Cargando…

Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Pay-for-performance (P4P) is increasingly implemented in the healthcare system to encourage improvements in healthcare quality. P4P is a payment model that rewards healthcare providers for meeting pre-established targets for delivery of healthcare services by financial incentives. Based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Bruin, Simone R, Baan, Caroline A, Struijs, Jeroen N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3218039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-272
_version_ 1782216659380994048
author de Bruin, Simone R
Baan, Caroline A
Struijs, Jeroen N
author_facet de Bruin, Simone R
Baan, Caroline A
Struijs, Jeroen N
author_sort de Bruin, Simone R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pay-for-performance (P4P) is increasingly implemented in the healthcare system to encourage improvements in healthcare quality. P4P is a payment model that rewards healthcare providers for meeting pre-established targets for delivery of healthcare services by financial incentives. Based on their performance, healthcare providers receive either additional or reduced payment. Currently, little is known about P4P schemes intending to improve delivery of chronic care through disease management. The objectives of this paper are therefore to provide an overview of P4P schemes used to stimulate delivery of chronic care through disease management and to provide insight into their effects on healthcare quality and costs. METHODS: A systematic PubMed search was performed for English language papers published between 2000 and 2010 describing P4P schemes related to the implementation of disease management. Wagner's chronic care model was used to make disease management operational. RESULTS: Eight P4P schemes were identified, introduced in the USA (n = 6), Germany (n = 1), and Australia (n = 1). Five P4P schemes were part of a larger scheme of interventions to improve quality of care, whereas three P4P schemes were solely implemented. Most financial incentives were rewards, selective, and granted on the basis of absolute performance. More variation was found in incented entities and the basis for providing incentives. Information about motivation, certainty, size, frequency, and duration of the financial incentives was generally limited. Five studies were identified that evaluated the effects of P4P on healthcare quality. Most studies showed positive effects of P4P on healthcare quality. No studies were found that evaluated the effects of P4P on healthcare costs. CONCLUSION: The number of P4P schemes to encourage disease management is limited. Hardly any information is available about the effects of such schemes on healthcare quality and costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3218039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32180392011-11-17 Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature de Bruin, Simone R Baan, Caroline A Struijs, Jeroen N BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Pay-for-performance (P4P) is increasingly implemented in the healthcare system to encourage improvements in healthcare quality. P4P is a payment model that rewards healthcare providers for meeting pre-established targets for delivery of healthcare services by financial incentives. Based on their performance, healthcare providers receive either additional or reduced payment. Currently, little is known about P4P schemes intending to improve delivery of chronic care through disease management. The objectives of this paper are therefore to provide an overview of P4P schemes used to stimulate delivery of chronic care through disease management and to provide insight into their effects on healthcare quality and costs. METHODS: A systematic PubMed search was performed for English language papers published between 2000 and 2010 describing P4P schemes related to the implementation of disease management. Wagner's chronic care model was used to make disease management operational. RESULTS: Eight P4P schemes were identified, introduced in the USA (n = 6), Germany (n = 1), and Australia (n = 1). Five P4P schemes were part of a larger scheme of interventions to improve quality of care, whereas three P4P schemes were solely implemented. Most financial incentives were rewards, selective, and granted on the basis of absolute performance. More variation was found in incented entities and the basis for providing incentives. Information about motivation, certainty, size, frequency, and duration of the financial incentives was generally limited. Five studies were identified that evaluated the effects of P4P on healthcare quality. Most studies showed positive effects of P4P on healthcare quality. No studies were found that evaluated the effects of P4P on healthcare costs. CONCLUSION: The number of P4P schemes to encourage disease management is limited. Hardly any information is available about the effects of such schemes on healthcare quality and costs. BioMed Central 2011-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3218039/ /pubmed/21999234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-272 Text en Copyright ©2011 de Bruin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Bruin, Simone R
Baan, Caroline A
Struijs, Jeroen N
Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature
title Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3218039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-272
work_keys_str_mv AT debruinsimoner payforperformanceindiseasemanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT baancarolinea payforperformanceindiseasemanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT struijsjeroenn payforperformanceindiseasemanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature