Cargando…

Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the early treatment of sepsis: results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study: the INTERSEPT Study

INTRODUCTION: Enteral nutrition (EN) with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)/γ-linolenic acid (GLA) is recommended for mechanically ventilated patients with severe lung injury. EPA/GLA has anti-inflammatory benefits, as evidenced by its association with reduction in pulmonary inflammation, improvement in o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro, Martins, Laércia Ferreira, de Lima, Samya Maria, Isola, Alexandre Marini, Toledo, Diogo, Rezende, Ederlon, Maia, Marcelo, Magnan, Gisele Brocco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21658240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10267
_version_ 1782216779603378176
author Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro
Martins, Laércia Ferreira
de Lima, Samya Maria
Isola, Alexandre Marini
Toledo, Diogo
Rezende, Ederlon
Maia, Marcelo
Magnan, Gisele Brocco
author_facet Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro
Martins, Laércia Ferreira
de Lima, Samya Maria
Isola, Alexandre Marini
Toledo, Diogo
Rezende, Ederlon
Maia, Marcelo
Magnan, Gisele Brocco
author_sort Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Enteral nutrition (EN) with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)/γ-linolenic acid (GLA) is recommended for mechanically ventilated patients with severe lung injury. EPA/GLA has anti-inflammatory benefits, as evidenced by its association with reduction in pulmonary inflammation, improvement in oxygenation and improved clinical outcomes in patients with severe forms of acute lung injury. This study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial designed to investigate whether EPA/GLA could have an effective role in the treatment of patients with early sepsis (systemic inflammatory response syndrome with confirmed or presumed infection and without any organ dysfunction) by reducing the progression of the disease to severe sepsis (sepsis associated with at least one organ failure) or septic shock (sepsis associated with hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation). Secondary outcomes included the development of individual organ failure, increased ICU and hospital length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation and 28-day all-cause mortality. METHODS: Randomization was concealed, and patients were allocated to receive, for seven days, either an EPA/GLA diet or an isocaloric, isonitrogenous control diet not enhanced with lipids. Patients were continuously tube-fed at a minimum of 75% of basal energy expenditure × 1.3. To evaluate the progression to severe sepsis and/or septic shock, daily screening for individual organ failure was performed. All clinical outcomes were recorded during a 28-day follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients in the early stages of sepsis requiring EN were included, among whom 106 were considered evaluable. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis demonstrated that patients fed the EPA/GLA diet developed less severe sepsis and/or septic shock than patients fed the control diet (26.3% versus 50%, respectively; P = 0.0259), with similar results observed for the evaluable patients (26.4% versus 50.9% respectively; P = 0.0217). The ITT analysis demonstrated that patients in the study group developed cardiovascular failure (36.2% versus 21%, respectively; P = 0.0381) and respiratory failure (39.6% versus 24.6%, respectively; P = 0.0362) less often than the control group. Similarly, when considering only the evaluable patients, fewer patientsdeveloped cardiovascular failure (20.7% versus 37.7%, respectively; P = 0.03) and respiratory failure (26.4% versus 39.6%, respectively; P = 0.04). The percentage of patients fed the EPA/GLA diet requiring invasive mechanical ventilation was reduced compared with controls (ITT patients: 18.9% versus 33.9%, respectively; P = 0.394; evaluable patients: 17.5% versus 34.5%, respectively; P = 0.295). Patients nourished with the EPA/GLA diet remained in the ICU fewer days than the control population (ITT patients: 21.1 ICU-free days versus 14.7 ICU-free days, respectively; P < 0.0001; evaluable patients: 20.8 ICU-free days versus 14.3 ICU-free days, respectively; P < 0.0001) and fewer days at the hospital (ITT patients: 19.5 hospital-free days versus 10.3 hospital-free days, respectively; P < 0.0001; evaluable patients: 19.1 hospital-free days versus 10.2 hospital-free days, respectively; P < 0.001) (all numbers expressed as means). No significant differences in 28-day all-cause mortality were observed (ITT patients: 26.2% EPA/GLA diet versus 27.6% control diet, respectively; P = 0.72; evaluable: 26.4 EPA/GLA diet versus 30.18 control diet, respectively; P = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that EPA/GLA may play a beneficial role in the treatment of enterally fed patients in the early stages of sepsis without associated organ dysfunction by contributing to slowing the progression of sepsis-related organ dysfunction, especially with regard to cardiovascular and respiratory dysfunction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00981877
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3219016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32190162011-11-17 Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the early treatment of sepsis: results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study: the INTERSEPT Study Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro Martins, Laércia Ferreira de Lima, Samya Maria Isola, Alexandre Marini Toledo, Diogo Rezende, Ederlon Maia, Marcelo Magnan, Gisele Brocco Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Enteral nutrition (EN) with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)/γ-linolenic acid (GLA) is recommended for mechanically ventilated patients with severe lung injury. EPA/GLA has anti-inflammatory benefits, as evidenced by its association with reduction in pulmonary inflammation, improvement in oxygenation and improved clinical outcomes in patients with severe forms of acute lung injury. This study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial designed to investigate whether EPA/GLA could have an effective role in the treatment of patients with early sepsis (systemic inflammatory response syndrome with confirmed or presumed infection and without any organ dysfunction) by reducing the progression of the disease to severe sepsis (sepsis associated with at least one organ failure) or septic shock (sepsis associated with hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation). Secondary outcomes included the development of individual organ failure, increased ICU and hospital length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation and 28-day all-cause mortality. METHODS: Randomization was concealed, and patients were allocated to receive, for seven days, either an EPA/GLA diet or an isocaloric, isonitrogenous control diet not enhanced with lipids. Patients were continuously tube-fed at a minimum of 75% of basal energy expenditure × 1.3. To evaluate the progression to severe sepsis and/or septic shock, daily screening for individual organ failure was performed. All clinical outcomes were recorded during a 28-day follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients in the early stages of sepsis requiring EN were included, among whom 106 were considered evaluable. