Cargando…

Effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a meta-analysis in order to investigate the effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H(2)RA) versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Jiahao, Cao, Yunfei, Liao, Cun, Wu, Liucheng, Gao, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21034484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9312
_version_ 1782216814454898688
author Huang, Jiahao
Cao, Yunfei
Liao, Cun
Wu, Liucheng
Gao, Feng
author_facet Huang, Jiahao
Cao, Yunfei
Liao, Cun
Wu, Liucheng
Gao, Feng
author_sort Huang, Jiahao
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We conducted a meta-analysis in order to investigate the effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H(2)RA) versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1966 to January 2010) was conducted using specific search terms. A review of Web of Science and a manual review of references were also performed. Eligible studies were randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared H(2)RA and sucralfate for the prevention of stress ulcer in mechanically ventilated patients. Main outcome measures were rates of overt bleeding, clinically important gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, ventilator-associated pneumonia, gastric colonization and ICU mortality. RESULTS: Ten RCTs with 2,092 participants on mechanical ventilation were identified. Meta-analysis showed there was a trend toward decreased overt bleeding when H(2)RA was compared with sucralfate (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.53). A total of 12 clinically important GI bleeding events occurred among 667 patients (1.8%) in the H(2)RA group compared with 26 events among 673 patients (3.9%) in the sucralfate groups. Prophylaxis with sucralfate decreased the incidence of gastric colonization (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.29 to 3.19) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.64). Subgroup analysis showed H(2)RA was not superior to sucralfate in reducing early-onset pneumonia (OR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.36 to 1.07) but had a higher late-onset pneumonia rate (OR = 4.36, 95%CI: 2.09 to 9.09) relative to sucralfate. No statistically significant reduction was observed in mortality of ICU between groups (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mechanical ventilation, H(2)RA resulted in no differential effectiveness in treating overt bleeding, but had higher rates of gastric colonization and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Additional RCTs of stress ulcer prophylaxis with H(2)RA and sucralfate are needed to establish the net benefit and risks of adverse effect in mechanically ventilated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3219301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32193012011-11-18 Effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials Huang, Jiahao Cao, Yunfei Liao, Cun Wu, Liucheng Gao, Feng Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: We conducted a meta-analysis in order to investigate the effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H(2)RA) versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1966 to January 2010) was conducted using specific search terms. A review of Web of Science and a manual review of references were also performed. Eligible studies were randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared H(2)RA and sucralfate for the prevention of stress ulcer in mechanically ventilated patients. Main outcome measures were rates of overt bleeding, clinically important gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, ventilator-associated pneumonia, gastric colonization and ICU mortality. RESULTS: Ten RCTs with 2,092 participants on mechanical ventilation were identified. Meta-analysis showed there was a trend toward decreased overt bleeding when H(2)RA was compared with sucralfate (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.53). A total of 12 clinically important GI bleeding events occurred among 667 patients (1.8%) in the H(2)RA group compared with 26 events among 673 patients (3.9%) in the sucralfate groups. Prophylaxis with sucralfate decreased the incidence of gastric colonization (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.29 to 3.19) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.64). Subgroup analysis showed H(2)RA was not superior to sucralfate in reducing early-onset pneumonia (OR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.36 to 1.07) but had a higher late-onset pneumonia rate (OR = 4.36, 95%CI: 2.09 to 9.09) relative to sucralfate. No statistically significant reduction was observed in mortality of ICU between groups (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mechanical ventilation, H(2)RA resulted in no differential effectiveness in treating overt bleeding, but had higher rates of gastric colonization and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Additional RCTs of stress ulcer prophylaxis with H(2)RA and sucralfate are needed to establish the net benefit and risks of adverse effect in mechanically ventilated patients. BioMed Central 2010 2010-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3219301/ /pubmed/21034484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9312 Text en Copyright ©2010 Huang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Huang, Jiahao
Cao, Yunfei
Liao, Cun
Wu, Liucheng
Gao, Feng
Effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials
title Effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials
title_full Effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials
title_short Effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials
title_sort effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21034484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9312
work_keys_str_mv AT huangjiahao effectofhistamine2receptorantagonistsversussucralfateonstressulcerprophylaxisinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisof10randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT caoyunfei effectofhistamine2receptorantagonistsversussucralfateonstressulcerprophylaxisinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisof10randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liaocun effectofhistamine2receptorantagonistsversussucralfateonstressulcerprophylaxisinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisof10randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuliucheng effectofhistamine2receptorantagonistsversussucralfateonstressulcerprophylaxisinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisof10randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT gaofeng effectofhistamine2receptorantagonistsversussucralfateonstressulcerprophylaxisinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisof10randomizedcontrolledtrials