Cargando…
Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer
PURPOSE: Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) compared with N stage. The purpose of this study w...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Coloproctology
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3218130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22102976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.252 |
_version_ | 1782216674427011072 |
---|---|
author | Shin, Jin Yong Hong, Kwan Hee |
author_facet | Shin, Jin Yong Hong, Kwan Hee |
author_sort | Shin, Jin Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) compared with N stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the LNR in the era of the 7th edition of the TNM classification. METHODS: We included 190 patients who underwent a curative resection for rectal cancer with nodal metastasis. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of statistically calculated cut-off values as 0.21, 0.32, and 0.61. RESULTS: The LNR was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS; P = 0.008) and for systemic recurrence-free survival (SRFS; P = 0.002). However, the LNR was not a predictive factor for local recurrence. When the N stage of the sixth TNM staging system was separately analyzed as a covariate, the LNR was also found to be a predictive factor for both OS and SRFS (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively). A LNR value of 0.21 offered the best cut off to separate patients into two prognostic groups. CONCLUSION: The defined cut-off values of the LNR were an independent risk factor for OS and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, irrespective of the sixth or the seventh version of the TNM classification, and the LNR should be considered as a prognostic variable in any future staging system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3218130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Coloproctology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32181302011-11-18 Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer Shin, Jin Yong Hong, Kwan Hee J Korean Soc Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) compared with N stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the LNR in the era of the 7th edition of the TNM classification. METHODS: We included 190 patients who underwent a curative resection for rectal cancer with nodal metastasis. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of statistically calculated cut-off values as 0.21, 0.32, and 0.61. RESULTS: The LNR was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS; P = 0.008) and for systemic recurrence-free survival (SRFS; P = 0.002). However, the LNR was not a predictive factor for local recurrence. When the N stage of the sixth TNM staging system was separately analyzed as a covariate, the LNR was also found to be a predictive factor for both OS and SRFS (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively). A LNR value of 0.21 offered the best cut off to separate patients into two prognostic groups. CONCLUSION: The defined cut-off values of the LNR were an independent risk factor for OS and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, irrespective of the sixth or the seventh version of the TNM classification, and the LNR should be considered as a prognostic variable in any future staging system. The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2011-10 2011-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3218130/ /pubmed/22102976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.252 Text en © 2011 The Korean Society of Coloproctology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shin, Jin Yong Hong, Kwan Hee Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer |
title | Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer |
title_full | Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer |
title_short | Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer |
title_sort | prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in stage iii rectal cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3218130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22102976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinjinyong prognosticsignificanceoflymphnoderatioinstageiiirectalcancer AT hongkwanhee prognosticsignificanceoflymphnoderatioinstageiiirectalcancer |