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis demonstrated that patients fed the EPA/GLA diet developed less severe sepsis and/or septic shock than patients fed the control diet (26.3% versus 50%, respectively; P = 0.0259), with similar results observed for the evaluable patients (26.4% versus 50.9% respectively; P = 0.0217). The ITT analysis demonstrated that patients in the study group developed cardiovascular failure (36.2% versus 21%, respectively; P = 0.0381) and respiratory failure (39.6% versus 24.6%, respectively; P = 0.0362) less often than the control group. Similarly, when considering only the evaluable patients, fewer patientsdeveloped cardiovascular failure (20.7% versus 37.7%, respectively; P = 0.03) and respiratory failure (26.4% versus 39.6%, respectively; P = 0.04). The percentage of patients fed the EPA/GLA diet requiring invasive mechanical ventilation was reduced compared with controls (ITT patients: 18.9% versus 33.9%, respectively; P = 0.394; evaluable patients: 17.5% versus 34.5%, respectively; P = 0.295). Patients nourished with the EPA/GLA diet remained in the ICU fewer days than the control population (ITT patients: 21.1 ICU-free days versus 14.7 ICU-free days, respectively; P < 0.0001; evaluable patients: 20.8 ICU-free days versus 14.3 ICU-free days, respectively; P < 0.0001) and fewer days at the hospital (ITT patients: 19.5 hospital-free days versus 10.3 hospital-free days, respectively; P < 0.0001; evaluable patients: 19.1 hospital-free days versus 10.2 hospital-free days, respectively; P < 0.001) (all numbers expressed as means). No significant differences in 28-day all-cause mortality were observed (ITT patients: 26.2% EPA/GLA diet versus 27.6% control diet, respectively; P = 0.72; evaluable: 26.4 EPA/GLA diet versus 30.18 control diet, respectively; P = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that EPA/GLA may play a beneficial role in the treatment of enterally fed patients in the early stages of sepsis without associated organ dysfunction by contributing to slowing the progression of sepsis-related organ dysfunction, especially with regard to cardiovascular and respiratory dysfunction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00981877 BioMed Central 2011 2011-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3219016/ /pubmed/21658240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10267 Text en Copyright ©2011 Pontes-Arruda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro
Martins, Laércia Ferreira
de Lima, Samya Maria
Isola, Alexandre Marini
Toledo, Diogo
Rezende, Ederlon
Maia, Marcelo
Magnan, Gisele Brocco
Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the early treatment of sepsis: results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study: the INTERSEPT Study
title Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the early treatment of sepsis: results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study: the INTERSEPT Study
title_full Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the early treatment of sepsis: results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study: the INTERSEPT Study
title_fullStr Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the early treatment of sepsis: results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study: the INTERSEPT Study
title_full_unstemmed Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the early treatment of sepsis: results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study: the INTERSEPT Study
title_short Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the early treatment of sepsis: results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study: the INTERSEPT Study
title_sort enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the early treatment of sepsis: results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study: the intersept study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21658240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10267
work_keys_str_mv AT pontesarrudaalessandro enteralnutritionwitheicosapentaenoicacidglinolenicacidandantioxidantsintheearlytreatmentofsepsisresultsfromamulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledstudytheinterseptstudy
AT martinslaerciaferreira enteralnutritionwitheicosapentaenoicacidglinolenicacidandantioxidantsintheearlytreatmentofsepsisresultsfromamulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledstudytheinterseptstudy
AT delimasamyamaria enteralnutritionwitheicosapentaenoicacidglinolenicacidandantioxidantsintheearlytreatmentofsepsisresultsfromamulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledstudytheinterseptstudy
AT isolaalexandremarini enteralnutritionwitheicosapentaenoicacidglinolenicacidandantioxidantsintheearlytreatmentofsepsisresultsfromamulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledstudytheinterseptstudy
AT toledodiogo enteralnutritionwitheicosapentaenoicacidglinolenicacidandantioxidantsintheearlytreatmentofsepsisresultsfromamulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledstudytheinterseptstudy
AT rezendeederlon enteralnutritionwitheicosapentaenoicacidglinolenicacidandantioxidantsintheearlytreatmentofsepsisresultsfromamulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledstudytheinterseptstudy
AT maiamarcelo enteralnutritionwitheicosapentaenoicacidglinolenicacidandantioxidantsintheearlytreatmentofsepsisresultsfromamulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledstudytheinterseptstudy
AT magnangiselebrocco enteralnutritionwitheicosapentaenoicacidglinolenicacidandantioxidantsintheearlytreatmentofsepsisresultsfromamulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcontrolledstudytheinterseptstudy