Cargando…

Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units

INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests that choice of fluid used for resuscitation may influence mortality in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units across 25 countries to describe the types of fluids administered during resuscitation episo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finfer, Simon, Liu, Bette, Taylor, Colman, Bellomo, Rinaldo, Billot, Laurent, Cook, Deborah, Du, Bin, McArthur, Colin, Myburgh, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20950434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9293
_version_ 1782216812189974528
author Finfer, Simon
Liu, Bette
Taylor, Colman
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Billot, Laurent
Cook, Deborah
Du, Bin
McArthur, Colin
Myburgh, John
author_facet Finfer, Simon
Liu, Bette
Taylor, Colman
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Billot, Laurent
Cook, Deborah
Du, Bin
McArthur, Colin
Myburgh, John
author_sort Finfer, Simon
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests that choice of fluid used for resuscitation may influence mortality in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units across 25 countries to describe the types of fluids administered during resuscitation episodes. We used generalized estimating equations to examine the association between patient, prescriber and geographic factors and the type of fluid administered (classified as crystalloid, colloid or blood products). RESULTS: During the 24-hour study period, 1,955 of 5,274 (37.1%) patients received resuscitation fluid during 4,488 resuscitation episodes. The main indications for administering crystalloid or colloid were impaired perfusion (1,526/3,419 (44.6%) of episodes), or to correct abnormal vital signs (1,189/3,419 (34.8%)). Overall, colloid was administered to more patients (1,234 (23.4%) versus 782 (14.8%)) and during more episodes (2,173 (48.4%) versus 1,468 (32.7%)) than crystalloid. After adjusting for patient and prescriber characteristics, practice varied significantly between countries with country being a strong independent determinant of the type of fluid prescribed. Compared to Canada where crystalloid, colloid and blood products were administered in 35.5%, 40.6% and 28.3% of resuscitation episodes respectively, odds ratios for the prescription of crystalloid in China, Great Britain and New Zealand were 0.46 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 0.69), 0.18 (0.10 to 0.32) and 3.43 (1.71 to 6.84) respectively; odds ratios for the prescription of colloid in China, Great Britain and New Zealand were 1.72 (1.20 to 2.47), 4.72 (2.99 to 7.44) and 0.39 (0.21 to 0.74) respectively. In contrast, choice of fluid was not influenced by measures of illness severity (for example, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of resuscitation fluid is a common intervention in intensive care units and choice of fluid varies markedly between countries. Although colloid solutions are more expensive and may possibly be harmful in some patients, they were administered to more patients and during more resuscitation episodes than crystalloids were.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3219291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32192912011-11-18 Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units Finfer, Simon Liu, Bette Taylor, Colman Bellomo, Rinaldo Billot, Laurent Cook, Deborah Du, Bin McArthur, Colin Myburgh, John Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests that choice of fluid used for resuscitation may influence mortality in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units across 25 countries to describe the types of fluids administered during resuscitation episodes. We used generalized estimating equations to examine the association between patient, prescriber and geographic factors and the type of fluid administered (classified as crystalloid, colloid or blood products). RESULTS: During the 24-hour study period, 1,955 of 5,274 (37.1%) patients received resuscitation fluid during 4,488 resuscitation episodes. The main indications for administering crystalloid or colloid were impaired perfusion (1,526/3,419 (44.6%) of episodes), or to correct abnormal vital signs (1,189/3,419 (34.8%)). Overall, colloid was administered to more patients (1,234 (23.4%) versus 782 (14.8%)) and during more episodes (2,173 (48.4%) versus 1,468 (32.7%)) than crystalloid. After adjusting for patient and prescriber characteristics, practice varied significantly between countries with country being a strong independent determinant of the type of fluid prescribed. Compared to Canada where crystalloid, colloid and blood products were administered in 35.5%, 40.6% and 28.3% of resuscitation episodes respectively, odds ratios for the prescription of crystalloid in China, Great Britain and New Zealand were 0.46 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 0.69), 0.18 (0.10 to 0.32) and 3.43 (1.71 to 6.84) respectively; odds ratios for the prescription of colloid in China, Great Britain and New Zealand were 1.72 (1.20 to 2.47), 4.72 (2.99 to 7.44) and 0.39 (0.21 to 0.74) respectively. In contrast, choice of fluid was not influenced by measures of illness severity (for example, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of resuscitation fluid is a common intervention in intensive care units and choice of fluid varies markedly between countries. Although colloid solutions are more expensive and may possibly be harmful in some patients, they were administered to more patients and during more resuscitation episodes than crystalloids were. BioMed Central 2010 2010-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3219291/ /pubmed/20950434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9293 Text en Copyright ©2010 Finfer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Research
Finfer, Simon
Liu, Bette
Taylor, Colman
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Billot, Laurent
Cook, Deborah
Du, Bin
McArthur, Colin
Myburgh, John
Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units
title Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units
title_full Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units
title_fullStr Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units
title_full_unstemmed Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units
title_short Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units
title_sort resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20950434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9293
work_keys_str_mv AT finfersimon resuscitationfluiduseincriticallyilladultsaninternationalcrosssectionalstudyin391intensivecareunits
AT liubette resuscitationfluiduseincriticallyilladultsaninternationalcrosssectionalstudyin391intensivecareunits
AT taylorcolman resuscitationfluiduseincriticallyilladultsaninternationalcrosssectionalstudyin391intensivecareunits
AT bellomorinaldo resuscitationfluiduseincriticallyilladultsaninternationalcrosssectionalstudyin391intensivecareunits
AT billotlaurent resuscitationfluiduseincriticallyilladultsaninternationalcrosssectionalstudyin391intensivecareunits
AT cookdeborah resuscitationfluiduseincriticallyilladultsaninternationalcrosssectionalstudyin391intensivecareunits
AT dubin resuscitationfluiduseincriticallyilladultsaninternationalcrosssectionalstudyin391intensivecareunits
AT mcarthurcolin resuscitationfluiduseincriticallyilladultsaninternationalcrosssectionalstudyin391intensivecareunits
AT myburghjohn resuscitationfluiduseincriticallyilladultsaninternationalcrosssectionalstudyin391intensivecareunits