Cargando…

Comparison and Avoidance of Toxicity of Penetrating Cryoprotectants

The objective of this study was to elucidate the toxicity of widely used penetrating cryoprotective agents (CPAs) to mammalian oocytes. To this end, mouse metaphase II (M II) oocytes were exposed to 1.5 M solutions of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol (EG), or propanediol (PROH) prepared in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szurek, Edyta A., Eroglu, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027604
_version_ 1782216649713123328
author Szurek, Edyta A.
Eroglu, Ali
author_facet Szurek, Edyta A.
Eroglu, Ali
author_sort Szurek, Edyta A.
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to elucidate the toxicity of widely used penetrating cryoprotective agents (CPAs) to mammalian oocytes. To this end, mouse metaphase II (M II) oocytes were exposed to 1.5 M solutions of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol (EG), or propanediol (PROH) prepared in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 10% fetal bovine serum. To address the time- and temperature-dependence of the CPA toxicity, M II oocytes were exposed to the aforementioned CPAs at room temperature (RT, ∼23°C) and 37°C for 15 or 30 minutes. Subsequently, the toxicity of each CPA was evaluated by examining post-exposure survival, fertilization, embryonic development, chromosomal abnormalities, and parthenogenetic activation of treated oocytes. Untreated oocytes served as controls. Exposure of MII oocytes to 1.5 M DMSO or 1.5 M EG at RT for 15 min did not adversely affect any of the evaluated criteria. In contrast, 1.5 M PROH induced a significant increase in oocyte degeneration (54.2%) and parthenogenetic activation (16%) under same conditions. When the CPA exposure was performed at 37°C, the toxic effect of PROH further increased, resulting in lower survival (15%) and no fertilization while the toxicity of DMSO and EG was still insignificant. Nevertheless, it was possible to completely avoid the toxicity of PROH by decreasing its concentration to 0.75 M and combining it with 0.75 M DMSO to bring the total CPA concentration to a cryoprotective level. Moreover, combining lower concentrations (i.e., 0.75 M) of PROH and DMSO significantly improved the cryosurvival of MII oocytes compared to the equivalent concentration of DMSO alone. Taken together, our results suggest that from the perspective of CPA toxicity, DMSO and EG are safer to use in slow cooling protocols while a lower concentration of PROH can be combined with another CPA to avoid its toxicity and to improve the cryosurvival as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3217997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32179972011-11-21 Comparison and Avoidance of Toxicity of Penetrating Cryoprotectants Szurek, Edyta A. Eroglu, Ali PLoS One Research Article The objective of this study was to elucidate the toxicity of widely used penetrating cryoprotective agents (CPAs) to mammalian oocytes. To this end, mouse metaphase II (M II) oocytes were exposed to 1.5 M solutions of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol (EG), or propanediol (PROH) prepared in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 10% fetal bovine serum. To address the time- and temperature-dependence of the CPA toxicity, M II oocytes were exposed to the aforementioned CPAs at room temperature (RT, ∼23°C) and 37°C for 15 or 30 minutes. Subsequently, the toxicity of each CPA was evaluated by examining post-exposure survival, fertilization, embryonic development, chromosomal abnormalities, and parthenogenetic activation of treated oocytes. Untreated oocytes served as controls. Exposure of MII oocytes to 1.5 M DMSO or 1.5 M EG at RT for 15 min did not adversely affect any of the evaluated criteria. In contrast, 1.5 M PROH induced a significant increase in oocyte degeneration (54.2%) and parthenogenetic activation (16%) under same conditions. When the CPA exposure was performed at 37°C, the toxic effect of PROH further increased, resulting in lower survival (15%) and no fertilization while the toxicity of DMSO and EG was still insignificant. Nevertheless, it was possible to completely avoid the toxicity of PROH by decreasing its concentration to 0.75 M and combining it with 0.75 M DMSO to bring the total CPA concentration to a cryoprotective level. Moreover, combining lower concentrations (i.e., 0.75 M) of PROH and DMSO significantly improved the cryosurvival of MII oocytes compared to the equivalent concentration of DMSO alone. Taken together, our results suggest that from the perspective of CPA toxicity, DMSO and EG are safer to use in slow cooling protocols while a lower concentration of PROH can be combined with another CPA to avoid its toxicity and to improve the cryosurvival as well. Public Library of Science 2011-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3217997/ /pubmed/22110685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027604 Text en Szurek, Eroglu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Szurek, Edyta A.
Eroglu, Ali
Comparison and Avoidance of Toxicity of Penetrating Cryoprotectants
title Comparison and Avoidance of Toxicity of Penetrating Cryoprotectants
title_full Comparison and Avoidance of Toxicity of Penetrating Cryoprotectants
title_fullStr Comparison and Avoidance of Toxicity of Penetrating Cryoprotectants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and Avoidance of Toxicity of Penetrating Cryoprotectants
title_short Comparison and Avoidance of Toxicity of Penetrating Cryoprotectants
title_sort comparison and avoidance of toxicity of penetrating cryoprotectants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027604
work_keys_str_mv AT szurekedytaa comparisonandavoidanceoftoxicityofpenetratingcryoprotectants
AT erogluali comparisonandavoidanceoftoxicityofpenetratingcryoprotectants