Cargando…

International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research is to provide recommendations for the management of glycemic control in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty-one experts issued recommendations related to one of the five pre-defined categories (glucose target, hypoglycemia, carbohydrate intake, monitor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ichai, Carole, Preiser, Jean-Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20840773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9258
_version_ 1782216805432950784
author Ichai, Carole
Preiser, Jean-Charles
author_facet Ichai, Carole
Preiser, Jean-Charles
author_sort Ichai, Carole
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research is to provide recommendations for the management of glycemic control in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty-one experts issued recommendations related to one of the five pre-defined categories (glucose target, hypoglycemia, carbohydrate intake, monitoring of glycemia, algorithms and protocols), that were scored on a scale to obtain a strong or weak agreement. The GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used, with a strong recommendation indicating a clear advantage for an intervention and a weak recommendation indicating that the balance between desirable and undesirable effects of an intervention is not clearly defined. RESULTS: A glucose target of less than 10 mmol/L is strongly suggested, using intravenous insulin following a standard protocol, when spontaneous food intake is not possible. Definition of the severe hypoglycemia threshold of 2.2 mmol/L is recommended, regardless of the clinical signs. A general, unique amount of glucose (enteral/parenteral) to administer for any patient cannot be suggested. Glucose measurements should be performed on arterial rather than venous or capillary samples, using central lab or blood gas analysers rather than point-of-care glucose readers. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty recommendations were obtained with a strong (21) and a weak (9) agreement. Among them, only 15 were graded with a high level of quality of evidence, underlying the necessity to continue clinical studies in order to improve the risk-to-benefit ratio of glucose control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3219261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32192612011-11-18 International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients Ichai, Carole Preiser, Jean-Charles Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research is to provide recommendations for the management of glycemic control in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty-one experts issued recommendations related to one of the five pre-defined categories (glucose target, hypoglycemia, carbohydrate intake, monitoring of glycemia, algorithms and protocols), that were scored on a scale to obtain a strong or weak agreement. The GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used, with a strong recommendation indicating a clear advantage for an intervention and a weak recommendation indicating that the balance between desirable and undesirable effects of an intervention is not clearly defined. RESULTS: A glucose target of less than 10 mmol/L is strongly suggested, using intravenous insulin following a standard protocol, when spontaneous food intake is not possible. Definition of the severe hypoglycemia threshold of 2.2 mmol/L is recommended, regardless of the clinical signs. A general, unique amount of glucose (enteral/parenteral) to administer for any patient cannot be suggested. Glucose measurements should be performed on arterial rather than venous or capillary samples, using central lab or blood gas analysers rather than point-of-care glucose readers. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty recommendations were obtained with a strong (21) and a weak (9) agreement. Among them, only 15 were graded with a high level of quality of evidence, underlying the necessity to continue clinical studies in order to improve the risk-to-benefit ratio of glucose control. BioMed Central 2010 2010-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3219261/ /pubmed/20840773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9258 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ichai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ichai, Carole
Preiser, Jean-Charles
International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients
title International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients
title_full International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients
title_fullStr International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients
title_full_unstemmed International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients
title_short International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients
title_sort international recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20840773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9258
work_keys_str_mv AT ichaicarole internationalrecommendationsforglucosecontrolinadultnondiabeticcriticallyillpatients
AT preiserjeancharles internationalrecommendationsforglucosecontrolinadultnondiabeticcriticallyillpatients
AT internationalrecommendationsforglucosecontrolinadultnondiabeticcriticallyillpatients
AT internationalrecommendationsforglucosecontrolinadultnondiabeticcriticallyillpatients