Cargando…

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE: Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) compared with N stage. The purpose of this study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Jin Yong, Hong, Kwan Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3218130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22102976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.252
_version_ 1782216674427011072
author Shin, Jin Yong
Hong, Kwan Hee
author_facet Shin, Jin Yong
Hong, Kwan Hee
author_sort Shin, Jin Yong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) compared with N stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the LNR in the era of the 7th edition of the TNM classification. METHODS: We included 190 patients who underwent a curative resection for rectal cancer with nodal metastasis. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of statistically calculated cut-off values as 0.21, 0.32, and 0.61. RESULTS: The LNR was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS; P = 0.008) and for systemic recurrence-free survival (SRFS; P = 0.002). However, the LNR was not a predictive factor for local recurrence. When the N stage of the sixth TNM staging system was separately analyzed as a covariate, the LNR was also found to be a predictive factor for both OS and SRFS (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively). A LNR value of 0.21 offered the best cut off to separate patients into two prognostic groups. CONCLUSION: The defined cut-off values of the LNR were an independent risk factor for OS and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, irrespective of the sixth or the seventh version of the TNM classification, and the LNR should be considered as a prognostic variable in any future staging system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3218130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32181302011-11-18 Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer Shin, Jin Yong Hong, Kwan Hee J Korean Soc Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) compared with N stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the LNR in the era of the 7th edition of the TNM classification. METHODS: We included 190 patients who underwent a curative resection for rectal cancer with nodal metastasis. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of statistically calculated cut-off values as 0.21, 0.32, and 0.61. RESULTS: The LNR was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS; P = 0.008) and for systemic recurrence-free survival (SRFS; P = 0.002). However, the LNR was not a predictive factor for local recurrence. When the N stage of the sixth TNM staging system was separately analyzed as a covariate, the LNR was also found to be a predictive factor for both OS and SRFS (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively). A LNR value of 0.21 offered the best cut off to separate patients into two prognostic groups. CONCLUSION: The defined cut-off values of the LNR were an independent risk factor for OS and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, irrespective of the sixth or the seventh version of the TNM classification, and the LNR should be considered as a prognostic variable in any future staging system. The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2011-10 2011-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3218130/ /pubmed/22102976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.252 Text en © 2011 The Korean Society of Coloproctology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shin, Jin Yong
Hong, Kwan Hee
Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer
title Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer
title_full Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer
title_short Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer
title_sort prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in stage iii rectal cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3218130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22102976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.252
work_keys_str_mv AT shinjinyong prognosticsignificanceoflymphnoderatioinstageiiirectalcancer
AT hongkwanhee prognosticsignificanceoflymphnoderatioinstageiiirectalcancer