its three-level response scales. In evaluations of chronic pain, the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) which has eleven levels is routinely used which has a greater measurement range, but which can not be used in cost-effetiveness analyses. This study derived utility values for a series of EQ-5D health states that replace the pain dimensions with the NPRS, thereby allowing a potentially greater range of pain intensities to be captured and included in economic analyses. METHODS: Interviews were undertaken with 100 member of the general population. Health state valuations were elicited using the time trade-off approach with a ten year time horizon. Additionally, respondents were asked where the EQ-5D response scale descriptors of moderate and extreme pain lay on the 11-point NPRS scale. RESULTS: 625 valuations were undertaken across the study sample with the crude mean health state utilities showing a negative non-linear relationship with respect to increasing pain intensity. Relative to a NPRS of zero (NPRS0), the successive pain levels (NPRS1-10) had mean decrements in utility of 0.034, 0.043, 0.061, 0.121, 0.144, 0.252, 0.404, 0.575, 0.771 and 0.793, respectively. When respondents were asked to mark on the NPRS scale the EQ-5D pain descriptors of moderate and extreme pain, the median responses were '4' and '8', respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the potential floor effect of the EQ-5D with respect to pain and provide estimates of health reduction associated with pain intensity described by the NPRS. These estimates are in excess of the decrements produced by an application of the EQ-5D scoring tariff for both the United States and the United Kingdom. BioMed Central 2011-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3217931/ /pubmed/22054241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-96 Text en Copyright ©2011 Dixon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Dixon, Simon Poole, Chris D Odeyemi, Isaac Retsa, Peny Chambers, Colette Currie, Craig J Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale |
title | Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale |
title_full | Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale |
title_fullStr | Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale |
title_short | Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale |
title_sort | deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22054241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-96 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dixonsimon derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale AT poolechrisd derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale AT odeyemiisaac derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale AT retsapeny derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale AT chamberscolette derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale AT curriecraigj derivinghealthstateutilitiesforthenumericalpainratingscale |