Cargando…
International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research is to provide recommendations for the management of glycemic control in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty-one experts issued recommendations related to one of the five pre-defined categories (glucose target, hypoglycemia, carbohydrate intake, monitor...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20840773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9258 |
_version_ | 1782216805432950784 |
---|---|
author | Ichai, Carole Preiser, Jean-Charles |
author_facet | Ichai, Carole Preiser, Jean-Charles |
author_sort | Ichai, Carole |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research is to provide recommendations for the management of glycemic control in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty-one experts issued recommendations related to one of the five pre-defined categories (glucose target, hypoglycemia, carbohydrate intake, monitoring of glycemia, algorithms and protocols), that were scored on a scale to obtain a strong or weak agreement. The GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used, with a strong recommendation indicating a clear advantage for an intervention and a weak recommendation indicating that the balance between desirable and undesirable effects of an intervention is not clearly defined. RESULTS: A glucose target of less than 10 mmol/L is strongly suggested, using intravenous insulin following a standard protocol, when spontaneous food intake is not possible. Definition of the severe hypoglycemia threshold of 2.2 mmol/L is recommended, regardless of the clinical signs. A general, unique amount of glucose (enteral/parenteral) to administer for any patient cannot be suggested. Glucose measurements should be performed on arterial rather than venous or capillary samples, using central lab or blood gas analysers rather than point-of-care glucose readers. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty recommendations were obtained with a strong (21) and a weak (9) agreement. Among them, only 15 were graded with a high level of quality of evidence, underlying the necessity to continue clinical studies in order to improve the risk-to-benefit ratio of glucose control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3219261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32192612011-11-18 International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients Ichai, Carole Preiser, Jean-Charles Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research is to provide recommendations for the management of glycemic control in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty-one experts issued recommendations related to one of the five pre-defined categories (glucose target, hypoglycemia, carbohydrate intake, monitoring of glycemia, algorithms and protocols), that were scored on a scale to obtain a strong or weak agreement. The GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used, with a strong recommendation indicating a clear advantage for an intervention and a weak recommendation indicating that the balance between desirable and undesirable effects of an intervention is not clearly defined. RESULTS: A glucose target of less than 10 mmol/L is strongly suggested, using intravenous insulin following a standard protocol, when spontaneous food intake is not possible. Definition of the severe hypoglycemia threshold of 2.2 mmol/L is recommended, regardless of the clinical signs. A general, unique amount of glucose (enteral/parenteral) to administer for any patient cannot be suggested. Glucose measurements should be performed on arterial rather than venous or capillary samples, using central lab or blood gas analysers rather than point-of-care glucose readers. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty recommendations were obtained with a strong (21) and a weak (9) agreement. Among them, only 15 were graded with a high level of quality of evidence, underlying the necessity to continue clinical studies in order to improve the risk-to-benefit ratio of glucose control. BioMed Central 2010 2010-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3219261/ /pubmed/20840773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9258 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ichai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ichai, Carole Preiser, Jean-Charles International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients |
title | International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients |
title_full | International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients |
title_fullStr | International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients |
title_full_unstemmed | International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients |
title_short | International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients |
title_sort | international recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20840773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ichaicarole internationalrecommendationsforglucosecontrolinadultnondiabeticcriticallyillpatients AT preiserjeancharles internationalrecommendationsforglucosecontrolinadultnondiabeticcriticallyillpatients AT internationalrecommendationsforglucosecontrolinadultnondiabeticcriticallyillpatients AT internationalrecommendationsforglucosecontrolinadultnondiabeticcriticallyillpatients |