Cargando…

Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Donor site wounds after split-skin grafting are rather 'standard' wounds. At present, lots of dressings and topical agents for donor site wounds are commercially available. This causes large variation in the local care of these wounds, while the optimum 'standard' dre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskes, Anne M, Brölmann, Fleur E, Gerbens, Louise AA, Ubbink, Dirk T, Vermeulen, Hester
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-229
_version_ 1782216848230580224
author Eskes, Anne M
Brölmann, Fleur E
Gerbens, Louise AA
Ubbink, Dirk T
Vermeulen, Hester
author_facet Eskes, Anne M
Brölmann, Fleur E
Gerbens, Louise AA
Ubbink, Dirk T
Vermeulen, Hester
author_sort Eskes, Anne M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Donor site wounds after split-skin grafting are rather 'standard' wounds. At present, lots of dressings and topical agents for donor site wounds are commercially available. This causes large variation in the local care of these wounds, while the optimum 'standard' dressing for local wound care is unclear. This protocol describes a trial in which we investigate the effectiveness of various treatment options for these donor site wounds. METHODS: A 14-center, six-armed randomized clinical trial is being carried out in the Netherlands. An a-priori power analysis and an anticipated dropout rate of 15% indicates that 50 patients per group are necessary, totaling 300 patients, to be able to detect a 25% quicker mean time to complete wound healing. Randomization has been computerized to ensure allocation concealment. Adult patients who need a split-skin grafting operation for any reason, leaving a donor site wound of at least 10 cm(2 )are included and receive one of the following dressings: hydrocolloid, alginate, film, hydrofiber, silicone dressing, or paraffin gauze. No combinations of products from other intervention groups in this trial are allowed. Optimum application and changes of these dressings are pursued according to the protocol as supplied by the dressing manufacturers. Primary outcomes are days to complete wound healing and pain (using a Visual Analogue Scale). Secondary outcomes are adverse effects, scarring, patient satisfaction, and costs. Outcome assessors unaware of the treatment allocation will assess whether or not an outcome has occurred. Results will be analyzed according to the intention to treat principle. The first patient was randomized October 1, 2009. DISCUSSION: This study will provide comprehensive data on the effectiveness of different treatment options for donor site wounds. The dressing(s) that will prevail in effectiveness, satisfaction and costs will be promoted among clinicians dealing with such patients. Thus, we aim to contribute a well-designed trial, relevant to all clinicians involved in the care for donor site wounds, which will help enhance uniformity and quality of care for these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.trialregister.nl, NTR1849. Date registered: June 9, 2009
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3219559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32195592011-11-18 Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Eskes, Anne M Brölmann, Fleur E Gerbens, Louise AA Ubbink, Dirk T Vermeulen, Hester Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Donor site wounds after split-skin grafting are rather 'standard' wounds. At present, lots of dressings and topical agents for donor site wounds are commercially available. This causes large variation in the local care of these wounds, while the optimum 'standard' dressing for local wound care is unclear. This protocol describes a trial in which we investigate the effectiveness of various treatment options for these donor site wounds. METHODS: A 14-center, six-armed randomized clinical trial is being carried out in the Netherlands. An a-priori power analysis and an anticipated dropout rate of 15% indicates that 50 patients per group are necessary, totaling 300 patients, to be able to detect a 25% quicker mean time to complete wound healing. Randomization has been computerized to ensure allocation concealment. Adult patients who need a split-skin grafting operation for any reason, leaving a donor site wound of at least 10 cm(2 )are included and receive one of the following dressings: hydrocolloid, alginate, film, hydrofiber, silicone dressing, or paraffin gauze. No combinations of products from other intervention groups in this trial are allowed. Optimum application and changes of these dressings are pursued according to the protocol as supplied by the dressing manufacturers. Primary outcomes are days to complete wound healing and pain (using a Visual Analogue Scale). Secondary outcomes are adverse effects, scarring, patient satisfaction, and costs. Outcome assessors unaware of the treatment allocation will assess whether or not an outcome has occurred. Results will be analyzed according to the intention to treat principle. The first patient was randomized October 1, 2009. DISCUSSION: This study will provide comprehensive data on the effectiveness of different treatment options for donor site wounds. The dressing(s) that will prevail in effectiveness, satisfaction and costs will be promoted among clinicians dealing with such patients. Thus, we aim to contribute a well-designed trial, relevant to all clinicians involved in the care for donor site wounds, which will help enhance uniformity and quality of care for these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.trialregister.nl, NTR1849. Date registered: June 9, 2009 BioMed Central 2011-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3219559/ /pubmed/21999705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-229 Text en Copyright ©2011 Eskes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Eskes, Anne M
Brölmann, Fleur E
Gerbens, Louise AA
Ubbink, Dirk T
Vermeulen, Hester
Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-229
work_keys_str_mv AT eskesannem whichdressingdodonorsitewoundsneedstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brolmannfleure whichdressingdodonorsitewoundsneedstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gerbenslouiseaa whichdressingdodonorsitewoundsneedstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ubbinkdirkt whichdressingdodonorsitewoundsneedstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vermeulenhester whichdressingdodonorsitewoundsneedstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial